Medical Students' Preferences on Practicing Intravenous Insertion on Each Other and Via Simulation.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000810
Risa Kiernan, Shannon Smith, Michelle Kikel, Blake Forkey, Avarie Rembert, Min-Kyung Jung, Bhuma Krishnamachari, Michael Gindi
{"title":"Medical Students' Preferences on Practicing Intravenous Insertion on Each Other and Via Simulation.","authors":"Risa Kiernan, Shannon Smith, Michelle Kikel, Blake Forkey, Avarie Rembert, Min-Kyung Jung, Bhuma Krishnamachari, Michael Gindi","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary statement: </strong>Medical students have traditionally practiced painful procedures such as intravenous (IV) line insertion on each other. Recently, there has been more emphasis on learning through simulation. Our study investigated students' attitudes regarding IV line insertion training, focusing on their anxiety, expectation to learn empathy, learning preference, and litigiousness. A 24-question survey was taken regarding anxiety and empathy when learning IV placement on each other versus on mannequins.Many students believed that they could learn empathy skills and better appreciate patient discomfort by learning IV placement through person-based practice. However, students who reported feeling anxious about having a student practice IV placement on them believed they were less likely to learn empathy through having a student practice IV insertion on them. The preferred method of learning painful procedures, such as IV placement, may be through a combination of simulation and person-based practice to mitigate anxiety while also enhancing empathy skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary statement: Medical students have traditionally practiced painful procedures such as intravenous (IV) line insertion on each other. Recently, there has been more emphasis on learning through simulation. Our study investigated students' attitudes regarding IV line insertion training, focusing on their anxiety, expectation to learn empathy, learning preference, and litigiousness. A 24-question survey was taken regarding anxiety and empathy when learning IV placement on each other versus on mannequins.Many students believed that they could learn empathy skills and better appreciate patient discomfort by learning IV placement through person-based practice. However, students who reported feeling anxious about having a student practice IV placement on them believed they were less likely to learn empathy through having a student practice IV insertion on them. The preferred method of learning painful procedures, such as IV placement, may be through a combination of simulation and person-based practice to mitigate anxiety while also enhancing empathy skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生对互相练习和通过模拟进行静脉插入的偏好。
摘要说明:医科学生历来都会互相练习痛苦的操作,如静脉注射管插入。最近,人们更加强调通过模拟学习。我们的研究调查了学生对静脉注射管插入训练的态度,重点是他们的焦虑、对学习移情的期望、学习偏好和诉讼性。许多学生认为,通过人机对话练习学习静脉置管,他们可以学到移情技能,更好地体会病人的不适。然而,那些表示对让学生在自己身上练习静脉置管感到焦虑的学生则认为,让学生在自己身上练习静脉置管,他们不太可能学到移情技能。学习静脉置管等痛苦手术的首选方法可能是通过模拟和个人练习相结合的方式,以减轻焦虑,同时提高移情技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Creation of a Novel Child Simulator and Curriculum to Optimize Administration of Seizure Rescue Medication. Increase in Newborns Ventilated Within the First Minute of Life and Reduced Mortality After Clinical Data-Guided Simulation Training. Systematic Review of Procedural Skill Simulation in Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Optimal Duration of High-Fidelity Simulator Training for Bronchoscope-Guided Intubation: A Noninferiority Randomized Trial. Theoretical, Conceptual, and Operational Aspects in Simulation Training With Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1