Prostate cancer detection rate with MRI-targeted biopsy alone using outpatient transperineal prostate biopsy.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.5489/cuaj.8675
Pier Paolo Avolio, Toufic Hassan, Abdulmalik Addar, Hend Alshamsi, Victor McPherson, Oleg Loutochin, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Maria Buffi, Maurice Anidjar, Rafael Sanchez-Salas
{"title":"Prostate cancer detection rate with MRI-targeted biopsy alone using outpatient transperineal prostate biopsy.","authors":"Pier Paolo Avolio, Toufic Hassan, Abdulmalik Addar, Hend Alshamsi, Victor McPherson, Oleg Loutochin, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Maria Buffi, Maurice Anidjar, Rafael Sanchez-Salas","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to compare the detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (cs)PCa by magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted biopsy (MTBx) alone and MTBx plus systematic biopsy (SBx) using an outpatient transperineal (TP) approach under local anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients who underwent outpatient TP prostate biopsy under local anesthesia at our tertiary institution between 2019 and 2022 was performed. To compare the proportions of PCa and csPCa in both pathways, McNemar's tests were used. Multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to determine the predictors of csPCa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 255 men included, 177 (69%) underwent MTBx alone. MTBx had similar detection rate for PCa (56%) and csPCa (47%) compared to the combination of MTBx and SBx (PCa, 61%; csPCa, 49%; p=0.1 and p=0.3, respectively). MTBx had lower median number of biopsy cores compared to the combination of MTBx and SBx (6 vs. 11, p<0.001). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.08 [1.04-1.13], p<0.001), prior negative biopsy (OR 0.19 [0.09-0.44], p<0.001), prostate-specific antigen density cutoff ≥ 0.15 (OR 3.17 [1.67-6.01], p<0.001), and prostate imaging reporting and data system ≥4 (OR 12.2 [4.21-35.6], p<0.001) were independent predictors of csPCa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MTBx showed similar diagnostic performance to the combination of MTBx and SBx in patients undergoing outpatient TP prostate biopsy. Future studies are needed to evaluate the role of MTBx in avoiding unnecessary biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8675","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to compare the detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (cs)PCa by magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted biopsy (MTBx) alone and MTBx plus systematic biopsy (SBx) using an outpatient transperineal (TP) approach under local anesthesia.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent outpatient TP prostate biopsy under local anesthesia at our tertiary institution between 2019 and 2022 was performed. To compare the proportions of PCa and csPCa in both pathways, McNemar's tests were used. Multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to determine the predictors of csPCa.

Results: Of 255 men included, 177 (69%) underwent MTBx alone. MTBx had similar detection rate for PCa (56%) and csPCa (47%) compared to the combination of MTBx and SBx (PCa, 61%; csPCa, 49%; p=0.1 and p=0.3, respectively). MTBx had lower median number of biopsy cores compared to the combination of MTBx and SBx (6 vs. 11, p<0.001). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.08 [1.04-1.13], p<0.001), prior negative biopsy (OR 0.19 [0.09-0.44], p<0.001), prostate-specific antigen density cutoff ≥ 0.15 (OR 3.17 [1.67-6.01], p<0.001), and prostate imaging reporting and data system ≥4 (OR 12.2 [4.21-35.6], p<0.001) were independent predictors of csPCa.

Conclusions: MTBx showed similar diagnostic performance to the combination of MTBx and SBx in patients undergoing outpatient TP prostate biopsy. Future studies are needed to evaluate the role of MTBx in avoiding unnecessary biopsies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用门诊经会阴前列腺活检术,仅进行磁共振成像靶向活检的前列腺癌检出率。
前言我们的目的是比较在局部麻醉下使用门诊经会阴(TP)方法单独进行磁共振成像引导靶向活检(MTBx)和MTBx加系统活检(SBx)对前列腺癌(PCa)和有临床意义(cs)PCa的检出率:方法:对2019年至2022年期间在本院三级医院接受局部麻醉下门诊TP前列腺活检的患者进行回顾性研究。比较两种途径中 PCa 和 csPCa 的比例,采用 McNemar 检验。采用多变量逻辑回归模型确定 csPCa 的预测因素:在纳入的 255 名男性中,177 人(69%)仅接受了 MTBx。与MTBx和SBx联合治疗相比,MTBx对PCa(56%)和csPCa(47%)的检出率相似(PCa,61%;csPCa,49%;分别为p=0.1和p=0.3)。与MTBx和SBx联合疗法相比,MTBx的活检核心中位数较低(6对11,p结论:在门诊接受TP前列腺活检的患者中,MTBx与MTBx和SBx的诊断效果相似。今后还需要进行研究,评估MTBx在避免不必要的活组织检查方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
期刊最新文献
A novel technique for proximal inferior vena cava control during tumor thrombectomy using the COBRA-OS balloon. Case - Long-term remission after repeated courses of palliative radiotherapy in a patient with metastatic MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma. Navigating prostate cancer screening in Canada for marginalized men through PSA screening and guidelines adherence A call to action for policymakers. The safety and efficacy of ambulatory urologic surgery: A paradigm shift towards optimizing resource utilization in outpatient settings. Adult patients treated for bladder exstrophy at a young age What are their current demands?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1