Comparison of admission glycemic variability and glycosylated hemoglobin in predicting major adverse cardiac events among type 2 diabetes patients with heart failure following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Translational Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-21 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.2478/jtim-2024-0006
Xiuxiu Yang, Gong Su, Tao Zhang, Hongxia Yang, Hong Tao, Xin Du, Jianzeng Dong
{"title":"Comparison of admission glycemic variability and glycosylated hemoglobin in predicting major adverse cardiac events among type 2 diabetes patients with heart failure following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.","authors":"Xiuxiu Yang, Gong Su, Tao Zhang, Hongxia Yang, Hong Tao, Xin Du, Jianzeng Dong","doi":"10.2478/jtim-2024-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as well as in patients with heart failure. However, the significance of admission glycemic variability (GV) in predicting outcomes among diabetes patients with heart failure (HF) following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ASTEMI) remains unclear. This study aims to explore the prognostic value of admission GV and admission glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured GV and HbA1c upon admission in 484 consecutive patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI. GV, indicated as the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), was assessed utilizing a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). admission MAGE values were categorized as < 3.9 or ≥ 3.9 mmol/L, while HbA1c levels were classified as < 6.5 or ≥ 6.5%. Participants were followed up prospectively for 12 months. The relationship of admission MAGE and HbA1c to the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) of patients with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 484 enrolled patients, the occurrence of MACE differed significantly based on MAGE categories (< 3.9 <i>vs</i>. ≥ 3.9 mmol/L), with rates of 13.6% and 25.3%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.001). While MACE rates varied by HbA1c categories (< 6.5 <i>vs</i>. ≥ 6.5%) at 15.7% and 21.8%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.086). Patients with higher MAGE levels exhibited a notably elevated risk of cardiac mortality and an increased incidence of HF rehospitalization. The Kaplan-Meier curves analysis demonstrated a significantly lower event-free survival rate in the high MAGE level group compared to the low MAGE level group (log-rank test, <i>P</i> < 0.001), while HbA1c did not exhibit a similar distinction. In multivariate analysis, high MAGE level was significantly associated with incidence of MACE (hazard ratio 3.645, 95% CI 1.287-10.325, <i>P</i> = 0.015), whereas HbA1c did not demonstrate a comparable association (hazard ratio 1.075, 95% CI 0.907-1.274, <i>P</i> = 0.403).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated admission GV emerges as a more significant predictor of 1-year MACE in patients with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI, surpassing the predictive value of HbA1c.</p>","PeriodicalId":51339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Translational Internal Medicine","volume":"12 2","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Translational Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jtim-2024-0006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as well as in patients with heart failure. However, the significance of admission glycemic variability (GV) in predicting outcomes among diabetes patients with heart failure (HF) following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (ASTEMI) remains unclear. This study aims to explore the prognostic value of admission GV and admission glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI.

Methods: We measured GV and HbA1c upon admission in 484 consecutive patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI. GV, indicated as the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), was assessed utilizing a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). admission MAGE values were categorized as < 3.9 or ≥ 3.9 mmol/L, while HbA1c levels were classified as < 6.5 or ≥ 6.5%. Participants were followed up prospectively for 12 months. The relationship of admission MAGE and HbA1c to the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) of patients with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI was analyzed.

Results: Among the 484 enrolled patients, the occurrence of MACE differed significantly based on MAGE categories (< 3.9 vs. ≥ 3.9 mmol/L), with rates of 13.6% and 25.3%, respectively (P = 0.001). While MACE rates varied by HbA1c categories (< 6.5 vs. ≥ 6.5%) at 15.7% and 21.8%, respectively (P = 0.086). Patients with higher MAGE levels exhibited a notably elevated risk of cardiac mortality and an increased incidence of HF rehospitalization. The Kaplan-Meier curves analysis demonstrated a significantly lower event-free survival rate in the high MAGE level group compared to the low MAGE level group (log-rank test, P < 0.001), while HbA1c did not exhibit a similar distinction. In multivariate analysis, high MAGE level was significantly associated with incidence of MACE (hazard ratio 3.645, 95% CI 1.287-10.325, P = 0.015), whereas HbA1c did not demonstrate a comparable association (hazard ratio 1.075, 95% CI 0.907-1.274, P = 0.403).

Conclusions: Elevated admission GV emerges as a more significant predictor of 1-year MACE in patients with type 2 diabetes and HF following ASTEMI, surpassing the predictive value of HbA1c.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较入院血糖变异性和糖化血红蛋白在预测急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死后 2 型糖尿病心力衰竭患者主要不良心脏事件中的作用。
背景和目的:高血糖与急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者以及心力衰竭患者的不良预后有关。然而,入院血糖变异性(GV)在预测急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(ASTEMI)后心力衰竭(HF)糖尿病患者预后方面的意义仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨入院 GV 和入院糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平在确诊为 2 型糖尿病合并 HF 的 ASTEMI 患者中的预后价值:我们测量了 484 名连续确诊为 2 型糖尿病和 ASTEMI 后患有 HF 的患者入院时的 GV 和 HbA1c。入院时的 MAGE 值分为 < 3.9 或 ≥ 3.9 mmol/L,而 HbA1c 水平分为 < 6.5 或 ≥ 6.5%。对参与者进行了为期 12 个月的前瞻性随访。分析了入院时MAGE和HbA1c与ASTEMI后2型糖尿病合并HF患者主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的关系:结果:在484名入选患者中,MACE的发生率因MAGE类别(< 3.9 vs. ≥ 3.9 mmol/L)而有显著差异,分别为13.6%和25.3%(P = 0.001)。MACE发生率因HbA1c类别而异(< 6.5 vs. ≥ 6.5%),分别为15.7%和21.8%(P = 0.086)。MAGE 水平较高的患者心脏死亡风险明显升高,心房颤动再住院的发生率也有所增加。卡普兰-梅耶曲线分析表明,与低 MAGE 水平组相比,高 MAGE 水平组的无事件生存率明显较低(对数秩检验,P < 0.001),而 HbA1c 没有类似的差异。在多变量分析中,高 MAGE 水平与 MACE 发生率显著相关(危险比 3.645,95% CI 1.287-10.325,P = 0.015),而 HbA1c 并未显示出类似的关联性(危险比 1.075,95% CI 0.907-1.274,P = 0.403):入院 GV 升高是预测 2 型糖尿病合并 HF 患者 ASTEMI 后 1 年 MACE 的更重要因素,其预测价值超过了 HbA1c。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Translational Internal Medicine
Journal of Translational Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
8.20%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence for disease X: Progress and challenges. Association of life's essential 8 with prevalence and all-cause mortality of chronic kidney disease among US adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2015-2018). Development and validation of web-based risk score predicting prognostic nomograms for elderly patients with primary colorectal lymphoma: A population-based study. Effectiveness and safety of Qixuekang Oral Liquid on vascular health. Gene therapy in polycystic kidney disease: A promising future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1