Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in patients with first acute myocardial infarction: an emerging post-revascularization triage tool.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Hellenic Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2024.07.002
Vasileios Anastasiou, Stylianos Daios, Dimitrios V Moysidis, Alexandros C Liatsos, Andreas S Papazoglou, Matthaios Didagelos, Christos Savopoulos, Jeroen J Bax, Antonios Ziakas, Vasileios Kamperidis
{"title":"Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in patients with first acute myocardial infarction: an emerging post-revascularization triage tool.","authors":"Vasileios Anastasiou, Stylianos Daios, Dimitrios V Moysidis, Alexandros C Liatsos, Andreas S Papazoglou, Matthaios Didagelos, Christos Savopoulos, Jeroen J Bax, Antonios Ziakas, Vasileios Kamperidis","doi":"10.1016/j.hjc.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) ratio is a non-invasive surrogate for right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling, studied in chronic RV pressure overload syndromes. However, its prognostic utility in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which may cause acute RV pressure overload, remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine predictors of RV-PA uncoupling in patients with first AMI and examine whether it could improve risk stratification for cardiovascular in-hospital mortality after revascularization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-hundred consecutive patients with first AMI were prospectively studied (age 61.2 ± 11.8, 24% females). Echocardiography was performed 24 h after successful revascularization, and TAPSE/PASP was evaluated. Cardiovascular in-hospital mortality was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cutoff value of TAPSE/PASP to determine cardiovascular in-hospital mortality was 0.49 mm/mmHg. RV-PA uncoupling was considered for patients with TAPSE/PASP ≤0.49 mm/mmHg. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was independently associated with RV-PA uncoupling. A total of 23 (7.7%) patients died in hospital despite successful revascularization. TAPSE/PASP was independently associated with in-hospital mortality after adjustment for Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score and LVEF (odds ratio 0.14 [95% confidence interval 0.03-0.56], P = 0.007). The prognostic value of a baseline model including the GRACE risk score and NT-pro-BNP (χ<sup>2</sup> 26.55) was significantly improved by adding LVEF ≤40% (χ<sup>2</sup> 44.71, P < 0.001), TAPSE ≤ 17 mm (χ<sup>2</sup> 75.42, P < 0.001) and TAPSE/PASP ≤ 0.49 mm/mmHg (χ<sup>2</sup> 101.74, P < 0.001) for predicting cardiovascular in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RV-PA uncoupling, assessed by echocardiographic TAPSE/PASP ≤ 0.49 mm/mmHg 24 h after revascularization, may improve risk stratification for cardiovascular in-hospital mortality after first AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":55062,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2024.07.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) ratio is a non-invasive surrogate for right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling, studied in chronic RV pressure overload syndromes. However, its prognostic utility in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which may cause acute RV pressure overload, remains unexplored.

Objective: This study aimed to determine predictors of RV-PA uncoupling in patients with first AMI and examine whether it could improve risk stratification for cardiovascular in-hospital mortality after revascularization.

Methods: Three-hundred consecutive patients with first AMI were prospectively studied (age 61.2 ± 11.8, 24% females). Echocardiography was performed 24 h after successful revascularization, and TAPSE/PASP was evaluated. Cardiovascular in-hospital mortality was recorded.

Results: The optimal cutoff value of TAPSE/PASP to determine cardiovascular in-hospital mortality was 0.49 mm/mmHg. RV-PA uncoupling was considered for patients with TAPSE/PASP ≤0.49 mm/mmHg. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was independently associated with RV-PA uncoupling. A total of 23 (7.7%) patients died in hospital despite successful revascularization. TAPSE/PASP was independently associated with in-hospital mortality after adjustment for Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score and LVEF (odds ratio 0.14 [95% confidence interval 0.03-0.56], P = 0.007). The prognostic value of a baseline model including the GRACE risk score and NT-pro-BNP (χ2 26.55) was significantly improved by adding LVEF ≤40% (χ2 44.71, P < 0.001), TAPSE ≤ 17 mm (χ2 75.42, P < 0.001) and TAPSE/PASP ≤ 0.49 mm/mmHg (χ2 101.74, P < 0.001) for predicting cardiovascular in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion: RV-PA uncoupling, assessed by echocardiographic TAPSE/PASP ≤ 0.49 mm/mmHg 24 h after revascularization, may improve risk stratification for cardiovascular in-hospital mortality after first AMI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次急性心肌梗死患者的右心室-肺动脉耦合:一种新兴的血管重建后分流工具。
背景:三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移/肺动脉收缩压(TAPSE/PASP)是右心室-肺动脉(RV-PA)耦合的无创替代指标,曾在慢性 RV 压力超负荷综合征中进行过研究。然而,它在可能导致急性 RV 压力超负荷的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中的预后作用仍有待探索:目的:确定首次急性心肌梗死患者 RV-PA 解耦的预测因素,并研究其是否能改善心血管再通术后心血管病院内死亡率的风险分层:连续对 300 名首次急性心肌梗死患者进行了前瞻性研究(年龄为 61.2±11.8,女性占 24%)。成功血管再通后 24 小时进行超声心动图检查,并评估 TAPSE/PASP。记录了心血管疾病的院内死亡率:结果:确定心血管病院内死亡率的最佳TAPSE/PASP临界值为0.49 mm/mmHg。TAPSE/PASP≤0.49毫米/毫米汞柱的患者应考虑RV-PA解耦。左心室射血分数(LVEF)与 RV-PA 解耦独立相关。尽管成功进行了血管重建,但仍有 23 名(7.7%)患者在院内死亡。在调整全球心血管事件登记处(GRACE)风险评分和 LVEF 后,TAPSE/PASP 与院内死亡率独立相关(Odds Ratio 0.14,95% 置信区间 [0.03-0.56],P-value 0.007)。包括 GRACE 风险评分和 NT-pro-BNP 的基线模型(χ2 26.55)的预后价值在加入 LVEF ≤40 % 后显著提高(χ2 44.71,P-value 2 75.42,P-value 2 101.74,P-value 结论:血管再通后 24 小时超声心动图 TAPSE/PASP ≤0.49 mm/mmHg 评估的 RV-PA 解耦可改善首次急性心肌梗死后心血管住院死亡率的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
86
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (International Edition, ISSN 1109-9666) is the official journal of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology and aims to publish high-quality articles on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. A primary goal is to publish in each issue a number of original articles related to clinical and basic research. Many of these will be accompanied by invited editorial comments. Hot topics, such as molecular cardiology, and innovative cardiac imaging and electrophysiological mapping techniques, will appear frequently in the journal in the form of invited expert articles or special reports. The Editorial Committee also attaches great importance to subjects related to continuing medical education, the implementation of guidelines and cost effectiveness in cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Association between preoperative uric acid concentration and the occurrence of atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: An observational prospective study. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CTO PCI: analysis from the PROGRESS-CTO registry. Sports cardiology: not a sprint but a marathon-and, above all, a team sport. In Memoriam: George L. Bakris (1952-2024). Verification of persistent pulmonary vein isolation with electroanatomical mapping 3 months after ablation using a novel PFA platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1