Editor's Choice - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 24 Month Patency After Endovenous Stenting of Superior Vena Cava, Subclavian, and Brachiocephalic Vein Stenosis.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.07.006
Shreya Chawla, Qingwei Zhang, Adam M Gwozdz, James Wijaya, Buland Tiwana, Laura Tincknell, Benedict R H Turner, Stephen Black
{"title":"Editor's Choice - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 24 Month Patency After Endovenous Stenting of Superior Vena Cava, Subclavian, and Brachiocephalic Vein Stenosis.","authors":"Shreya Chawla, Qingwei Zhang, Adam M Gwozdz, James Wijaya, Buland Tiwana, Laura Tincknell, Benedict R H Turner, Stephen Black","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise recent evidence assessing patency outcomes at various time points in patients with superior vena cava, subclavian, and brachiocephalic vein stenosis who had undergone stenting.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies up to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Measured outcomes included technical success rate, primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency at various time points. A subgroup analysis was also conducted to compare malignant and benign obstruction. GRADE was used to assess the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty nine studies reporting outcomes in 1 539 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Primary patency up to one year after the procedure was 81.5% (95% CI 74.5 - 86.9%). Primary patency declined after one year to 63.2% (95% CI 51.9 - 73.1%) at 12 - 24 months. Primary assisted patency and secondary patency at ≥ 24 months were 72.7% (95% CI 49.1 - 88.0%) and 76.6% (95% CI 51.1 - 91.1%). In the subgroup analysis, primary patency was significantly higher in patients with a malignant stenosis compared with a benign stenosis at 1 - 3 and 12 - 24 months. No significant difference was seen for pooled secondary patency rates when comparing the malignant and benign subgroups. GRADE analysis determined the certainty of evidence for all outcomes to be very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stenting is an effective intervention for benign and malignant stenosis of the superior vena cava, subclavian, and brachiocephalic veins. Primary patency rates were good up to one year after the procedure, with 81.5% of stents retaining patency at 6 - 12 months. Patency rates declined after one year, to 63.2% primary and 89.3% secondary patency at 12 - 24 months, showing improved outcomes following re-intervention. High quality evidence is lacking. More research is needed to investigate patency outcomes and the need for surveillance or re-intervention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"139-155"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.07.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise recent evidence assessing patency outcomes at various time points in patients with superior vena cava, subclavian, and brachiocephalic vein stenosis who had undergone stenting.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies up to December 2022.

Review methods: Measured outcomes included technical success rate, primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency at various time points. A subgroup analysis was also conducted to compare malignant and benign obstruction. GRADE was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

Results: Thirty nine studies reporting outcomes in 1 539 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Primary patency up to one year after the procedure was 81.5% (95% CI 74.5 - 86.9%). Primary patency declined after one year to 63.2% (95% CI 51.9 - 73.1%) at 12 - 24 months. Primary assisted patency and secondary patency at ≥ 24 months were 72.7% (95% CI 49.1 - 88.0%) and 76.6% (95% CI 51.1 - 91.1%). In the subgroup analysis, primary patency was significantly higher in patients with a malignant stenosis compared with a benign stenosis at 1 - 3 and 12 - 24 months. No significant difference was seen for pooled secondary patency rates when comparing the malignant and benign subgroups. GRADE analysis determined the certainty of evidence for all outcomes to be very low.

Conclusion: Stenting is an effective intervention for benign and malignant stenosis of the superior vena cava, subclavian, and brachiocephalic veins. Primary patency rates were good up to one year after the procedure, with 81.5% of stents retaining patency at 6 - 12 months. Patency rates declined after one year, to 63.2% primary and 89.3% secondary patency at 12 - 24 months, showing improved outcomes following re-intervention. High quality evidence is lacking. More research is needed to investigate patency outcomes and the need for surveillance or re-intervention programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上腔静脉、锁骨下静脉和肱动脉狭窄静脉腔内支架置入术后 24 个月通畅率的系统回顾和 Meta 分析。
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估最近的证据,评估上腔静脉、锁骨下静脉和肱静脉狭窄患者接受支架治疗后不同时间点的通畅结果:检索了 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中截至 2022 年 12 月的研究:衡量的结果包括不同时间点的技术成功率、主要通畅率、主要辅助通畅率和次要通畅率。还进行了亚组分析,以比较恶性和良性梗阻。采用 GRADE 评估证据的确定性:荟萃分析纳入了39项研究,报告了1539名患者的治疗结果。术后一年内的原发性通畅率为 81.5%(95% CI 74.5 - 86.9%)。1 年后,12-24 个月的初次通畅率降至 63.2%(95% CI 51.9 - 73.1%)。≥24个月时的初次辅助通畅率和二次通畅率分别为72.7%(95% CI 49.1 - 88.0%)和76.6%(95% CI 51.1 - 91.1%)。在亚组分析中,恶性狭窄患者在1-3个月和12-24个月的一次通畅率明显高于良性狭窄患者。比较恶性和良性亚组时,汇总的二次通畅率无明显差异。GRADE分析认为所有结果的证据确定性都很低:支架植入术是治疗上腔静脉、锁骨下静脉和肱动脉良性和恶性狭窄的有效干预方法。术后一年内的初次通畅率良好,81.5%的支架在6-12个月内保持通畅。1 年后的通畅率有所下降,在 12-24 个月时,一级通畅率为 63.2%,二级通畅率为 89.3%,这表明再次介入后的效果有所改善。目前还缺乏高质量的证据。需要进行更多的研究,以调查通畅率的结果以及监测或再干预计划的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
期刊最新文献
Massive Dislodgement of an Infected Popliteal Stent Graft. A European Delphi Consensus on the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients with Heritable Aortic Diseases. Asymptomatic Splenic Artery Aneurysms: Innocent Bycatch or Ticking Time Bombs? Endovascular Ascending Aortic Repair: Experience Talks and Knowledge Listens. Gender Representation Among Speakers and Chairs at the European Society for Vascular Surgery Annual Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1