Applying chemical shift images (in-phase/opposed phased) for differentiating low-grade from high-grade glioma and comparison with magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s00117-024-01339-4
Bita Abbasi, Afshar Ghamari Khameneh, Hadi Zareh Soltaniye, Gisoo Darban Hosseini Amirkhiz, Ehsan Karimi, Reza Akhavan
{"title":"Applying chemical shift images (in-phase/opposed phased) for differentiating low-grade from high-grade glioma and comparison with magnetic resonance spectroscopy.","authors":"Bita Abbasi, Afshar Ghamari Khameneh, Hadi Zareh Soltaniye, Gisoo Darban Hosseini Amirkhiz, Ehsan Karimi, Reza Akhavan","doi":"10.1007/s00117-024-01339-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Grading gliomas is essential for treatment decisions and patient prognosis. In this study we evaluated the in-phase and out-of-phase sequences for distinguishing high-grade (HGG) from low-grade glioma (LGG) and the correlation with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study comprised patients with brain tumors referred to our center for brain MRS. The gold standard for diagnosis was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) glioma classification. A standard tumor protocol was accomplished using a 1.5‑T MRS scanner. Before contrast medium administration, extra in- and out-phase sequences were acquired. Three 20-30-mm<sup>2</sup> oval regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the solid component and the signal loss ratio (SLR) was calculated with the following formula: SLR <sub>tumor</sub> = (SI <sub>In phase</sub> - SI <sub>Opposed phase</sub>) / SI <sub>In phase</sub> Correlations and comparisons between groups were made using the Pearson, chi-square and, independent samples t tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20 patients were included in the LGG and 13 were included in the HGG group. The mean SLR in the HGG and LGG groups was 3.66 ± 2.12 and 1.63 ± 1.86, respectively (p = 0.01). There was a statistically significant correlation between lipid lactate (0.48, p = 0.004) and free lipid (0.44, p = 0.009) concentrations on MRS with SLR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SLR is a simple, rapid, and noninvasive marker for differentiating between LGG and HGG. There is a significant correlation with both the concentration and presence of free lipid and lipid-lactate peaks in MRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":74635,"journal":{"name":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"116-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-024-01339-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Grading gliomas is essential for treatment decisions and patient prognosis. In this study we evaluated the in-phase and out-of-phase sequences for distinguishing high-grade (HGG) from low-grade glioma (LGG) and the correlation with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) results.

Methods: This observational study comprised patients with brain tumors referred to our center for brain MRS. The gold standard for diagnosis was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) glioma classification. A standard tumor protocol was accomplished using a 1.5‑T MRS scanner. Before contrast medium administration, extra in- and out-phase sequences were acquired. Three 20-30-mm2 oval regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the solid component and the signal loss ratio (SLR) was calculated with the following formula: SLR tumor = (SI In phase - SI Opposed phase) / SI In phase Correlations and comparisons between groups were made using the Pearson, chi-square and, independent samples t tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: In total, 20 patients were included in the LGG and 13 were included in the HGG group. The mean SLR in the HGG and LGG groups was 3.66 ± 2.12 and 1.63 ± 1.86, respectively (p = 0.01). There was a statistically significant correlation between lipid lactate (0.48, p = 0.004) and free lipid (0.44, p = 0.009) concentrations on MRS with SLR.

Conclusions: The SLR is a simple, rapid, and noninvasive marker for differentiating between LGG and HGG. There is a significant correlation with both the concentration and presence of free lipid and lipid-lactate peaks in MRS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用化学位移图像(同相/异相)区分低级别和高级别胶质瘤,并与磁共振光谱进行比较。
背景:胶质瘤分级对治疗决策和患者预后至关重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了用于区分高级别胶质瘤(HGG)和低级别胶质瘤(LGG)的相位内和相位外序列,以及与磁共振波谱(MRS)结果的相关性:本观察性研究包括转诊至本中心进行脑 MRS 检查的脑肿瘤患者。诊断的金标准是基于世界卫生组织(WHO)的胶质瘤分类。使用 1.5-T MRS 扫描仪完成标准肿瘤方案。在使用造影剂之前,采集了额外的相内和相外序列。在实体部分放置三个 20-30 平方毫米的椭圆形感兴趣区(ROI),并按以下公式计算信号丢失率(SLR):肿瘤 SLR = (SI In phase - SI Opposed phase) / SI In phase 使用皮尔逊检验、卡方检验和独立样本 t 检验进行组间相关性和比较。为评估诊断效果,还进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。统计显著性以 p 为标准:共有 20 名患者被纳入 LGG 组,13 名患者被纳入 HGG 组。HGG 组和 LGG 组的平均 SLR 分别为 3.66 ± 2.12 和 1.63 ± 1.86(p = 0.01)。MRS上的乳酸脂质(0.48,p = 0.004)和游离脂质(0.44,p = 0.009)浓度与SLR之间存在统计学意义上的相关性:SLR是区分LGG和HGG的简单、快速、无创标记物。SLR与MRS中游离脂质和脂质乳酸盐峰的浓度和存在有明显的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[New innovations in cross-sectional imaging diagnostics of the aorta]. Mitteilungen des Berufsverbandes der Deutschen Radiologie. [Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast : What can we expect from the future?] [Importance of parametric and molecular imaging for therapeutic management of breast cancer]. [Parametric imaging in breast diagnostics : Computed tomography].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1