Caregivers and Clinic Providers View Soft Casts for Pediatric Hand Burns as Acceptable and Feasible: A Mixed Methods Survey.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae142
Jennifer M Schuh, Leanna L Linzell, Emmanuel L Abebrese, Katherine T Flynn-O'Brien
{"title":"Caregivers and Clinic Providers View Soft Casts for Pediatric Hand Burns as Acceptable and Feasible: A Mixed Methods Survey.","authors":"Jennifer M Schuh, Leanna L Linzell, Emmanuel L Abebrese, Katherine T Flynn-O'Brien","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soft casts have been introduced as an efficacious strategy to manage hand burns that simplifies wound care for families. We hypothesized that the outpatient use of soft casts in pediatric hand burns would be viewed as acceptable by patient caregivers and providers, logistically feasible, and result in satisfactory clinical outcomes. A review was performed of pediatric clinic patients managed with soft casts since implementation (9/2022-9/2023). Patient caregivers and providers were surveyed. The primary outcome was the acceptability of soft casts as a management strategy (questions targeted care burden, overall satisfaction, comfort, pragmatism, and healing concerns). The secondary outcome was feasibility (effect on clinic workflow, and efficiency). Survey responses were collected from 70% of caregivers and 95% of providers. Responses overwhelmingly favored soft cast acceptability. Among providers, 84% agreed that \"the soft cast method simplified the hand burn care experience in our clinic\" and 100% indicated \"the soft cast was easy for parents to manage at home\" (Likert range 7-10, mode 10). Thirty-three English-speaking patients with partial and full-thickness hand burns were managed with soft casts. A mean of 1.8 reapplications (mode 1, range 1-5) was required with a median healing time of 13 days. No infections were attributed to the use of soft casting, and only 1 patient ultimately required grafting. Overall, the introduction of soft casts as a management strategy for pediatric hand burns was acceptable and feasible. The clinical outcomes assessed suggest soft casts are associated with good wound healing with minimal wound care responsibilities for patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1413-1422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soft casts have been introduced as an efficacious strategy to manage hand burns that simplifies wound care for families. We hypothesized that the outpatient use of soft casts in pediatric hand burns would be viewed as acceptable by patient caregivers and providers, logistically feasible, and result in satisfactory clinical outcomes. A review was performed of pediatric clinic patients managed with soft casts since implementation (9/2022-9/2023). Patient caregivers and providers were surveyed. The primary outcome was the acceptability of soft casts as a management strategy (questions targeted care burden, overall satisfaction, comfort, pragmatism, and healing concerns). The secondary outcome was feasibility (effect on clinic workflow, and efficiency). Survey responses were collected from 70% of caregivers and 95% of providers. Responses overwhelmingly favored soft cast acceptability. Among providers, 84% agreed that "the soft cast method simplified the hand burn care experience in our clinic" and 100% indicated "the soft cast was easy for parents to manage at home" (Likert range 7-10, mode 10). Thirty-three English-speaking patients with partial and full-thickness hand burns were managed with soft casts. A mean of 1.8 reapplications (mode 1, range 1-5) was required with a median healing time of 13 days. No infections were attributed to the use of soft casting, and only 1 patient ultimately required grafting. Overall, the introduction of soft casts as a management strategy for pediatric hand burns was acceptable and feasible. The clinical outcomes assessed suggest soft casts are associated with good wound healing with minimal wound care responsibilities for patients and families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理人员和诊所提供者认为软石膏治疗小儿手部烧伤是可接受和可行的:混合方法调查。
软石膏是治疗手部烧伤的一种有效方法,可简化家属的伤口护理。我们的假设是,在门诊使用软石膏治疗儿科手部烧伤将被患者护理人员和医疗服务提供者视为可接受的治疗方法,在后勤方面也是可行的,并能产生令人满意的临床效果。我们对软石膏治疗实施以来(2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 9 月)的儿科门诊病人进行了回顾。对患者护理人员和医疗服务提供者进行了调查。主要结果是软石膏作为一种管理策略的可接受性(问题针对护理负担、总体满意度、舒适度、实用性和愈合问题)。次要结果是可行性(对诊所工作流程和效率的影响)。从 70% 的护理人员和 95% 的医疗服务提供者那里收集到了调查回复。绝大多数人赞成软石膏的可接受性。在医疗服务提供者中,84% 的人同意 "软石膏法简化了我们诊所的手部烧伤护理体验",100% 的人表示 "软石膏便于家长在家管理"(Likert 范围 7-10,模式 10)。有 33 名手部部分和全厚度烧伤的英语患者接受了软石膏治疗。平均需要重新使用 1.8 次(模式 1,范围 1-5),中位愈合时间为 13 天。使用软石膏后没有发生感染,只有一名患者最终需要植皮。总的来说,采用软石膏作为小儿手部烧伤的治疗策略是可以接受的,也是可行的。评估的临床结果表明,使用软石膏后伤口愈合良好,患者和家属只需承担极少的伤口护理责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Burn center versus burn unit, which is better? Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and its Use in Burn Wounds: An Updated Systematic Review. Burn Progression in Human Skin - A Review of Current Knowledge and Opportunities for Future Research. Unplanned Extubation in the Burn Unit: A Retrospective Review. Wildland Firefighters Suffer Increasing Risk of Job-Related Death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1