Associations between Historical Redlining and the Risk of Pregnancy Complications and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Massachusetts, 1995-2015.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2024.0031
Marissa Chan, Shivani Parikh, Emma Willcocks, Jennie Lytel-Sternberg, Edgar Castro, Loni Philip Tabb, Joel Schwartz, Tamarra James-Todd
{"title":"Associations between Historical Redlining and the Risk of Pregnancy Complications and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Massachusetts, 1995-2015.","authors":"Marissa Chan, Shivani Parikh, Emma Willcocks, Jennie Lytel-Sternberg, Edgar Castro, Loni Philip Tabb, Joel Schwartz, Tamarra James-Todd","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To assess the impact of historical redlining on the risk of pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes in Massachusetts (MA) from 1995 to 2015. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In total, 288,787 pregnant people from the MA Birth Registry had information on parental characteristics, pregnancy factors, and redlining data at parental residences at the time of delivery. Historic redlining data were based on MA Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) security maps, with grades assigned (A \"best,\" B \"still desirable,\" C \"definitely declining,\" and D \"hazardous\"). We used covariate-adjusted binomial regression models to examine associations between HOLC grade and each chronic condition and pregnancy/birth outcome. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Living in HOLC grades B through D compared with A was associated with an increased risk of entering pregnancy with chronic conditions and adverse pregnancy/birth outcomes. The strongest associations were seen with pregestational diabetes (adjusted risk ratio [RR] Grade D: 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3, 2.4) and chronic hypertension (adjusted RR Grade D: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.9). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Historical redlining policies from the 1930s were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and chronic conditions; associations were strongest for chronic conditions in pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"1308-1317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of historical redlining on the risk of pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes in Massachusetts (MA) from 1995 to 2015. Methods: In total, 288,787 pregnant people from the MA Birth Registry had information on parental characteristics, pregnancy factors, and redlining data at parental residences at the time of delivery. Historic redlining data were based on MA Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) security maps, with grades assigned (A "best," B "still desirable," C "definitely declining," and D "hazardous"). We used covariate-adjusted binomial regression models to examine associations between HOLC grade and each chronic condition and pregnancy/birth outcome. Results: Living in HOLC grades B through D compared with A was associated with an increased risk of entering pregnancy with chronic conditions and adverse pregnancy/birth outcomes. The strongest associations were seen with pregestational diabetes (adjusted risk ratio [RR] Grade D: 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3, 2.4) and chronic hypertension (adjusted RR Grade D: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.9). Conclusions: Historical redlining policies from the 1930s were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and chronic conditions; associations were strongest for chronic conditions in pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1995-2015 年马萨诸塞州历史上的赤贫与妊娠并发症和不良分娩结果风险之间的关联。
目的评估 1995 年至 2015 年间马萨诸塞州(MA)历史性红线对妊娠并发症和不良分娩结局风险的影响。研究方法马萨诸塞州出生登记处共有 288,787 名孕妇提供了父母特征、妊娠因素和分娩时父母居住地的重排数据。历史红线数据基于马萨诸塞州房屋所有者贷款公司(HOLC)的安全地图,并划分了等级(A 级 "最佳"、B 级 "仍然理想"、C 级 "肯定下降 "和 D 级 "危险")。我们使用协变量调整二项回归模型来研究 HOLC 等级与每种慢性病和怀孕/分娩结果之间的关系。结果显示与 A 级相比,生活在 HOLC B 级至 D 级的人群怀孕时患有慢性疾病的风险和不良妊娠/分娩结果的风险都会增加。与妊娠糖尿病的关系最为密切(D 级调整风险比 [RR]:1.7,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.3,2.4):1.3,2.4)和慢性高血压(调整后的 D 级风险比:1.5,95% 置信区间[CI]:1.1,1.9)。结论20 世纪 30 年代的历史性红线政策与不良妊娠结局和慢性疾病有关;妊娠期慢性疾病的相关性最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
期刊最新文献
Preeclampsia Prevention: Key to the Reduction of Maternal Mortality. Global Fertility Forecasts Through 2100: Relevance for Fertility Specialists. A Whole-of-Government Approach to Addressing the U.S. Maternal Health Crisis. Characteristics of Births Conceived Through Medically Assisted Reproduction by Parental Structure in Louisiana (2016-2023). Perceived Bias and U.S. Perinatal Health Care Quality: Implications for Practice and Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1