Retrospective clinical study of 842 clasp-retained removable partial dentures with a metal framework: survival, maintenance needs, and biologic findings.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Quintessence international Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b5566187
Silvia Brandt, Anna Winter, Hans-Christoph Lauer, Georgios Romanos
{"title":"Retrospective clinical study of 842 clasp-retained removable partial dentures with a metal framework: survival, maintenance needs, and biologic findings.","authors":"Silvia Brandt, Anna Winter, Hans-Christoph Lauer, Georgios Romanos","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5566187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate clasp-retained removable partial dentures (C-RPDs) with a metal framework for survival, maintenance requirements, and biologic implications.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>C-RPDs were retrospectively analyzed based on patient records. Treatment failure was defined as fracture of a framework component (metal base or connector) or loss of an abutment tooth. Other outcome variables included factors that might conceivably impact C-RPD survival (maxilla vs mandible, Kennedy classes, opposing dentitions, treatment by students vs certified dental practitioners), mobility and caries of abutment teeth (in relation to clasp designs), and maintenance requirements (relining, clasp or resin fractures). Differences were evaluated by appropriate statistical tests at the P ≤ .05 level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 612 patients (339 men, 273 women) 60.0 ± 11.5 years old at delivery were included, covering 842 C-RPDs and a mean observation period of 42.1 ± 33.2 months. Kaplan-Meier C-RPD survival was 76.2% after 5 years and 49.5% after 10 years. Biologic complications (ie, loss of abutment teeth) accounted for the vast majority (95.6%) of C-RPD failures, and Kaplan-Meier C-RPD survival was significantly better in the mandible (P = .015). Some clasp designs contributed significantly to caries and removal of abutment teeth (both P .05). No other significant differences were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tooth loss both emerges as the main cause of C-RPD failure and might be amenable to careful selection of clasp designs. Overall, better C-RPD survival should be expected in the mandible. A noncontributory role of Kennedy classes and opposing dentitions is tentatively suggested based on numerically heterogenous subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5566187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate clasp-retained removable partial dentures (C-RPDs) with a metal framework for survival, maintenance requirements, and biologic implications.

Method and materials: C-RPDs were retrospectively analyzed based on patient records. Treatment failure was defined as fracture of a framework component (metal base or connector) or loss of an abutment tooth. Other outcome variables included factors that might conceivably impact C-RPD survival (maxilla vs mandible, Kennedy classes, opposing dentitions, treatment by students vs certified dental practitioners), mobility and caries of abutment teeth (in relation to clasp designs), and maintenance requirements (relining, clasp or resin fractures). Differences were evaluated by appropriate statistical tests at the P ≤ .05 level.

Results: A total of 612 patients (339 men, 273 women) 60.0 ± 11.5 years old at delivery were included, covering 842 C-RPDs and a mean observation period of 42.1 ± 33.2 months. Kaplan-Meier C-RPD survival was 76.2% after 5 years and 49.5% after 10 years. Biologic complications (ie, loss of abutment teeth) accounted for the vast majority (95.6%) of C-RPD failures, and Kaplan-Meier C-RPD survival was significantly better in the mandible (P = .015). Some clasp designs contributed significantly to caries and removal of abutment teeth (both P .05). No other significant differences were noted.

Conclusion: Tooth loss both emerges as the main cause of C-RPD failure and might be amenable to careful selection of clasp designs. Overall, better C-RPD survival should be expected in the mandible. A noncontributory role of Kennedy classes and opposing dentitions is tentatively suggested based on numerically heterogenous subgroups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
842 枚金属框架扣式可摘局部义齿的回顾性临床研究:存活率、维护需求和生物学发现。
目的评估带有金属框架的带扣可摘局部义齿(C-RPD)的存活率、维护要求和生物学影响:根据患者记录对 C-RPD 进行回顾性分析。治疗失败的定义是框架部件(金属基托或连接体)断裂或基牙脱落。其他结果变量包括可能影响C-RPD存活率的因素(上颌与下颌、肯尼迪等级、对生牙、学生治疗与认证牙医治疗)、基牙的移动性和龋坏(与扣环设计有关)以及维护要求(重新衬垫、扣环或树脂断裂)。差异通过适当的统计检验进行评估,P ≤ .05 为差异水平:共纳入 612 名患者(男性 339 人,女性 273 人),分娩时年龄为 60.0 ± 11.5 岁,共进行了 842 次 C-RPD 治疗,平均观察时间为 42.1 ± 33.2 个月。卡普兰-米尔 C-RPD 5 年后存活率为 76.2%,10 年后存活率为 49.5%。生物并发症(即基牙脱落)占了C-RPD失败的绝大多数(95.6%),下颌骨的Kaplan-Meier C-RPD存活率明显更高(P = .015)。一些卡环设计明显导致基牙龋坏和脱落(P 均 < .05)。结论:结论:牙齿脱落是导致 C-RPD 失败的主要原因,仔细选择牙扣设计可能会有所帮助。总体而言,下颌骨的 C-RPD 成活率更高。根据数量上的异质性亚组,初步认为肯尼迪等级和对生牙的作用并不重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two treatment modalities in the management of gingival enlargement during orthodontic treatment: a randomized clinical trial. The effects of photobiomodulation and/or azithromycin treatment on bone resorption biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid from patients with stage III-IV grade C periodontitis. Zirconia endocrown with intracanal extension and zirconia posts on maxillary molars: in silicio study. Retrospective clinical study of 842 clasp-retained removable partial dentures with a metal framework: survival, maintenance needs, and biologic findings. Preventative dental practices and cardiometabolic health in adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1