Systematic review and meta analysis of psychological interventions to prevent or treat pediatric chronic disease in rural communities.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Pediatric Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsae054
Brittany D Lancaster, Tristen Hefner, Calissa J Leslie-Miller, Kody Sexton, Dana M Bakula, Jason Van Allen, Christopher C Cushing, Crystal S Lim, David M Janicke, Elissa Jelalian, Katie Dayani, Ann M Davis
{"title":"Systematic review and meta analysis of psychological interventions to prevent or treat pediatric chronic disease in rural communities.","authors":"Brittany D Lancaster, Tristen Hefner, Calissa J Leslie-Miller, Kody Sexton, Dana M Bakula, Jason Van Allen, Christopher C Cushing, Crystal S Lim, David M Janicke, Elissa Jelalian, Katie Dayani, Ann M Davis","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsae054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of psychological interventions at improving physical or mental health outcomes for youth living in rural communities who have, or are at-risk for, any chronic medical condition in comparison to control interventions conducted in rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following prospective registration (OSF.IO/7TDQJ), 7 databases were searched through July 1, 2023. Studies were included if they were a randomized control trial of a psychological intervention conducted with youth living in a rural area who had, or were at-risk for, a chronic medical condition. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias version 2 tool. A qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 studies met inclusion criteria. Obesity studies (n = 13) primarily focused on body mass index metrics, with limited significant findings across studies. Asthma treatment interventions (n = 2) showed no impact on hospitalizations. 3 studies evaluated mental health outcomes with no significant group differences observed. We meta-analytically analyzed 9 studies that evaluated body mass index z-scores and identified an overall null effect (Hedge's g = 0.01, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.09], p = .85).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most included studies focused on pediatric obesity, and there was a limited range of health outcomes reported. Compared to controls, minimal significant improvements in health outcomes were identified for psychological interventions for youth living in rural communities. Future efforts may benefit from situating this work more systematically within a health disparities framework with a focus on understanding mechanisms of disparities and translating this work into interventions and policy changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of psychological interventions at improving physical or mental health outcomes for youth living in rural communities who have, or are at-risk for, any chronic medical condition in comparison to control interventions conducted in rural communities.

Methods: Following prospective registration (OSF.IO/7TDQJ), 7 databases were searched through July 1, 2023. Studies were included if they were a randomized control trial of a psychological intervention conducted with youth living in a rural area who had, or were at-risk for, a chronic medical condition. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias version 2 tool. A qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted.

Results: 15 studies met inclusion criteria. Obesity studies (n = 13) primarily focused on body mass index metrics, with limited significant findings across studies. Asthma treatment interventions (n = 2) showed no impact on hospitalizations. 3 studies evaluated mental health outcomes with no significant group differences observed. We meta-analytically analyzed 9 studies that evaluated body mass index z-scores and identified an overall null effect (Hedge's g = 0.01, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.09], p = .85).

Conclusions: Most included studies focused on pediatric obesity, and there was a limited range of health outcomes reported. Compared to controls, minimal significant improvements in health outcomes were identified for psychological interventions for youth living in rural communities. Future efforts may benefit from situating this work more systematically within a health disparities framework with a focus on understanding mechanisms of disparities and translating this work into interventions and policy changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对农村社区预防或治疗儿科慢性病的心理干预进行系统回顾和元分析。
研究目的本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究心理干预与农村社区对照干预相比,在改善居住在农村社区、患有或有可能患有任何慢性疾病的青少年的身体或心理健康结果方面的有效性:通过前瞻性注册(OSF.IO/7TDQJ),检索了 7 个数据库,检索期至 2023 年 7 月 1 日。如果研究是针对生活在农村地区、患有慢性病或有慢性病风险的青少年进行的心理干预随机对照试验,则被纳入研究范围。偏倚风险采用 Cochrane 第 2 版偏倚风险工具进行评估。结果:15 项研究符合纳入标准:15项研究符合纳入标准。肥胖症研究(13 项)主要关注体重指数指标,各研究的重要发现有限。哮喘治疗干预(2 项)对住院率没有影响。3 项研究对心理健康结果进行了评估,未观察到明显的组间差异。我们对 9 项评估身体质量指数 z 值的研究进行了元分析,发现总体效果为零(Hedge's g = 0.01,95% CI [-0.07,0.09],p = .85):结论:大多数纳入研究的重点是小儿肥胖症,报告的健康结果范围有限。与对照组相比,对生活在农村社区的青少年进行心理干预对健康结果的改善微乎其微。未来的工作可能会受益于将这项工作更系统地置于健康差异框架内,重点是了解差异机制,并将这项工作转化为干预措施和政策变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
期刊最新文献
"Being alone for a whole year [is hard]" Families reflect on the emotional toll of stem cell transplantation for sickle cell disease. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of psychological interventions on anxiety in children and youth with chronic medical conditions. Caregivers' physiological responses during toddler vaccinations: associations with psychological and behavioral responses. Systematic review and meta-analysis of combined cognitive-behavioral therapy and physical activity and exercise interventions for pediatric chronic disease. Temporal summation of pain in sickle cell disease: comparison of adolescents and young adults with chronic vs. infrequent pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1