Training and Verification Requirements for Interpretation of Cardiac CT and MRI: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

IF 4.7 2区医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING American Journal of Roentgenology Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.2214/AJR.24.31524

Prabhakar Shantha Rajiah, Matthew Budoff, Brian Ghoshhajra, Michael F Morris, Daniel Ocazionez-Trujillo, Karen Ordovas, Amit R Patel, Praveen Ranganath, Daniel Vargas, Pamela K Woodard, Andrew D Choi

{"title":"Training and Verification Requirements for Interpretation of Cardiac CT and MRI: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.","authors":"Prabhakar Shantha Rajiah, Matthew Budoff, Brian Ghoshhajra, Michael F Morris, Daniel Ocazionez-Trujillo, Karen Ordovas, Amit R Patel, Praveen Ranganath, Daniel Vargas, Pamela K Woodard, Andrew D Choi","doi":"10.2214/AJR.24.31524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of cardiac CT and MRI is rapidly expanding based on strong evidence from large international trials. The number of physicians competent to interpret cardiac CT and MRI may be unable to keep pace with the increasing demand. Societies and organizations have prescribed training requirements for interpreting cardiac CT and MRI, with recent updates focusing on the increased breadth of competency that is now required due to ongoing imaging advances. In this AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review, we discuss several aspects of cardiac CT and MRI training, focusing on topics that are uncertain or not addressed in existing society statements and guidelines, including determination of competency in different practice types in real-world settings and the impact of artificial intelligence on training and education. The article is intended to guide updates in professional society training requirements and also inform institutional verification processes.","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.24.31524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of cardiac CT and MRI is rapidly expanding based on strong evidence from large international trials. The number of physicians competent to interpret cardiac CT and MRI may be unable to keep pace with the increasing demand. Societies and organizations have prescribed training requirements for interpreting cardiac CT and MRI, with recent updates focusing on the increased breadth of competency that is now required due to ongoing imaging advances. In this AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review, we discuss several aspects of cardiac CT and MRI training, focusing on topics that are uncertain or not addressed in existing society statements and guidelines, including determination of competency in different practice types in real-world settings and the impact of artificial intelligence on training and education. The article is intended to guide updates in professional society training requirements and also inform institutional verification processes.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

解读心脏 CT 和 MRI 的培训和验证要求：AJR 专家小组叙述性审查。

基于大型国际试验的有力证据，心脏 CT 和 MRI 的使用正在迅速扩大。有能力解读心脏 CT 和 MRI 的医生数量可能无法满足日益增长的需求。各学会和组织已规定了解读心脏 CT 和 MRI 的培训要求，最近的更新侧重于因成像技术的不断进步而要求的能力广度。在这篇 AJR 专家小组叙述性评论中，我们讨论了心脏 CT 和 MRI 培训的几个方面，重点关注现有学会声明和指南中不确定或未涉及的主题，包括在真实世界环境中确定不同实践类型的能力以及人工智能对培训和教育的影响。文章旨在为专业学会培训要求的更新提供指导，并为机构验证过程提供信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

American Journal of Roentgenology 医学-核医学

CiteScore

12.80

自引率

4.00%

发文量

920

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.