Prevalence of limbal stem cell deficiency at an academic referral center over a two-year period.

Frontiers in ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fopht.2024.1392106
Jason S Goldberg, Daniel J Fraser, Joshua H Hou
{"title":"Prevalence of limbal stem cell deficiency at an academic referral center over a two-year period.","authors":"Jason S Goldberg, Daniel J Fraser, Joshua H Hou","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2024.1392106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) in the setting of a tertiary referral cornea practice at an academic center.</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all unique medical record numbers (MRNs) presenting to a single cornea specialist (JHH) at the University of Minnesota during calendar years 2019 and 2020. Records were queried and confirmed for a diagnosis of LSCD. Clinical characteristics of identified patients, including demographics, etiology of LSCD, severity of LSCD, treatment, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at final follow-up, were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 1436 unique MRNs were identified over the study period. There were 61 individuals (91 eyes) diagnosed with LSCD, resulting in a prevalence of 4.25% (95% CI, 3.33-5.42). Of 91 eyes, 60 eyes were bilateral (65.9%). Among all eyes, ocular surface burns were the most common etiology (18.7%) followed by iatrogenic or medicamentosa (15.4%). There were 51 eyes (56.0%) that underwent some form of transplantation. The median BCVA at final follow-up was Snellen 20/80 (range 20/20 to no light perception).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of LSCD found at a cornea subspecialty tertiary referral center in our study was much higher than previously reported prevalence rates. This may reflect referral bias and potential underdiagnosis of LSCD in practices outside of subspecialty referral centers. The high prevalence rate in our study also suggests that LSCD patients are concentrated in subspecialty referral practices, with many having high morbidity disease. This constitutes a major health burden for these practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2024.1392106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) in the setting of a tertiary referral cornea practice at an academic center.

Patient and methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all unique medical record numbers (MRNs) presenting to a single cornea specialist (JHH) at the University of Minnesota during calendar years 2019 and 2020. Records were queried and confirmed for a diagnosis of LSCD. Clinical characteristics of identified patients, including demographics, etiology of LSCD, severity of LSCD, treatment, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at final follow-up, were documented.

Results: In total 1436 unique MRNs were identified over the study period. There were 61 individuals (91 eyes) diagnosed with LSCD, resulting in a prevalence of 4.25% (95% CI, 3.33-5.42). Of 91 eyes, 60 eyes were bilateral (65.9%). Among all eyes, ocular surface burns were the most common etiology (18.7%) followed by iatrogenic or medicamentosa (15.4%). There were 51 eyes (56.0%) that underwent some form of transplantation. The median BCVA at final follow-up was Snellen 20/80 (range 20/20 to no light perception).

Conclusions: The prevalence of LSCD found at a cornea subspecialty tertiary referral center in our study was much higher than previously reported prevalence rates. This may reflect referral bias and potential underdiagnosis of LSCD in practices outside of subspecialty referral centers. The high prevalence rate in our study also suggests that LSCD patients are concentrated in subspecialty referral practices, with many having high morbidity disease. This constitutes a major health burden for these practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一家学术转诊中心两年内患瓣膜干细胞缺乏症的比例。
目的:评估学术中心角膜病三级转诊诊所中角膜缘干细胞缺乏症(LSCD)的发病率和临床特征:对病历进行回顾性审查,以确定2019年和2020年期间向明尼苏达大学的一位角膜病专家(JHH)就诊的所有唯一病历号(MRN)。对记录进行了查询并确诊为 LSCD。记录了已确诊患者的临床特征,包括人口统计学、LSCD 的病因、LSCD 的严重程度、治疗和最终随访时的最佳矫正视力 (BCVA):研究期间共发现了 1436 个独特的 MRN。有 61 人(91 只眼)被诊断为 LSCD,患病率为 4.25%(95% CI,3.33-5.42)。在 91 只眼睛中,60 只为双眼(65.9%)。在所有眼睛中,眼表烧伤是最常见的病因(18.7%),其次是先天性或药物性(15.4%)。51只眼睛(56.0%)接受了某种形式的移植手术。最后随访时的 BCVA 中位数为斯奈伦 20/80(范围从 20/20 到无光感):结论:在我们的研究中,角膜亚专科三级转诊中心发现的 LSCD 患病率远高于之前报道的患病率。这可能反映了转诊偏差以及亚专科转诊中心以外的医疗机构对 LSCD 的潜在诊断不足。我们研究中的高患病率还表明,LSCD 患者主要集中在亚专科转诊诊所,其中许多人患有高发病率疾病。这给这些诊疗机构带来了沉重的健康负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100. UV light and the ocular lens: a review of exposure models and resulting biomolecular changes. Diagnostic accuracy of a modularized, virtual-reality-based automated pupillometer for detection of relative afferent pupillary defect in unilateral optic neuropathies. Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Large animal model species in pluripotent stem cell therapy research and development for retinal diseases: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1