Screening tools to evaluate the neurotoxic potential of botanicals: building a strategy to assess safety.

Jyotshna Kanungo, Barbara C Sorkin, Julie Krzykwa, Constance A Mitchell, Michelle Embry, Peter Spencer, G Jean Harry, Jason Cannon, Fang Liu, Christopher A McPherson, Stefan Gafner, Remco H S Westerink
{"title":"Screening tools to evaluate the neurotoxic potential of botanicals: building a strategy to assess safety.","authors":"Jyotshna Kanungo, Barbara C Sorkin, Julie Krzykwa, Constance A Mitchell, Michelle Embry, Peter Spencer, G Jean Harry, Jason Cannon, Fang Liu, Christopher A McPherson, Stefan Gafner, Remco H S Westerink","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2024.2378895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This paper outlines the selection of NAMs, including in vitro assays using primary rat cortical neurons, zebrafish embryos, and <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>. These assays aim to assess neurotoxic endpoints such as neuronal activity and behavioral responses. Microelectrode array recordings of rat cortical neurons provide insights into the impact of botanical extracts on neuronal function, while the zebrafish embryos and <i>C. elegans</i> assays evaluate neurobehavioral responses. The paper also provides an account of the selection of botanical case studies based on expert judgment and existing neuroactivity/toxicity information. The proposed battery of assays will be tested with these case studies to evaluate their utility for neurotoxicity screening.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The complexity of botanicals necessitates the use of multiple NAMs for effective neurotoxicity screening. This paper discusses the evaluation of methodologies to develop a robust framework for evaluating botanical safety, including complex neuronal models and key neurodevelopmental process assays. It aims to establish a comprehensive screening framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":94005,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"629-646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2024.2378895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Areas covered: This paper outlines the selection of NAMs, including in vitro assays using primary rat cortical neurons, zebrafish embryos, and Caenorhabditis elegans. These assays aim to assess neurotoxic endpoints such as neuronal activity and behavioral responses. Microelectrode array recordings of rat cortical neurons provide insights into the impact of botanical extracts on neuronal function, while the zebrafish embryos and C. elegans assays evaluate neurobehavioral responses. The paper also provides an account of the selection of botanical case studies based on expert judgment and existing neuroactivity/toxicity information. The proposed battery of assays will be tested with these case studies to evaluate their utility for neurotoxicity screening.

Expert opinion: The complexity of botanicals necessitates the use of multiple NAMs for effective neurotoxicity screening. This paper discusses the evaluation of methodologies to develop a robust framework for evaluating botanical safety, including complex neuronal models and key neurodevelopmental process assays. It aims to establish a comprehensive screening framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估植物药潜在神经毒性的筛选工具:建立安全评估战略。
涉及领域:本文概述了 NAMs 的选择,包括使用原代大鼠皮层神经元、斑马鱼胚胎和秀丽隐杆线虫进行体外试验。这些试验旨在评估神经元活动和行为反应等神经毒性终点。对大鼠皮层神经元的微电极阵列记录有助于深入了解植物提取物对神经元功能的影响,而斑马鱼胚胎和秀丽隐杆线虫试验则评估神经行为反应。论文还介绍了根据专家判断和现有神经活性/毒性信息选择植物案例研究的情况。将利用这些案例研究对拟议的检测方法进行测试,以评估其在神经毒性筛选方面的实用性:植物药的复杂性要求使用多种 NAM 进行有效的神经毒性筛选。本文讨论了对各种方法进行评估的情况,以建立一个稳健的植物药安全性评估框架,包括复杂的神经元模型和关键的神经发育过程测定。其目的是建立一个全面的筛选框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transporters and drug secretion into human breast milk. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of drugs for alopecia: a comprehensive review. Evaluating the synergistic use of advanced liver models and AI for the prediction of drug-induced liver injury. A comprehensive review of the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin. Drug interactions in people with HIV treated with antivirals for other viral illnesses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1