Ongoing and planned Randomized Controlled Trials of AI in medicine: An analysis of Clinicaltrials.gov registration data

mattia andreoletti, Berkay Senkalfa, Alessandro Blasimme
{"title":"Ongoing and planned Randomized Controlled Trials of AI in medicine: An analysis of Clinicaltrials.gov registration data","authors":"mattia andreoletti, Berkay Senkalfa, Alessandro Blasimme","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies into clinical practice holds significant promise for revolutionizing healthcare. However, the realization of this potential requires rigorous evaluation and validation of AI applications to ensure their safety, efficacy, and clinical significance. Despite increasing awareness of the need for robust testing, the majority of AI-related Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) so far have exhibited notable limitations, impeding the generalizability and proper integration of their findings into clinical settings. To understand whether the field is progressing towards more robust testing, we conducted an analysis of the registration data of ongoing and planned RCTs of AI in medicine available in the Clinicaltrials.gov database. Our analysis highlights several key trends and challenges. Effectively addressing these challenges is essential for advancing the field of medical AI and ensuring its successful integration into clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":501454,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies into clinical practice holds significant promise for revolutionizing healthcare. However, the realization of this potential requires rigorous evaluation and validation of AI applications to ensure their safety, efficacy, and clinical significance. Despite increasing awareness of the need for robust testing, the majority of AI-related Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) so far have exhibited notable limitations, impeding the generalizability and proper integration of their findings into clinical settings. To understand whether the field is progressing towards more robust testing, we conducted an analysis of the registration data of ongoing and planned RCTs of AI in medicine available in the Clinicaltrials.gov database. Our analysis highlights several key trends and challenges. Effectively addressing these challenges is essential for advancing the field of medical AI and ensuring its successful integration into clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正在进行和计划进行的人工智能医学随机对照试验:对 Clinicaltrials.gov 注册数据的分析
人工智能(AI)技术与临床实践的结合为医疗保健带来了巨大的变革前景。然而,要实现这一潜力,需要对人工智能应用进行严格的评估和验证,以确保其安全性、有效性和临床意义。尽管人们越来越意识到需要进行强有力的测试,但迄今为止,大多数与人工智能相关的随机对照试验(RCT)都表现出明显的局限性,阻碍了其研究结果在临床环境中的推广和适当整合。为了了解该领域是否正在朝着更稳健的测试方向发展,我们对 Clinicaltrials.gov 数据库中正在进行和计划进行的人工智能医学随机对照试验的注册数据进行了分析。我们的分析强调了几个主要趋势和挑战。有效应对这些挑战对于推动医学人工智能领域的发展并确保其成功融入临床实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case is not a case is not a case - challenges and solutions in determining urolithiasis caseloads using the digital infrastructure of a clinical data warehouse Reliable Online Auditory Cognitive Testing: An observational study Federated Multiple Imputation for Variables that Are Missing Not At Random in Distributed Electronic Health Records Characterizing the connection between Parkinson's disease progression and healthcare utilization Generative AI and Large Language Models in Reducing Medication Related Harm and Adverse Drug Events - A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1