Green Supply Chain Management: Practices and Drivers in the Ethiopian Leather and Leather Product Industry

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of the Knowledge Economy Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s13132-024-02180-9
Tigist Berkesa, Xavier Gellynck, Hans De Steur, Marcia Dutra de Barcellos
{"title":"Green Supply Chain Management: Practices and Drivers in the Ethiopian Leather and Leather Product Industry","authors":"Tigist Berkesa, Xavier Gellynck, Hans De Steur, Marcia Dutra de Barcellos","doi":"10.1007/s13132-024-02180-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Green supply chain management practices (GSCMPs) and their driving factors have been extensively studied globally, yet specific industry contexts remain underexplored. This study provides a pioneering assessment of GSCMPs within the Ethiopian leather and leather products industry. The primary objective is to evaluate the implementation level of strategic and operational GSCMPs and to identify the driving factors influencing their adoption, categorized broadly into institutional pressures (coercive, normative, and mimetic) and internal factors. Additionally, the role of firm-specific characteristics in adopting green practices is investigated. Data were collected from 118 firms between January and June of 2023 using a survey questionnaire adapted from existing literature. A descriptive analysis and partial least square-structural equation modeling were used to explore the current state of GSCMPs and to test the proposed hypotheses. Multi-group analysis was also carried out to examine the impact of the firm-specific characteristics. The results showed that although the industry’s GSCMPs are still in their infancy, tanneries, mature aged firms, large and medium-sized enterprises, and exporting firms have relatively better green practices. Besides, all institutional pressures had a significant positive effect on the GSCMPs in terms of driving factors, but internal factors did not. This suggests a possible lack of internal commitment to environmental sustainability within firms. Significant differences in the factors driving green practices are noted, particularly among exporters, footwear manufacturers, and mid-aged firms. The findings highlight the need to comprehend and address these institutional pressures to enhance environmental management practices in industries like the Ethiopian leather sector. As a result, this study will have implications for both policymakers and practitioners for making an informed decision, as the country’s vision of achieving middle income by 2025 through a green economy and sustainable development is not supported by the current level of the GSCMPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02180-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green supply chain management practices (GSCMPs) and their driving factors have been extensively studied globally, yet specific industry contexts remain underexplored. This study provides a pioneering assessment of GSCMPs within the Ethiopian leather and leather products industry. The primary objective is to evaluate the implementation level of strategic and operational GSCMPs and to identify the driving factors influencing their adoption, categorized broadly into institutional pressures (coercive, normative, and mimetic) and internal factors. Additionally, the role of firm-specific characteristics in adopting green practices is investigated. Data were collected from 118 firms between January and June of 2023 using a survey questionnaire adapted from existing literature. A descriptive analysis and partial least square-structural equation modeling were used to explore the current state of GSCMPs and to test the proposed hypotheses. Multi-group analysis was also carried out to examine the impact of the firm-specific characteristics. The results showed that although the industry’s GSCMPs are still in their infancy, tanneries, mature aged firms, large and medium-sized enterprises, and exporting firms have relatively better green practices. Besides, all institutional pressures had a significant positive effect on the GSCMPs in terms of driving factors, but internal factors did not. This suggests a possible lack of internal commitment to environmental sustainability within firms. Significant differences in the factors driving green practices are noted, particularly among exporters, footwear manufacturers, and mid-aged firms. The findings highlight the need to comprehend and address these institutional pressures to enhance environmental management practices in industries like the Ethiopian leather sector. As a result, this study will have implications for both policymakers and practitioners for making an informed decision, as the country’s vision of achieving middle income by 2025 through a green economy and sustainable development is not supported by the current level of the GSCMPs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色供应链管理:埃塞俄比亚皮革和皮革制品业的实践与驱动因素
绿色供应链管理实践(GSCMPs)及其驱动因素已在全球范围内得到广泛研究,但对具体行业背景的研究仍然不足。本研究开创性地评估了埃塞俄比亚皮革和皮革制品行业的 GSCMP。主要目的是评估战略和运营 GSCMP 的实施水平,并确定影响其采用的驱动因素,大致分为制度压力(强制、规范和模仿)和内部因素。此外,还研究了企业特定特征在采用绿色实践中的作用。数据收集于 2023 年 1 月至 6 月间的 118 家企业,采用的是根据现有文献改编的调查问卷。采用描述性分析和偏最小二乘法-结构方程模型来探索 GSCMP 的现状,并检验提出的假设。此外,还进行了多组分析,以研究企业特定特征的影响。结果表明,虽然行业的 GSCMP 仍处于起步阶段,但制革厂、成熟的老企业、大中型企业和出口企业的绿色实践相对较好。此外,从驱动因素来看,所有制度压力都对 GSCMP 有显著的积极影响,但内部因素却没有。这表明企业内部可能缺乏对环境可持续发展的承诺。在推动绿色实践的因素方面存在显著差异,尤其是在出口商、鞋类制造商和中型企业之间。研究结果突出表明,有必要了解和应对这些制度压力,以加强埃塞俄比亚皮革业等行业的环境管理实践。因此,本研究将对政策制定者和从业人员做出明智决策产生影响,因为该国通过绿色经济和可持续发展实现到 2025 年达到中等收入水平的愿景并没有得到《全球供应链管理政策》现有水平的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.
期刊最新文献
An Engagement Between Faculty Adeptness, Learner’s Expectations, Usage of Technology, and Perceived Learner’s Learning Outcome: Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence Impact of Mobile Money on Resilience to Health Shocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Togo The Fishing and Aquaculture Production of Latin America with Respect to the Trade Balance and Foreign Investment Effects of ICTs on Labor Productivity: A Re-examination of Solow’s Paradox Through the Prism of the Joint Use of ICT Tools in Cameroonian Firms Career Imprints from Diverse Institutional Settings: a Comparative Study of Academic and Non-academic Partnered Ventures in Technopolis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1