Comparative Analysis of the Neutron–Gamma Discrimination Methods for Scintillators Based on Lithium Glass

IF 0.4 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Instruments and Experimental Techniques Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1134/s0020441224700465
E. S. Kuzmin, G. D. Bokuchava, I. Yu. Zimin, A. A. Kruglov, N. A. Kuchinskiy, V. L. Malyshev
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Neutron–Gamma Discrimination Methods for Scintillators Based on Lithium Glass","authors":"E. S. Kuzmin, G. D. Bokuchava, I. Yu. Zimin, A. A. Kruglov, N. A. Kuchinskiy, V. L. Malyshev","doi":"10.1134/s0020441224700465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">\n<b>Abstract</b>—</h3><p>The characteristics of neutron scintillation detectors built on monolithic and heterogeneous scintillators containing <sup>6</sup>Li were studied. The detectors were tested on a thermal neutron beam and on a stand with a source of γ-quanta <sup>60</sup>Co. To process the signals received from the detector with a monolithic scintillator, three different γ-radiation discrimination algorithms were used: registration of pulses at a constant threshold and selection according to the pulse shape using two digital signal separation methods: charge integration and pulse duration measurement. For a homogeneous scintillator, pulse shape selection methods work approximately the same when separating thermal neutrons and γ-quanta and are significantly inferior to the method of registration at a constant threshold. In this case, the quality of the <i>n</i>/γ separation is worse than the result obtained with a heterogeneous scintillator when recording at a constant threshold. The purpose of the work is to compare the results of using digital methods for discrimination of gamma-quanta with the results obtained using heterogeneous scintillators.</p>","PeriodicalId":587,"journal":{"name":"Instruments and Experimental Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Instruments and Experimental Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s0020441224700465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The characteristics of neutron scintillation detectors built on monolithic and heterogeneous scintillators containing 6Li were studied. The detectors were tested on a thermal neutron beam and on a stand with a source of γ-quanta 60Co. To process the signals received from the detector with a monolithic scintillator, three different γ-radiation discrimination algorithms were used: registration of pulses at a constant threshold and selection according to the pulse shape using two digital signal separation methods: charge integration and pulse duration measurement. For a homogeneous scintillator, pulse shape selection methods work approximately the same when separating thermal neutrons and γ-quanta and are significantly inferior to the method of registration at a constant threshold. In this case, the quality of the n/γ separation is worse than the result obtained with a heterogeneous scintillator when recording at a constant threshold. The purpose of the work is to compare the results of using digital methods for discrimination of gamma-quanta with the results obtained using heterogeneous scintillators.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于锂玻璃的闪烁体的中子-伽马鉴别方法比较分析
摘要 研究了由含 6Li 的单片和异质闪烁体构成的中子闪烁探测器的特性。在热中子束和装有 60Co γ 量子源的台架上对探测器进行了测试。为了处理从带有单片闪烁体的探测器接收到的信号,使用了三种不同的 γ 辐射判别算法:在恒定阈值下对脉冲进行登记,以及使用两种数字信号分离方法(电荷积分和脉冲持续时间测量)根据脉冲形状进行选择。对于均质闪烁体,在分离热中子和γ-量子时,脉冲形状选择方法的效果大致相同,但明显不如在恒定阈值下注册的方法。在这种情况下,n/γ 量子分离的质量比使用异质闪烁体在恒定阈值下记录的结果要差。这项工作的目的是比较用数字方法分辨伽马量子和用异质闪烁体分辨伽马量子的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Instruments and Experimental Techniques
Instruments and Experimental Techniques 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Instruments and Experimental Techniques is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes reviews describing advanced methods for physical measurements and techniques and original articles that present techniques for physical measurements, principles of operation, design, methods of application, and analysis of the operation of physical instruments used in all fields of experimental physics and when conducting measurements using physical methods and instruments in astronomy, natural sciences, chemistry, biology, medicine, and ecology.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the Thermal Outgassing from P43 Phosphor and Aerogel for Use in the Vacuum System of the SRF SKIF An Active Vibration Isolator for the Space Optical Clock Application of Glass Capillaries with an Outer Diameter of Less Than One Micrometer in a Manipulator Made Based on an Atomic Force Microscope Comparison of Phase Extraction Methods on the Example of the PN-3 Microwave Interferometer Penning Ion Source in Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1