Dismissal regulation and hiring and dismissal decisions: a decisive factor? the case of the French labor market reforms

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS European Journal of Law and Economics Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s10657-024-09805-z
Camille Signoretto
{"title":"Dismissal regulation and hiring and dismissal decisions: a decisive factor? the case of the French labor market reforms","authors":"Camille Signoretto","doi":"10.1007/s10657-024-09805-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Following the example of other European countries in recent years, two major reforms of dismissal regulation were implemented in France in 2016 and 2017. The aim of this article is to assess, from a microeconomic perspective, the effects of these reforms on the hiring and dismissal decisions of French firms. Does making dismissals easier increase dismissals and stimulate hiring? We also ask what is the role of this institutional factor in firms' decisions relative to two other factors: the strategies used by firms in their use of the law and in the management of their workforce; as well as the aggregate effects or the business climate. To this end, we constructed an original database that follows a panel of firms between 2016 and 2019. To take into account the great heterogeneity of employment management practices across firm sizes, this database is then divided into 4 bases—from very, very small firms (fewer than 5 employees) to large firms (50 employees or more). Based on the estimation of several fixed-effects models, we show that the reforms may have played a role in employment decisions, but only in hiring, and especially for small firms (less than 10 employees). However, for these small firms, hiring decisions are also, if not more, driven by employee departures in a human resource management logic. Large firms however are less affected. Finally, aggregate effects reflecting the macroeconomic business climate largely explain the trend in hiring and dismissals over the period, except in the case of large firms, where changes in individual practices may have had a temporary effect on these trends without changing the overall trend.</p>","PeriodicalId":51664,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Law and Economics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-024-09805-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the example of other European countries in recent years, two major reforms of dismissal regulation were implemented in France in 2016 and 2017. The aim of this article is to assess, from a microeconomic perspective, the effects of these reforms on the hiring and dismissal decisions of French firms. Does making dismissals easier increase dismissals and stimulate hiring? We also ask what is the role of this institutional factor in firms' decisions relative to two other factors: the strategies used by firms in their use of the law and in the management of their workforce; as well as the aggregate effects or the business climate. To this end, we constructed an original database that follows a panel of firms between 2016 and 2019. To take into account the great heterogeneity of employment management practices across firm sizes, this database is then divided into 4 bases—from very, very small firms (fewer than 5 employees) to large firms (50 employees or more). Based on the estimation of several fixed-effects models, we show that the reforms may have played a role in employment decisions, but only in hiring, and especially for small firms (less than 10 employees). However, for these small firms, hiring decisions are also, if not more, driven by employee departures in a human resource management logic. Large firms however are less affected. Finally, aggregate effects reflecting the macroeconomic business climate largely explain the trend in hiring and dismissals over the period, except in the case of large firms, where changes in individual practices may have had a temporary effect on these trends without changing the overall trend.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解雇条例与雇佣和解雇决定:法国劳动力市场改革的决定性因素?
近年来,法国效仿其他欧洲国家,于2016年和2017年实施了两项重大的解雇法规改革。本文旨在从微观经济角度评估这些改革对法国企业招聘和解雇决策的影响。让解雇变得更容易是否会增加解雇和刺激招聘?我们还想知道,相对于其他两个因素,这一制度因素在企业决策中的作用是什么:企业在使用法律和管理劳动力时所采用的策略;以及总体效应或商业环境。为此,我们建立了一个原创数据库,对 2016 年至 2019 年期间的企业进行面板跟踪。考虑到不同规模的企业在用工管理实践方面存在很大的异质性,我们将该数据库划分为 4 个基数--从非常非常小的企业(员工人数少于 5 人)到大型企业(员工人数在 50 人或以上)。根据对几个固定效应模型的估计,我们发现改革可能对就业决策起到了一定作用,但仅限于招聘方面,尤其是对小企业(员工人数少于 10 人)而言。然而,对于这些小企业而言,在人力资源管理逻辑中,员工离职也是招聘决策的驱动因素,甚至更多。然而,大型企业受到的影响较小。最后,反映宏观经济商业环境的总体效应在很大程度上解释了这一时期的招聘和解雇趋势,但大型企业除外,因为在这些企业中,个别做法的变化可能会对这些趋势产生暂时的影响,而不会改变总体趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Law and Economics provides readers with high-quality theoretical and empirical research in which both the legal and economic dimensions merge and combine. The journal welcomes articles that promote a better understanding of legal phenomena, legal decisions made by judges, courts or regulatory agencies, and involving economic tools. Theoretical papers are welcome, provided they have a strong basis in law and economics. We also welcome case studies, as well as empirical analyses – including empirical legal studies – and experimental investigations. The European Journal of Law and Economics does not favor any particular topic, but does have a focus on new and emerging problems. European themes are particularly welcome, because we feel it is important to exploit Europe’s considerable institutional diversity in order to build a more robust body of theory and empirical evidence. However, the purpose of the journal is also to showcase the diversity of law and economics approaches, as supplied by an international mix of authors. Drawing on the support of respected scholars from around the world, who serve as consulting editors and editorial board members, the Editors wish to give contributing authors the opportunity to improve their papers, while also offering them a quick and efficient review process. Officially cited as: Eur J Law Econ
期刊最新文献
Cartels, board gender composition and gender quotas Minimum wage non-compliance: the role of co-determination Efficiency analysis of penitentiary centers in Spain using radial and non-radial DEA and its determinants factors 2015–2020 Seller liability versus platform liability: optimal liability rule and law enforcement in the platform economy Punishment menus and their deterrent effects: an exploratory analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1