A global meta-analysis of the effects of land use on the diversity of stream fish and macroinvertebrates

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Aquatic Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s00027-024-01099-2
Mateus Camana, Jean Carlo Gonçalves Ortega, Gabriel Lourenço Brejão, Adriano Sanches Melo, Murilo Sversut Dias, Fernando Gertum Becker
{"title":"A global meta-analysis of the effects of land use on the diversity of stream fish and macroinvertebrates","authors":"Mateus Camana,&nbsp;Jean Carlo Gonçalves Ortega,&nbsp;Gabriel Lourenço Brejão,&nbsp;Adriano Sanches Melo,&nbsp;Murilo Sversut Dias,&nbsp;Fernando Gertum Becker","doi":"10.1007/s00027-024-01099-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Different catchment land uses affect stream communities through direct and indirect effects by changes in water flow, sediment input, channel physical structure, and productivity. Previous studies of land use effects show a wide variation in the size and direction of biodiversity responses with positive, negative, or even no effects of the loss of native vegetation in catchments. This variation can result from physiographic characteristics, such as the original type of native vegetation (grassland or forest), dominant land use (agricultural or urban), history of change in land use and land coverage (LULC), and climate, and/or from the specific design of each study, such as the range of the analyzed LULC gradient. We performed a meta-analysis of 62 studies using stream macroinvertebrates and fish to determine which of these factors influence the biodiversity responses to changes in LULC. Contrary to our expectation, most of the physiographic factors considered relevant in the literature did not influence the response of macroinvertebrates and fish to land use. We did find, however, that studies with greater ranges of changes in LULC show stronger and the most negative diversity responses for macroinvertebrates. This suggests that studies covering a small gradient in LULC may be unable to detect potentially minute negative impacts on macroinvertebrate diversity. Our results highlight that the response of stream fish and macroinvertebrate diversity to changes in the landscape is context dependent. We suggest that the local environment of study sites and other context-dependent factors should be further investigated to better understand environmental contingencies in stream biodiversity responses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55489,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Sciences","volume":"86 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00027-024-01099-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different catchment land uses affect stream communities through direct and indirect effects by changes in water flow, sediment input, channel physical structure, and productivity. Previous studies of land use effects show a wide variation in the size and direction of biodiversity responses with positive, negative, or even no effects of the loss of native vegetation in catchments. This variation can result from physiographic characteristics, such as the original type of native vegetation (grassland or forest), dominant land use (agricultural or urban), history of change in land use and land coverage (LULC), and climate, and/or from the specific design of each study, such as the range of the analyzed LULC gradient. We performed a meta-analysis of 62 studies using stream macroinvertebrates and fish to determine which of these factors influence the biodiversity responses to changes in LULC. Contrary to our expectation, most of the physiographic factors considered relevant in the literature did not influence the response of macroinvertebrates and fish to land use. We did find, however, that studies with greater ranges of changes in LULC show stronger and the most negative diversity responses for macroinvertebrates. This suggests that studies covering a small gradient in LULC may be unable to detect potentially minute negative impacts on macroinvertebrate diversity. Our results highlight that the response of stream fish and macroinvertebrate diversity to changes in the landscape is context dependent. We suggest that the local environment of study sites and other context-dependent factors should be further investigated to better understand environmental contingencies in stream biodiversity responses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土地利用对溪流鱼类和大型无脊椎动物多样性影响的全球荟萃分析
不同的集水区土地利用会通过水流、沉积物输入、河道物理结构和生产力的变化对溪流群落产生直接或间接的影响。以往对土地利用影响的研究表明,生物多样性反应的大小和方向差异很大,集水区原生植被的丧失会产生积极、消极甚至无影响的效应。这种差异可能源于地貌特征,如原生植被的原始类型(草原或森林)、主要土地用途(农业或城市)、土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC)的变化历史以及气候,和/或源于每项研究的具体设计,如分析的 LULC 梯度范围。我们对使用溪流大型无脊椎动物和鱼类进行的 62 项研究进行了荟萃分析,以确定这些因素中哪些因素会影响生物多样性对 LULC 变化的响应。与我们的预期相反,文献中认为相关的大多数地貌因素并没有影响大型无脊椎动物和鱼类对土地利用的反应。不过,我们确实发现,土地利用、土地利用变化范围较大的研究显示,大型无脊椎动物对多样性的反应更强烈,负面影响也最大。这表明,对土地利用、土地利用变化(LULC)小梯度的研究可能无法发现对大型无脊椎动物多样性潜在的微小负面影响。我们的研究结果突出表明,溪流鱼类和大型无脊椎动物的多样性对景观变化的反应与环境有关。我们建议应进一步调查研究地点的当地环境和其他与环境相关的因素,以更好地了解溪流生物多样性反应中的环境突变因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquatic Sciences
Aquatic Sciences 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
60
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aquatic Sciences – Research Across Boundaries publishes original research, overviews, and reviews dealing with aquatic systems (both freshwater and marine systems) and their boundaries, including the impact of human activities on these systems. The coverage ranges from molecular-level mechanistic studies to investigations at the whole ecosystem scale. Aquatic Sciences publishes articles presenting research across disciplinary and environmental boundaries, including studies examining interactions among geological, microbial, biological, chemical, physical, hydrological, and societal processes, as well as studies assessing land-water, air-water, benthic-pelagic, river-ocean, lentic-lotic, and groundwater-surface water interactions.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the distribution and habitat suitability of Austropotamobius pallipes complex in proximity of invasive Procambarus clarkii in the Avigliana Lakes (northwest Italy): an integrated approach to ecosystem health and conservation Dragonflies (Odonata) as bioindicators of the sustainability of agroforestry systems in the Atlantic Forest Correction: Spatial and temporal taxonomic and functional beta diversity of macroinvertebrate assemblages along a tropical dammed river Environmental heterogeneity drives the spatial distribution of macrobenthos in the Yellow River Delta wetland Trophic niche interactions among native and non-native fish species vary spatially in one of the world's largest reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1