Oblique corrections when \(m_W \ne m_Z \cos {\theta _W}\) at tree level

IF 1.9 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pramana Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s12043-024-02771-w
Simonas Draukšas, Vytautas Dūdėnas, Luís Lavoura
{"title":"Oblique corrections when \\(m_W \\ne m_Z \\cos {\\theta _W}\\) at tree level","authors":"Simonas Draukšas,&nbsp;Vytautas Dūdėnas,&nbsp;Luís Lavoura","doi":"10.1007/s12043-024-02771-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The parametrization of the oblique corrections through <i>S</i>, <i>T</i>, and <i>U</i> – later extended by <i>V</i>, <i>W</i> and <i>X</i> – is a convenient way of comparing the predictions for various electroweak observables at the one-loop level between the Standard Model and its extensions. That parametrization assumes that the extensions under consideration have <span>\\({SU(2)\\times U(1)}\\)</span> gauge symmetry <i>and</i> the tree-level relation <span>\\(m_W = m_Z \\cos {\\theta _W}\\)</span> between the Weinberg angle and the gauge-boson masses. In models where that relation does not hold at the Lagrangian level, the parameter <i>T</i> is not ultraviolet-finite, making the parametrization inadequate. We present expressions that parametrize the difference of the various predictions of two models with <span>\\(m_W \\ne m_Z \\cos {\\theta _W}\\)</span> in terms of oblique parameters. The parameter <i>T</i> does not play a role in those expressions. Conveniently, they may be reached from the ones that were derived for models with tree-level <span>\\(m_W = m_Z \\cos {\\theta _W}\\)</span>, by performing a simple substitution for <i>T</i>. We also discuss the difficulties in using oblique parameters when comparing a model with <span>\\(m_W \\ne m_Z \\cos {\\theta _W}\\)</span> to the Standard Model. Finally, we compute the relevant five oblique parameters <i>S</i>, <i>U</i>, <i>V</i>, <i>W</i> and <i>X</i> in the SM extended by both, hypercharge <span>\\(Y=0\\)</span> and <span>\\(Y=1\\)</span>, triplet scalars.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":743,"journal":{"name":"Pramana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pramana","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12043-024-02771-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The parametrization of the oblique corrections through S, T, and U – later extended by V, W and X – is a convenient way of comparing the predictions for various electroweak observables at the one-loop level between the Standard Model and its extensions. That parametrization assumes that the extensions under consideration have \({SU(2)\times U(1)}\) gauge symmetry and the tree-level relation \(m_W = m_Z \cos {\theta _W}\) between the Weinberg angle and the gauge-boson masses. In models where that relation does not hold at the Lagrangian level, the parameter T is not ultraviolet-finite, making the parametrization inadequate. We present expressions that parametrize the difference of the various predictions of two models with \(m_W \ne m_Z \cos {\theta _W}\) in terms of oblique parameters. The parameter T does not play a role in those expressions. Conveniently, they may be reached from the ones that were derived for models with tree-level \(m_W = m_Z \cos {\theta _W}\), by performing a simple substitution for T. We also discuss the difficulties in using oblique parameters when comparing a model with \(m_W \ne m_Z \cos {\theta _W}\) to the Standard Model. Finally, we compute the relevant five oblique parameters S, U, V, W and X in the SM extended by both, hypercharge \(Y=0\) and \(Y=1\), triplet scalars.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当 $$m_W \ne m_Z \cos {\theta _W}$ 在树级时的斜向修正
通过S、T和U--后来扩展为V、W和X--对斜校正进行参数化,是比较标准模型及其扩展在一回路水平上对各种电弱观测指标的预测的一种方便方法。这种参数化假定所考虑的扩展具有({SU(2)\times U(1)}\)规对称性,以及温伯格角和规玻质量之间的树级关系(m_W = m_Z \cos {\theta _W}\)。在该关系在拉格朗日层面不成立的模型中,参数T不是紫外无限的,使得参数化不充分。我们提出了一些表达式,用斜参数来参数化两个模型的\(m_W \ne m_Z \cos {\theta _W}/)的各种预测的差异。参数 T 在这些表达式中不起作用。我们还讨论了在将\(m_W \ne m_Z \cos {\theta _W}\)模型与标准模型进行比较时使用斜参数的困难。最后,我们计算了由超电荷\(Y=0\)和\(Y=1\)、三重标量扩展的SM中相关的五个斜参数S、U、V、W和X。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pramana
Pramana 物理-物理:综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pramana - Journal of Physics is a monthly research journal in English published by the Indian Academy of Sciences in collaboration with Indian National Science Academy and Indian Physics Association. The journal publishes refereed papers covering current research in Physics, both original contributions - research papers, brief reports or rapid communications - and invited reviews. Pramana also publishes special issues devoted to advances in specific areas of Physics and proceedings of select high quality conferences.
期刊最新文献
Stefan blowing impact and chemical response of Rivlin–Reiner fluid through rotating convective disk Impact of gold and silver nanoparticles on the thermally radiating MHD slip blood flow within the stenotic artery using stability analysis and entropy optimisation Study of the bubble motion inside a peristaltic tube Soft drug epidemic in deterministic and stochastic case studies A comprehensive analysis of anisotropic stellar objects with quadratic equation of state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1