Exploring the Educational Landscape of AI: Large Language Models' Approaches to Explaining Conservation of Momentum in Physics

Keisuke Sato
{"title":"Exploring the Educational Landscape of AI: Large Language Models' Approaches to Explaining Conservation of Momentum in Physics","authors":"Keisuke Sato","doi":"arxiv-2407.05308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education offers both\nopportunities and challenges, particularly in fields like physics that demand\nprecise conceptual understanding. This study examines the capabilities of six\nstate-of-the-art LLMs in explaining the law of conservation of momentum, a\nfundamental principle in physics. By analyzing responses to a consistent,\nsimple prompt in Japanese, we assess the models' explanatory approaches, depth\nof understanding, and adaptability to different educational levels.Our\ncomprehensive analysis, encompassing text characteristics, response similarity,\nand keyword usage, unveils significant diversity in explanatory styles across\nmodels. ChatGPT4.0 and Coral provided more comprehensive and technically\ndetailed explanations, while Gemini models tended toward more intuitive\napproaches. Key findings include variations in the treatment of critical\nconcepts such as net force, and differing emphases on mathematical rigor and\nreal-world applications.The results indicate that different AI models may be\nmore suitable for various educational contexts, ranging from introductory to\nadvanced levels. ChatGPT4.0 and Coral demonstrated potential for advanced\ndiscussions, while Gemini models appeared more appropriate for introductory\nexplanations. Importantly, the study underscores the necessity of educator\nguidance in effectively leveraging these AI tools, as models varied in their\nability to convey nuanced aspects of physical principles.This research\nestablishes a foundation for understanding the educational potential of LLMs in\nphysics, providing insights for educators on integrating these tools into their\nteaching practices. It also highlights the need for further investigation into\nAI-assisted learning in STEM fields, paving the way for more sophisticated\napplications of AI in physics education.","PeriodicalId":501565,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.05308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education offers both opportunities and challenges, particularly in fields like physics that demand precise conceptual understanding. This study examines the capabilities of six state-of-the-art LLMs in explaining the law of conservation of momentum, a fundamental principle in physics. By analyzing responses to a consistent, simple prompt in Japanese, we assess the models' explanatory approaches, depth of understanding, and adaptability to different educational levels.Our comprehensive analysis, encompassing text characteristics, response similarity, and keyword usage, unveils significant diversity in explanatory styles across models. ChatGPT4.0 and Coral provided more comprehensive and technically detailed explanations, while Gemini models tended toward more intuitive approaches. Key findings include variations in the treatment of critical concepts such as net force, and differing emphases on mathematical rigor and real-world applications.The results indicate that different AI models may be more suitable for various educational contexts, ranging from introductory to advanced levels. ChatGPT4.0 and Coral demonstrated potential for advanced discussions, while Gemini models appeared more appropriate for introductory explanations. Importantly, the study underscores the necessity of educator guidance in effectively leveraging these AI tools, as models varied in their ability to convey nuanced aspects of physical principles.This research establishes a foundation for understanding the educational potential of LLMs in physics, providing insights for educators on integrating these tools into their teaching practices. It also highlights the need for further investigation into AI-assisted learning in STEM fields, paving the way for more sophisticated applications of AI in physics education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索人工智能的教育前景:大语言模型解释物理学中动量守恒的方法
将大型语言模型(LLM)融入教育既是机遇也是挑战,尤其是在物理学等要求精确概念理解的领域。本研究考察了六种最先进的大型语言模型在解释物理学基本原理动量守恒定律方面的能力。我们的综合分析包括文本特征、回复相似性和关键词使用,揭示了不同模型在解释风格上的显著差异。ChatGPT4.0 和 Coral 提供了更全面和技术上更详细的解释,而 Gemini 模型则倾向于更直观的方法。研究结果表明,不同的人工智能模型可能更适合从入门级到高级的各种教育环境。ChatGPT4.0 和 Coral 展示了高级讨论的潜力,而 Gemini 模型似乎更适合入门讲解。重要的是,这项研究强调了教育者指导有效利用这些人工智能工具的必要性,因为模型在传达物理原理细微方面的能力各不相同。这项研究为了解物理学 LLM 的教育潜力奠定了基础,为教育者将这些工具融入教学实践提供了启示。这项研究为了解物理学中 LLM 的教育潜力奠定了基础,为教育工作者将这些工具整合到教学实践中提供了启示,同时也强调了在 STEM 领域进一步研究人工智能辅助学习的必要性,为人工智能在物理教育中的更复杂应用铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing New Technology in Educational Systems Reflecting to learn in a physics multimedia communication course The Law of Closest Approach Investigating the Design--Science Connection in a multi-week Engineering Design (ED)-based introductory physics laboratory task A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Empathy in Physics Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1