{"title":"Maximum odd induced subgraph of a graph concerning its chromatic number","authors":"Tao Wang, Baoyindureng Wu","doi":"10.1002/jgt.23148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Let <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>f</mi>\n \n <mi>o</mi>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${f}_{o}(G)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> be the maximum order of an odd induced subgraph of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $G$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. In 1992, Scott proposed a conjecture that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>f</mi>\n \n <mi>o</mi>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>χ</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mfrac>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${f}_{o}(G)\\ge \\frac{n}{\\chi (G)}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for a graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $G$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> of order <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $n$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> without isolated vertices, where <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>χ</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\chi (G)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is the chromatic number of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $G$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. In this paper, we show that the conjecture is not true for bipartite graphs, but is true for all line graphs. In addition, we also disprove a conjecture of Berman, Wang, and Wargo in 1997, which states that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>f</mi>\n \n <mi>o</mi>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mfenced>\n <mfrac>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mn>4</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${f}_{o}(G)\\ge 2\\unicode{x0230A}\\frac{n}{4}\\unicode{x0230B}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for a connected graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $G$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> of order <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $n$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Scott's conjecture is open for graphs with chromatic number at least 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgt.23148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Let be the maximum order of an odd induced subgraph of . In 1992, Scott proposed a conjecture that for a graph of order without isolated vertices, where is the chromatic number of . In this paper, we show that the conjecture is not true for bipartite graphs, but is true for all line graphs. In addition, we also disprove a conjecture of Berman, Wang, and Wargo in 1997, which states that for a connected graph of order . Scott's conjecture is open for graphs with chromatic number at least 3.