Tangible, intangible assets and labour productivity growth

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1108/jes-11-2023-0620
Chiara Castelli, Nicola Comincioli, Chiara Ferrante, Nicola Pontarollo
{"title":"Tangible, intangible assets and labour productivity growth","authors":"Chiara Castelli, Nicola Comincioli, Chiara Ferrante, Nicola Pontarollo","doi":"10.1108/jes-11-2023-0620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The aim of this study is to investigate the contribution of tangible and intangible investments in driving labour productivity growth in the European Union over the period 2000–2017 and their role in the short and medium run. Additionally, heterogeneity across countries is accounted for by performing estimates separately for Eastern and Western European countries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The methodology used to conduct the analysis of the determinants of productivity is the two-way fixed-effect and the system generalised method of moments. We also include country-specific dummies in place of our variable on national innovative capacity as a means to further reduce the number of instruments.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results reveal a long-term relationship of investment in intangible assets with labour productivity growth, more specifically of investment in R&amp;D. This relationship holds both when considering the whole set of European countries and for Western European countries, demonstrating that R&amp;D is key to enhancing labour productivity growth. On the contrary, the effect for Eastern countries is negative, probably due to the lack of capacity to turn this investment into an efficient and effective way to foster productivity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Besides confirming the well-known role of tangible and intangible assets in productivity, the heterogeneity shown in our analysis highlights the need for improving capabilities in Eastern countries. Diversifying the decisions on the investments in European countries, depending on the specific needs and their heterogeneity, could help bridge the productivity gap and enhance specific capabilities of the country systems.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47604,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-11-2023-0620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate the contribution of tangible and intangible investments in driving labour productivity growth in the European Union over the period 2000–2017 and their role in the short and medium run. Additionally, heterogeneity across countries is accounted for by performing estimates separately for Eastern and Western European countries.

Design/methodology/approach

The methodology used to conduct the analysis of the determinants of productivity is the two-way fixed-effect and the system generalised method of moments. We also include country-specific dummies in place of our variable on national innovative capacity as a means to further reduce the number of instruments.

Findings

The results reveal a long-term relationship of investment in intangible assets with labour productivity growth, more specifically of investment in R&D. This relationship holds both when considering the whole set of European countries and for Western European countries, demonstrating that R&D is key to enhancing labour productivity growth. On the contrary, the effect for Eastern countries is negative, probably due to the lack of capacity to turn this investment into an efficient and effective way to foster productivity.

Originality/value

Besides confirming the well-known role of tangible and intangible assets in productivity, the heterogeneity shown in our analysis highlights the need for improving capabilities in Eastern countries. Diversifying the decisions on the investments in European countries, depending on the specific needs and their heterogeneity, could help bridge the productivity gap and enhance specific capabilities of the country systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有形资产、无形资产和劳动生产率增长
目的本研究旨在探讨 2000-2017 年间有形投资和无形投资对推动欧盟劳动生产率增长的贡献及其在短期和中期内的作用。此外,通过对东欧和西欧国家分别进行估算,还考虑到了各国之间的异质性。 设计/方法/途径 用于分析生产率决定因素的方法是双向固定效应和系统广义矩方法。研究结果表明,无形资产投资与劳动生产率增长,特别是研发投资之间存在长期关系。从整个欧洲国家和西欧国家来看,这种关系都是成立的,这表明研发是提高劳动生产率增长的关键。原创性/价值除了证实众所周知的有形资产和无形资产在生产力中的作用外,我们的分析所显示的异质性突出了提高东方国家能力的必要性。根据具体需求及其异质性,对欧洲国家的投资决策进行多样化,有助于缩小生产力差距,提高国家系统的具体能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Studies publishes high quality research findings and commentary on international developments in economics. The journal maintains a sound balance between economic theory and application at both the micro and the macro levels. Articles on economic issues between individual nations, emerging and evolving trading blocs are particularly welcomed. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work for economists in government and industry
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID on the rate of return to schooling among US industries Analyzing the ICT and economic growth relation in OECD countries Students’ performance and faculty efficiency. Assessing the role of gender through a metafrontier An empirical analysis of climate transition: a global outlook of agriculture productivity Is monopoly truly effective for producers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1