Experimental determination of heat generation rates of lithium-ion batteries by thermal protection method

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Science China Technological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s11431-023-2539-x
JingHe Shi, HengYun Zhang, Hong Yu, XiaoLin Wang
{"title":"Experimental determination of heat generation rates of lithium-ion batteries by thermal protection method","authors":"JingHe Shi, HengYun Zhang, Hong Yu, XiaoLin Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11431-023-2539-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Experimental determination of heat generation rates is crucial in the thermal safety design of automotive batteries. A thermal protection method (TPM) is proposed to determine the heat generation rates of 18650 cylindrical lithium-ion batteries under different discharge rates. The physical model based on the thermal protection method is established, and its feasibility is demonstrated through theoretical analysis. In the experimental setup, by introducing lateral thermal protection batteries (TPB) to minimize the heat loss of the center test battery (CTB), heat generation rates of the battery can be obtained based on the temperature change of the CTB. The average heat generation rates of the battery at 1, 2, and 3 C discharge rates are found to be 0.255, 0.844, and 1.811 W, respectively, which can be quadratically correlated with the discharge rate. In addition, a benchmark test of the present measurement against the commonly used accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC) was conducted. Relatively small deviations of 3.77%, 4.20%, and 1.09% were identified in the heat generation rates for the discharge rates at 1, 2, and 3 C. In comparison with the ARC equipment, the present TPM can be more representative of the transient battery heat generation characteristics with a much shorter time for thermal equalization. Finally, to further verify the accuracy of the present method, standard samples of the same size as the actual battery were made, which were capable of controlling heat generation through a direct current power supply. A comparison of the heat inputs of the standard sample with the heat generation rates measured by the thermal protection method shows a relative deviation of 1.01% maximum. With high measurement accuracy and an easy-to-build experimental setup, the proposed method has promising prospects in automotive applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21612,"journal":{"name":"Science China Technological Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science China Technological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2539-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experimental determination of heat generation rates is crucial in the thermal safety design of automotive batteries. A thermal protection method (TPM) is proposed to determine the heat generation rates of 18650 cylindrical lithium-ion batteries under different discharge rates. The physical model based on the thermal protection method is established, and its feasibility is demonstrated through theoretical analysis. In the experimental setup, by introducing lateral thermal protection batteries (TPB) to minimize the heat loss of the center test battery (CTB), heat generation rates of the battery can be obtained based on the temperature change of the CTB. The average heat generation rates of the battery at 1, 2, and 3 C discharge rates are found to be 0.255, 0.844, and 1.811 W, respectively, which can be quadratically correlated with the discharge rate. In addition, a benchmark test of the present measurement against the commonly used accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC) was conducted. Relatively small deviations of 3.77%, 4.20%, and 1.09% were identified in the heat generation rates for the discharge rates at 1, 2, and 3 C. In comparison with the ARC equipment, the present TPM can be more representative of the transient battery heat generation characteristics with a much shorter time for thermal equalization. Finally, to further verify the accuracy of the present method, standard samples of the same size as the actual battery were made, which were capable of controlling heat generation through a direct current power supply. A comparison of the heat inputs of the standard sample with the heat generation rates measured by the thermal protection method shows a relative deviation of 1.01% maximum. With high measurement accuracy and an easy-to-build experimental setup, the proposed method has promising prospects in automotive applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过热保护法实验测定锂离子电池的发热率
热生成率的实验测定对于汽车电池的热安全设计至关重要。本文提出了一种热保护方法 (TPM),用于确定 18650 圆柱形锂离子电池在不同放电速率下的发热率。建立了基于热保护方法的物理模型,并通过理论分析论证了其可行性。在实验装置中,通过引入横向热保护电池(TPB)来减少中心测试电池(CTB)的热损耗,可以根据 CTB 的温度变化获得电池的发热率。结果发现,电池在 1、2 和 3 C 放电率下的平均发热率分别为 0.255、0.844 和 1.811 W,与放电率呈二次相关。此外,本测量方法还与常用的加速速率量热仪(ARC)进行了基准测试。与 ARC 设备相比,本 TPM 更能代表瞬态电池发热特性,且热平衡时间更短。最后,为了进一步验证本方法的准确性,我们制作了与实际电池尺寸相同的标准样品,这些样品能够通过直流电源控制发热。将标准样品的热输入与热保护方法测得的发热率进行比较,结果显示相对偏差最大为 1.01%。该方法测量精度高,实验装置易于搭建,在汽车应用中前景广阔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science China Technological Sciences
Science China Technological Sciences ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
4380
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Science China Technological Sciences, an academic journal cosponsored by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and published by Science China Press, is committed to publishing high-quality, original results in both basic and applied research. Science China Technological Sciences is published in both print and electronic forms. It is indexed by Science Citation Index. Categories of articles: Reviews summarize representative results and achievements in a particular topic or an area, comment on the current state of research, and advise on the research directions. The author’s own opinion and related discussion is requested. Research papers report on important original results in all areas of technological sciences. Brief reports present short reports in a timely manner of the latest important results.
期刊最新文献
A novel method for extracting and optimizing the complex permittivity of paper-based composites based on an artificial neural network model A systematic framework of constructing surrogate model for slider track peeling strength prediction Bridging the Fabry–Perot cavity and asymmetric Berreman mode for long-wave infrared nonreciprocal thermal emitters Unveiling the protective role of biofilm formation on the photoaging of microplastics Adhesive hydrogel interface for enhanced epidermal signal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1