Peter Bowman Mack, Casey Cole, Mintaek Lee, Lisa Peterson, Matthew Lundy, Karen Elizabeth Hegarty, William Espinoza
{"title":"The Impact of a Primary Aldosteronism Predictive Model in Secondary Hypertension Decision Support","authors":"Peter Bowman Mack, Casey Cole, Mintaek Lee, Lisa Peterson, Matthew Lundy, Karen Elizabeth Hegarty, William Espinoza","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine whether the addition of a primary aldosteronism (PA) predictive model to a secondary hypertension decision support\ntool increases screening for PA in a primary care setting.\nMaterials and Methods: 153 primary care clinics were randomized to receive a secondary hypertension decision support tool with or without\nan integrated predictive model between August 2023 and April 2024.\nResults: For patients with risk scores in the top 1 percentile, 63/2,896 (2.2%) patients where the alert was displayed in model clinics had the\norder set launched while 12/1,210 (1.0%) in no model clinics had the order set launched (P = 0.014). 19/2,896 (0.66%) of these highest risk\npatients in model clinics had an ARR ordered compared to 0/1,210 (0.0%) patients in no model clinics (P = 0.010). For patients with scores\nnot in the top 1 percentile, 438/20,493 (2.1%) patients in model clinics had the order set launched compared to 273/17,820 (1.5%) in no model\nclinics (P < 0.001). 124/20,493 (0.61%) in model clinics had an ARR ordered compared to 34/17,820 (0.19%) in the no model clinics (P <\n0.001).\nDiscussion: The addition of a PA predictive model to secondary hypertension alert displays and triggering criteria along with order set displays\nand order preselection criteria results in a statistically and clinically significant increase in screening for PA, a condition that clinicians\ninsufficiently screen for currently.\nConclusion: Addition of a predictive model for an under-screened condition to traditional clinical decision support may increase screening for\nthese conditions.","PeriodicalId":501454,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the addition of a primary aldosteronism (PA) predictive model to a secondary hypertension decision support
tool increases screening for PA in a primary care setting.
Materials and Methods: 153 primary care clinics were randomized to receive a secondary hypertension decision support tool with or without
an integrated predictive model between August 2023 and April 2024.
Results: For patients with risk scores in the top 1 percentile, 63/2,896 (2.2%) patients where the alert was displayed in model clinics had the
order set launched while 12/1,210 (1.0%) in no model clinics had the order set launched (P = 0.014). 19/2,896 (0.66%) of these highest risk
patients in model clinics had an ARR ordered compared to 0/1,210 (0.0%) patients in no model clinics (P = 0.010). For patients with scores
not in the top 1 percentile, 438/20,493 (2.1%) patients in model clinics had the order set launched compared to 273/17,820 (1.5%) in no model
clinics (P < 0.001). 124/20,493 (0.61%) in model clinics had an ARR ordered compared to 34/17,820 (0.19%) in the no model clinics (P <
0.001).
Discussion: The addition of a PA predictive model to secondary hypertension alert displays and triggering criteria along with order set displays
and order preselection criteria results in a statistically and clinically significant increase in screening for PA, a condition that clinicians
insufficiently screen for currently.
Conclusion: Addition of a predictive model for an under-screened condition to traditional clinical decision support may increase screening for
these conditions.