Accurate Collisional Cross Section Measurement by Multipass Cyclic Ion Mobility Spectrometry.

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-07-23 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01758
Chaoshuang Xia, Elias Mernie, Joseph Zaia, Catherine E Costello, Cheng Lin
{"title":"Accurate Collisional Cross Section Measurement by Multipass Cyclic Ion Mobility Spectrometry.","authors":"Chaoshuang Xia, Elias Mernie, Joseph Zaia, Catherine E Costello, Cheng Lin","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) is a powerful analytical tool for structural characterization. IM measurement provides collision cross section (CCS) values that facilitate analyte identification. While CCS values can be directly calculated from mobility measurements obtained using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry (DT-IMS), this method has limited mobility resolution due to the practical constraints on the length of the ion drift path. Consequently, DT-IMS cannot differentiate analytes with similar mobilities or resolve fine mobility features of individual ions. Cyclic IMS (cIMS) instruments leverage a cyclic path enabled by traveling wave ion mobility (TWIM) technology and offer increased mobility solution to address this challenge. While TWIM devices must first be calibrated to enable CCS measurements, current calibration strategies are primarily tailored for single-pass analyses. This preference is partly attributed to the challenges associated with multipass calibration methods, which require both calibrants and analytes to experience the same number of passes. Achieving this consistency can be complicated due to factors like peak splitting and diffusion, and may not be feasible for online IM-MS analyses. A recent report employed average ion velocities obtained from multiple measurements under different separation pathlengths as a path length-independent metric for CCS calibration. However, the ability to exploit this averaging approach is limited by observed variation in ion drift time/velocity in these measurements. In this study, we introduce a novel calibration strategy designed for multipass cIMS analyses, directly targeting the root cause for the path length- and mobility-dependent variations in ion drift time. With this method, we demonstrate that CCS values derived from multipass measurements closely align with those obtained from single-pass analyses, with an average deviation of 0.1%. We apply this method to characterize four isomeric trisaccharides. Our approach not only results in excellent agreement between our measured <sup>cIMS</sup>CCS values and the reported <sup>DT</sup>CCS values, with an average difference of only 0.5%, but also allows us to effectively identify subtle mobility characteristics of each compound and determine their respective CCS values. This level of detail and accuracy was previously unattainable using DT-IMS or single-pass cIMS measurements. We developed an algorithm for reconstructing arrival time distribution in cases where wrap-around has resulted in peak splitting. Collectively, the new calibration strategy and the reconstruction procedure maintain reproducibility and precision in CCS measurements while largely eliminating the need for meticulous selection of separation times. We expect that our method will empower researchers to harness the high mobility resolution offered by multipass cIMS analyses without compromising the accuracy of CCS measurement, making it appropriate for straightforward use across a wide range of applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01758","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) is a powerful analytical tool for structural characterization. IM measurement provides collision cross section (CCS) values that facilitate analyte identification. While CCS values can be directly calculated from mobility measurements obtained using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry (DT-IMS), this method has limited mobility resolution due to the practical constraints on the length of the ion drift path. Consequently, DT-IMS cannot differentiate analytes with similar mobilities or resolve fine mobility features of individual ions. Cyclic IMS (cIMS) instruments leverage a cyclic path enabled by traveling wave ion mobility (TWIM) technology and offer increased mobility solution to address this challenge. While TWIM devices must first be calibrated to enable CCS measurements, current calibration strategies are primarily tailored for single-pass analyses. This preference is partly attributed to the challenges associated with multipass calibration methods, which require both calibrants and analytes to experience the same number of passes. Achieving this consistency can be complicated due to factors like peak splitting and diffusion, and may not be feasible for online IM-MS analyses. A recent report employed average ion velocities obtained from multiple measurements under different separation pathlengths as a path length-independent metric for CCS calibration. However, the ability to exploit this averaging approach is limited by observed variation in ion drift time/velocity in these measurements. In this study, we introduce a novel calibration strategy designed for multipass cIMS analyses, directly targeting the root cause for the path length- and mobility-dependent variations in ion drift time. With this method, we demonstrate that CCS values derived from multipass measurements closely align with those obtained from single-pass analyses, with an average deviation of 0.1%. We apply this method to characterize four isomeric trisaccharides. Our approach not only results in excellent agreement between our measured cIMSCCS values and the reported DTCCS values, with an average difference of only 0.5%, but also allows us to effectively identify subtle mobility characteristics of each compound and determine their respective CCS values. This level of detail and accuracy was previously unattainable using DT-IMS or single-pass cIMS measurements. We developed an algorithm for reconstructing arrival time distribution in cases where wrap-around has resulted in peak splitting. Collectively, the new calibration strategy and the reconstruction procedure maintain reproducibility and precision in CCS measurements while largely eliminating the need for meticulous selection of separation times. We expect that our method will empower researchers to harness the high mobility resolution offered by multipass cIMS analyses without compromising the accuracy of CCS measurement, making it appropriate for straightforward use across a wide range of applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多通道循环离子迁移率谱仪精确测量碰撞截面。
离子迁移质谱法(IM-MS)是一种用于结构表征的强大分析工具。IM 测量可提供碰撞截面 (CCS) 值,有助于分析物的鉴定。虽然可以通过使用漂移管离子迁移谱(DT-IMS)获得的迁移率测量值直接计算出 CCS 值,但由于离子漂移路径长度的实际限制,这种方法的迁移率分辨率有限。因此,DT-IMS 无法区分具有相似迁移率的分析物,也无法分辨单个离子的微小迁移率特征。循环 IMS(cIMS)仪器利用行波离子迁移率(TWIM)技术实现的循环路径,提供更高的迁移率解决方案来应对这一挑战。虽然 TWIM 设备必须首先经过校准才能进行 CCS 测量,但目前的校准策略主要是为单通道分析量身定制的。造成这种偏好的部分原因是与多通道校准方法相关的挑战,多通道校准方法要求校准物和被分析物经历相同的通道次数。由于峰分裂和扩散等因素,实现这种一致性可能很复杂,而且在线 IM-MS 分析可能也不可行。最近的一份报告采用了从不同分离路径长度下的多次测量中获得的平均离子速度,作为与路径长度无关的 CCS 校准指标。然而,在这些测量中观察到的离子漂移时间/速度变化限制了利用这种平均方法的能力。在本研究中,我们介绍了一种专为多通道 cIMS 分析设计的新型校准策略,直接针对离子漂移时间随路径长度和迁移率变化的根本原因。通过这种方法,我们证明了多通道测量得出的 CCS 值与单通道分析得出的 CCS 值非常接近,平均偏差为 0.1%。我们采用这种方法表征了四种异构三糖。我们的方法不仅使我们测得的 cIMSCCS 值与报告的 DTCCS 值非常一致,平均偏差仅为 0.5%,而且还能有效识别每种化合物的微妙迁移率特征,并确定它们各自的 CCS 值。这种详细程度和准确性是以前使用 DT-IMS 或单程 cIMS 测量无法达到的。我们开发了一种算法,用于在缠绕导致峰值分裂的情况下重建到达时间分布。总之,新的校准策略和重建程序保持了 CCS 测量的可重复性和精确性,同时在很大程度上消除了对分离时间进行细致选择的需要。我们预计,我们的方法将使研究人员能够利用多通道 cIMS 分析提供的高迁移率分辨率,而不会影响 CCS 测量的准确性,从而使其适用于广泛的应用领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
期刊最新文献
Exonuclease III/Cas12a Cascade Amplification Strategy and Smartphone-Based Portable Fluorescence Detector to Repurpose the Commercial AFP Strip for the POCT of Multiple RNAs. High-Throughput Metabolomics using 96-plex Isotope Tagging. Microchip Liquid-Phase Ion Trap for Online Mass Spectrometry Analysis. Mini-Program Enabled IoT Intelligent Molecular Diagnostic Device for Co-Detection and Spatiotemporal Mapping of Infectious Disease Pathogens. Rock-to-Pharma: Characterization of Shale Oil-Based Nonbiological Complex Drugs along the Production Process by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1