{"title":"Engineering a 3-dimensional tissue construct with adipose-derived stem cells for healing bone defect: An ex vivo study with femur head","authors":"Aditi Mahajan, Siddhartha Sharma, Sanjay Kumar Bhadada, Aditya Aggarwal, Shalmoli Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1002/biot.202300751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The compatibility of bone graft substitutes (BGS) with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is an important parameter to consider for their use in repairing bone defects as it eventually affects the clinical outcome. In the present study, a few commercially available BGS – β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), calcium sulfate, gelatin sponge, and different forms of hydroxyapatite (HAP) were screened for their interactions with MSCs from adipose tissue (ADSCs). It was demonstrated that HAP block favorably supported ADSC viability, morphology, migration, and differentiation compared to other scaffolds. The results strongly suggest the importance of preclinical evaluation of bone scaffolds for their cellular compatibility. Furthermore, the bone regenerative potential of HAP block with ADSCs was evaluated in an ex vivo bone defect model developed using patient derived trabecular bone explants. The explants were cultured for 45 days in vitro and bone formation was assessed by expression of osteogenic genes, ALP secretion, and high resolution computed tomography. Our findings confirmed active bone repair process in ex vivo settings. Addition of ADSCs significantly accelerated the repair process and improved bone microarchitecture. This ex vivo bone defect model can emerge as a viable alternative to animal experimentation and also as a potent tool to evaluate patient specific bone therapeutics under controlled conditions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":134,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Journal","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/biot.202300751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The compatibility of bone graft substitutes (BGS) with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is an important parameter to consider for their use in repairing bone defects as it eventually affects the clinical outcome. In the present study, a few commercially available BGS – β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), calcium sulfate, gelatin sponge, and different forms of hydroxyapatite (HAP) were screened for their interactions with MSCs from adipose tissue (ADSCs). It was demonstrated that HAP block favorably supported ADSC viability, morphology, migration, and differentiation compared to other scaffolds. The results strongly suggest the importance of preclinical evaluation of bone scaffolds for their cellular compatibility. Furthermore, the bone regenerative potential of HAP block with ADSCs was evaluated in an ex vivo bone defect model developed using patient derived trabecular bone explants. The explants were cultured for 45 days in vitro and bone formation was assessed by expression of osteogenic genes, ALP secretion, and high resolution computed tomography. Our findings confirmed active bone repair process in ex vivo settings. Addition of ADSCs significantly accelerated the repair process and improved bone microarchitecture. This ex vivo bone defect model can emerge as a viable alternative to animal experimentation and also as a potent tool to evaluate patient specific bone therapeutics under controlled conditions.
Biotechnology JournalBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology Journal (2019 Journal Citation Reports: 3.543) is fully comprehensive in its scope and publishes strictly peer-reviewed papers covering novel aspects and methods in all areas of biotechnology. Some issues are devoted to a special topic, providing the latest information on the most crucial areas of research and technological advances.
In addition to these special issues, the journal welcomes unsolicited submissions for primary research articles, such as Research Articles, Rapid Communications and Biotech Methods. BTJ also welcomes proposals of Review Articles - please send in a brief outline of the article and the senior author''s CV to the editorial office.
BTJ promotes a special emphasis on:
Systems Biotechnology
Synthetic Biology and Metabolic Engineering
Nanobiotechnology and Biomaterials
Tissue engineering, Regenerative Medicine and Stem cells
Gene Editing, Gene therapy and Immunotherapy
Omics technologies
Industrial Biotechnology, Biopharmaceuticals and Biocatalysis
Bioprocess engineering and Downstream processing
Plant Biotechnology
Biosafety, Biotech Ethics, Science Communication
Methods and Advances.