A DPC Database Study on the Safety of Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab/Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Japanese Patients

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-02921-x
Akito Hata, Shunichiro Iwasawa, Yusuke Sasaki, Kosei Tajima, Yasutaka Chiba
{"title":"A DPC Database Study on the Safety of Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab/Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Japanese Patients","authors":"Akito Hata,&nbsp;Shunichiro Iwasawa,&nbsp;Yusuke Sasaki,&nbsp;Kosei Tajima,&nbsp;Yasutaka Chiba","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-02921-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) combination therapy is a standard of care for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ-NSCLC); however, the lack of safety data limits its clinical application in Japan.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study compared the safety of ABCP with that of bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BCP) combination for the treatment of advanced NSQ-NSCLC in Japanese patients by evaluating the clinical background and incidence of adverse events (AEs) based on data extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) for up to 1 year were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A search conducted using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes identified 350,987 patients, of whom 202 were included in the ABCP cohort and 232 in the BCP cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and febrile neutropenia (FN) was significantly higher in the ABCP cohort versus the BCP cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43–4.91] for skin disorder and 1.70 (95% CI 1.01–2.85) for FN. The adjusted RMST differences were − 64.2 days (95% CI − 93.0 to − 35.4 days) and − 46.0 days (95% CI − 73.5 to − 18.5 days) for skin disorder and FN, respectively. These results were comparable to those of other pivotal clinical trials.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings of this DPC database study highlight the safety of ABCP in Japanese clinical practice, and this methodology may facilitate more efficient research in real-world settings.</p><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID UMIN000041507.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02921-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) combination therapy is a standard of care for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ-NSCLC); however, the lack of safety data limits its clinical application in Japan.

Methods

This study compared the safety of ABCP with that of bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BCP) combination for the treatment of advanced NSQ-NSCLC in Japanese patients by evaluating the clinical background and incidence of adverse events (AEs) based on data extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) for up to 1 year were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method.

Results

A search conducted using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes identified 350,987 patients, of whom 202 were included in the ABCP cohort and 232 in the BCP cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and febrile neutropenia (FN) was significantly higher in the ABCP cohort versus the BCP cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43–4.91] for skin disorder and 1.70 (95% CI 1.01–2.85) for FN. The adjusted RMST differences were − 64.2 days (95% CI − 93.0 to − 35.4 days) and − 46.0 days (95% CI − 73.5 to − 18.5 days) for skin disorder and FN, respectively. These results were comparable to those of other pivotal clinical trials.

Conclusions

The findings of this DPC database study highlight the safety of ABCP in Japanese clinical practice, and this methodology may facilitate more efficient research in real-world settings.

Trial Registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID UMIN000041507.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于日本非小细胞肺癌患者使用阿特珠单抗/贝伐单抗/卡铂/紫杉醇安全性的 DPC 数据库研究。
简介阿特珠单抗、贝伐单抗、卡铂和紫杉醇(ABCP)联合疗法是治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSQ-NSCLC)的标准疗法;然而,安全性数据的缺乏限制了其在日本的临床应用:本研究比较了 ABCP 与贝伐单抗、卡铂和紫杉醇(BCP)联合疗法在日本患者中治疗晚期 NSQ-NSCLC 的安全性,根据从诊断程序组合(DPC)数据库中提取的数据评估了不良事件(AEs)的临床背景和发生率。分析了19种临床重要不良反应的发生率和长达1年的限制性平均生存时间(RMST)。使用反概率加权法对协变量进行了调整:使用《疾病和有关健康问题的国际统计分类》第 10 次修订版代码进行的检索确定了 350,987 名患者,其中 202 人被纳入 ABCP 队列,232 人被纳入 BCP 队列。在19种AE中,ABCP队列中皮肤病和发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的发病率明显高于BCP队列。皮肤病的调整后发病率比为 2.65 [95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.43-4.91],发热性中性粒细胞减少症的调整后发病率比为 1.70 (95% CI 1.01-2.85)。皮肤病和 FN 的调整后 RMST 差异分别为-64.2 天(95% CI - 93.0 至 - 35.4 天)和-46.0 天(95% CI - 73.5 至 - 18.5 天)。这些结果与其他关键临床试验的结果相当:这项 DPC 数据库研究的结果凸显了 ABCP 在日本临床实践中的安全性,这种方法可能有助于在真实世界环境中开展更有效的研究:试验注册:UMIN 临床试验注册编号 UMIN000041507。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Claims Analysis of the Rate of Complications in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Patients Diagnosed with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Real-World Study in the USA, Europe and Japan. Dosing Patterns of Dulaglutide and Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France and Italy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmaceutical-Grade Chondroitin Sulfate for Knee Osteoarthritis Based on Individual Patient Data from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Sacral and Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation for the Management of Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1