Gary Peiser, Rajat Chand, Joao G Amaral, Manuel Carcao, Laura Willis, Aisling Carrol Downey, Alessandro Gasparetto
{"title":"Complications of pediatric macrocystic lymphatic malformations of the head and neck: a survival analysis of treated and untreated patients.","authors":"Gary Peiser, Rajat Chand, Joao G Amaral, Manuel Carcao, Laura Willis, Aisling Carrol Downey, Alessandro Gasparetto","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02266-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare events of recurrent swelling between treated and untreated patients with macrocystic lymphatic malformations of the head and neck not involving the airway. The frequency and timing of emergency department (ED) visits related to the event were analysed to provide data on efficacy and ideal timing of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-year retrospective review of a hospital database was conducted reviewing 35 patients (15 female, 20 male; mean age 3.9 years) with macrocystic lymphatic malformations of the head and neck not involving the airway. Patients treated with oral medications were excluded. A survival analysis was performed comparing the incidence of recurrent swelling of the malformation. A Cox regression analysis was conducted using age, gender, diameter of lymphatic malformation at presentation, and echogenicity on US as covariates. Fisher's test and mean comparisons were performed to correlate the populations baselines and the number and frequency of ED visits between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients underwent sclerotherapy soon after initial presentation and 22 elected for observation. The two baseline populations differed at presentation with the treatment group being younger (1.4 ± 2.4 vs. 5.4 ± 6.3 years, p = 0.03) and with larger lesions (5.7 ± 2.7 vs. 4.0 ± 1.7 cm p = 0.03). Mean follow-up time was 2.7 years. Survival analysis showed 1 or multiple recurrences affected 16 patients in the untreated group and 3 patients in the treated group. (p = 0.04). Age, gender, diameter of the lesion at presentation and increased echogenicity on US were not predictive factors of recurrence. Although the probability of visiting the ED at least once did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.42), patients from the non-treatment group were more likely to visit the ED more than once (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sclerotherapy treatment may reduce the chance of recurrent swelling or an event after initial presentation to the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"669-675"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-024-02266-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare events of recurrent swelling between treated and untreated patients with macrocystic lymphatic malformations of the head and neck not involving the airway. The frequency and timing of emergency department (ED) visits related to the event were analysed to provide data on efficacy and ideal timing of treatment.
Methods: A 5-year retrospective review of a hospital database was conducted reviewing 35 patients (15 female, 20 male; mean age 3.9 years) with macrocystic lymphatic malformations of the head and neck not involving the airway. Patients treated with oral medications were excluded. A survival analysis was performed comparing the incidence of recurrent swelling of the malformation. A Cox regression analysis was conducted using age, gender, diameter of lymphatic malformation at presentation, and echogenicity on US as covariates. Fisher's test and mean comparisons were performed to correlate the populations baselines and the number and frequency of ED visits between the 2 groups.
Results: Thirteen patients underwent sclerotherapy soon after initial presentation and 22 elected for observation. The two baseline populations differed at presentation with the treatment group being younger (1.4 ± 2.4 vs. 5.4 ± 6.3 years, p = 0.03) and with larger lesions (5.7 ± 2.7 vs. 4.0 ± 1.7 cm p = 0.03). Mean follow-up time was 2.7 years. Survival analysis showed 1 or multiple recurrences affected 16 patients in the untreated group and 3 patients in the treated group. (p = 0.04). Age, gender, diameter of the lesion at presentation and increased echogenicity on US were not predictive factors of recurrence. Although the probability of visiting the ED at least once did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.42), patients from the non-treatment group were more likely to visit the ED more than once (p = 0.03).
Conclusions: Sclerotherapy treatment may reduce the chance of recurrent swelling or an event after initial presentation to the ED.
期刊介绍：
To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
