Two-to-One Randomization: Rarely Advisable.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1200/OP.24.00217
Boris Freidlin, Edward L Korn
{"title":"Two-to-One Randomization: Rarely Advisable.","authors":"Boris Freidlin, Edward L Korn","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a randomized clinical trial, instead of allocating patients equally between the treatment arms, some trials in oncology assign a higher proportion of patients to receive the experimental treatment arm (eg, a two-to-one randomization). In this commentary, we first briefly review the common reasons given for the use of a two-to-one randomization and provide some examples of trials using these designs. We then explain why the risk-benefit ratio of this approach may not be favorable as is commonly assumed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"1555-1558"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a randomized clinical trial, instead of allocating patients equally between the treatment arms, some trials in oncology assign a higher proportion of patients to receive the experimental treatment arm (eg, a two-to-one randomization). In this commentary, we first briefly review the common reasons given for the use of a two-to-one randomization and provide some examples of trials using these designs. We then explain why the risk-benefit ratio of this approach may not be favorable as is commonly assumed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二对一随机化:很少采用。
在随机临床试验中,有些肿瘤学试验不是将患者平均分配到不同的治疗组,而是将较高比例的患者分配到实验治疗组(例如,二对一随机化)。在本评论中,我们首先简要回顾了采用二对一随机化的常见原因,并提供了一些采用这种设计的试验实例。然后,我们将解释为什么这种方法的风险收益比可能并不像人们通常认为的那样有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness of Circulating Tumor DNA-Guided Adjuvant Atezolizumab in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Based on IMvigor011 Trial. Toxicity of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients With Diverting Stoma. Burnout in Oncology Clinical Research Coordinators: Underlying Factors and Role of Empathy as a Moderator. Acute Care Events During Systemic Cancer Treatment: Moving From Risk Prediction to Clinical Decision Support Using a Two-Model Approach. Comparable Effectiveness of Weight-Based and Fixed-Dose Pembrolizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Insights From a National Real-World Cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1