Sarcopenia and survival in colorectal cancer without distant metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1111/jgh.16681
Wen-Li Lin, Thi-Hoang-Yen Nguyen, Wen-Tsung Huang, How-Ran Guo, Li-Min Wu
{"title":"Sarcopenia and survival in colorectal cancer without distant metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Wen-Li Lin, Thi-Hoang-Yen Nguyen, Wen-Tsung Huang, How-Ran Guo, Li-Min Wu","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Despite prior attempts to evaluate the effects of sarcopenia on survival among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the results of these studies have not been consistent. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between sarcopenia and survival among patients having CRC without distant metastasis by aggregating multiple studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a literature search using computerized databases and identified additional studies from among the bibliographies of retrieved articles. The quality of each study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and meta-analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies with up to 6600 participants were included in the meta-analyses, with a mean age of 63.6 years (range: 18-93 years). We found that preoperative sarcopenia was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-1.88) and worse DFS (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.10-2.24). Compared with patients without sarcopenia after tumor resection, those with postoperative sarcopenia had worse OS (HR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.47-2.10) and DFS (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.46-2.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These meta-analyses suggest that sarcopenia, no matter observed before or after tumor resection, is associated with worse OS and DFS in patients with CRC who have no distant metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16681","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Despite prior attempts to evaluate the effects of sarcopenia on survival among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the results of these studies have not been consistent. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between sarcopenia and survival among patients having CRC without distant metastasis by aggregating multiple studies.

Methods: We performed a literature search using computerized databases and identified additional studies from among the bibliographies of retrieved articles. The quality of each study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and meta-analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results: Thirteen studies with up to 6600 participants were included in the meta-analyses, with a mean age of 63.6 years (range: 18-93 years). We found that preoperative sarcopenia was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-1.88) and worse DFS (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.10-2.24). Compared with patients without sarcopenia after tumor resection, those with postoperative sarcopenia had worse OS (HR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.47-2.10) and DFS (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.46-2.20).

Conclusion: These meta-analyses suggest that sarcopenia, no matter observed before or after tumor resection, is associated with worse OS and DFS in patients with CRC who have no distant metastasis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无远处转移的大肠癌患者的 "肌肉疏松症 "与生存率:系统综述与荟萃分析。
背景与目的:尽管之前曾尝试评估肌肉疏松症对结直肠癌(CRC)患者生存期的影响,但这些研究的结果并不一致。本研究旨在通过汇总多项研究,评估肌肉疏松症与无远处转移的 CRC 患者生存率之间的关系:我们使用计算机数据库进行了文献检索,并从检索到的文章书目中找出了其他研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对每项研究的质量进行评估,并对总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)进行荟萃分析:荟萃分析共纳入了 13 项研究,参试者多达 6600 人,平均年龄为 63.6 岁(范围:18-93 岁)。我们发现,术前肌少症与较差的 OS(危险比 [HR]:1.61;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.38-1.88)和较差的 DFS(HR:1.57;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.10-2.24)相关。与肿瘤切除术后无肌少症的患者相比,术后肌少症患者的 OS(HR:1.76;95% CI:1.47-2.10)和 DFS(HR:1.79;95% CI:1.46-2.20)更差:这些荟萃分析表明,在没有远处转移的 CRC 患者中,无论肿瘤切除前还是切除后观察到的肌肉疏松症都与较差的 OS 和 DFS 相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating vonoprazan bismuth‐containing triple therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle biopsy using macroscopic on‐site evaluation technique reduces the number passes yet maintains a high diagnostic accuracy: A randomized study Bioinformatics and experimental validation were combined to explore lactylation‐related biomarkers in HBV‐associated acute liver failure Selenium alleviates dextran sulfate sodium‐induced colitis and inhibits ferroptosis of intestinal epithelial cells via upregulating glutathione peroxidase 4 Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: Unique features and low lethality compared with small bowel adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1