Mikael Christiansen, Anders Abildgaard, Julie Brogaard Larsen, Gitte Tindbæk, Else Marie Vestergaard
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of the CellaVision preclassification neutrophil count - time to bypass the reclassification?","authors":"Mikael Christiansen, Anders Abildgaard, Julie Brogaard Larsen, Gitte Tindbæk, Else Marie Vestergaard","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2024.2377967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to perform a method comparison between the CellaVision preclassification neutrophil count and the reclassification neutrophil count performed by trained laboratory technicians, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the preclassification neutrophil count at clinical decision levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patient samples through 2019-2022 in which the differential count was performed on Cellavision (<i>n</i> = 4,354). Data on sample characteristics and leukocyte- and differential counts was extracted from the electronic medical journal. For each sample, data containing the pre- and reclassification leukocyte classification, respectively, was extracted from the Cellavision software. Method comparison between the pre-and reclassification neutrophil count was performed using Bland Altman analysis. Diagnostic performance of the preclassification neutrophil count was evaluated according to four pre-specified categories of results with the reclassification as reference method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median difference between the pre- and reclassification neutrophil count was 0.044 x 10<sup>9</sup>/L. The preclassification neutrophil count categorised 95.6% of all samples correctly according to the four categories. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detecting neutrophilia > 7.00 x 10<sup>9</sup>/L was 98.8%, 97.2%, 95.8%, and 99.2%, respectively. In samples with leukopenia (<i>n</i> = 543), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detecting severe neutropenia (< 0.50 x 10<sup>9</sup>/L) was 97.7%, 99.1%, 98.6%, and 98.5%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnostic performance of the CellaVision preclassification neutrophil count was satisfactory. The preclassification neutrophil count may be released to the electronic medical journal to improve turnaround time and benefit laboratory management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"278-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2024.2377967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to perform a method comparison between the CellaVision preclassification neutrophil count and the reclassification neutrophil count performed by trained laboratory technicians, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the preclassification neutrophil count at clinical decision levels.
Methods: We retrospectively identified patient samples through 2019-2022 in which the differential count was performed on Cellavision (n = 4,354). Data on sample characteristics and leukocyte- and differential counts was extracted from the electronic medical journal. For each sample, data containing the pre- and reclassification leukocyte classification, respectively, was extracted from the Cellavision software. Method comparison between the pre-and reclassification neutrophil count was performed using Bland Altman analysis. Diagnostic performance of the preclassification neutrophil count was evaluated according to four pre-specified categories of results with the reclassification as reference method.
Results: The median difference between the pre- and reclassification neutrophil count was 0.044 x 109/L. The preclassification neutrophil count categorised 95.6% of all samples correctly according to the four categories. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detecting neutrophilia > 7.00 x 109/L was 98.8%, 97.2%, 95.8%, and 99.2%, respectively. In samples with leukopenia (n = 543), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detecting severe neutropenia (< 0.50 x 109/L) was 97.7%, 99.1%, 98.6%, and 98.5%, respectively.
Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of the CellaVision preclassification neutrophil count was satisfactory. The preclassification neutrophil count may be released to the electronic medical journal to improve turnaround time and benefit laboratory management.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry.
The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.