Social Skills Interventions for Adolescents with Level 1 Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240302
Antonio Narzisi, Gianluca Sesso, Maddalena Fabbri-Destro, Stefano Berloffa, Pamela Fantozzi, Rosy Muccio, Gianina Bruzzi, Stefano Scatigna, Elena Valente, Valentina Viglione, Annarita Milone, Samuele Cortese, Gabriele Masi
{"title":"Social Skills Interventions for Adolescents with Level 1 Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Antonio Narzisi, Gianluca Sesso, Maddalena Fabbri-Destro, Stefano Berloffa, Pamela Fantozzi, Rosy Muccio, Gianina Bruzzi, Stefano Scatigna, Elena Valente, Valentina Viglione, Annarita Milone, Samuele Cortese, Gabriele Masi","doi":"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evidence on the efficacy of social skills training for adolescents with Level 1 Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science until July 27th, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of social skills training for pre-adolescents and adolescents (aged 9-18) with Level 1 ASD. We then pooled data on efficacy from individual RCTs by conducting multivariate mixed-effects meta-analyses in R. We estimated possible bias in the retained RCTs using the RoB2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retained 36 RCTs (encompassing 2796 participants), including 18 RCTs comparing an experimental treatment to a waiting list, and 18 RCTs comparing it to standard care/control treatment. Meta-analyses showed that experimental treatments were significantly more efficacious than waiting list or standard care/ control treatments in improving social skills (SMD = 0.3745; 95%CI = [0.2396; 0.5093]), as well as reducing behavioral symptoms (0.3154;0.1783, 0.4525) and anxious/depressive symptoms (0.2780; 0.0432, 0.5128). However, for some outcomes there was significant heterogeneity across studies and evidence of publication bias. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions did not identify any specific clinical or demographic factors as significant predictors of outcome. The most common risk of bias across studies was related to deviations from intended interventions and measurement of the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At the group level, social skills training for adolescents with Level 1 ASD is efficacious, with small-to-moderate effect size. Future research should focus on personalized medicine approaches, aimed at tailoring interventions to specific characteristics of adolescents with Level 1 ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46700,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evidence on the efficacy of social skills training for adolescents with Level 1 Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is unclear.

Method: We searched Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science until July 27th, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of social skills training for pre-adolescents and adolescents (aged 9-18) with Level 1 ASD. We then pooled data on efficacy from individual RCTs by conducting multivariate mixed-effects meta-analyses in R. We estimated possible bias in the retained RCTs using the RoB2 tool.

Results: We retained 36 RCTs (encompassing 2796 participants), including 18 RCTs comparing an experimental treatment to a waiting list, and 18 RCTs comparing it to standard care/control treatment. Meta-analyses showed that experimental treatments were significantly more efficacious than waiting list or standard care/ control treatments in improving social skills (SMD = 0.3745; 95%CI = [0.2396; 0.5093]), as well as reducing behavioral symptoms (0.3154;0.1783, 0.4525) and anxious/depressive symptoms (0.2780; 0.0432, 0.5128). However, for some outcomes there was significant heterogeneity across studies and evidence of publication bias. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions did not identify any specific clinical or demographic factors as significant predictors of outcome. The most common risk of bias across studies was related to deviations from intended interventions and measurement of the outcomes.

Conclusions: At the group level, social skills training for adolescents with Level 1 ASD is efficacious, with small-to-moderate effect size. Future research should focus on personalized medicine approaches, aimed at tailoring interventions to specific characteristics of adolescents with Level 1 ASD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对一级自闭症谱系障碍青少年的社交技能干预:随机对照试验的系统回顾与元分析》。
目的有关社交技能训练对一级自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)青少年的疗效的证据尚不明确:截至 2023 年 7 月 27 日,我们在 Pubmed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上检索了针对 1 级自闭症青少年(9-18 岁)的社交技能培训的随机对照试验 (RCT)。然后,我们通过在 R 中进行多变量混合效应荟萃分析,汇集了单个 RCT 的疗效数据:我们保留了 36 项 RCT(涉及 2796 名参与者),其中 18 项 RCT 比较了试验性治疗与等待名单,18 项 RCT 比较了试验性治疗与标准护理/对照治疗。元分析表明,在提高社交技能(SMD = 0.3745; 95%CI = [0.2396; 0.5093])、减少行为症状(0.3154;0.1783, 0.4525)和焦虑/抑郁症状(0.2780; 0.0432, 0.5128)方面,实验性疗法的疗效明显优于候诊名单或标准护理/对照疗法。然而,对于某些结果,不同研究之间存在显著的异质性,并有证据表明存在发表偏倚。亚组分析和元回归没有发现任何特定的临床或人口学因素对结果有显著的预测作用。各研究中最常见的偏倚风险与预期干预和结果测量的偏差有关:在团体层面上,针对一级自闭症青少年的社交技能训练是有效的,但效果有限。未来的研究应侧重于个性化医疗方法,旨在根据一级自闭症青少年的具体特征调整干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Clinical Neuropsychiatry CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Therapeutic Relationship in Videoconferencing Psychotherapy: A Qualitative Study of Therapists' Experiences. Alexithymia: A Defense of the Original Conceptualization of the Construct and a Critique of the Attention-Appraisal Model. Effects of Approved Pharmacological Interventions for Insomnia on Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review. Psychopathological Correlates and Psychosocial Functioning in Children and Adolescents with Syncope: A Systematic Review. Reevaluating ADHD and its First-Line Treatment: Insights from DSM-5-TR and Modern Approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1