Utility of immunocytochemistry in diagnosing abdominopelvic washings from patients undergoing radical surgery for endometrial cancer.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY Cytojournal Pub Date : 2024-06-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/Cytojournal_10_2024
Zhihua Lan, Jing Zhang, Fang Yang, Xin Ma, Rongfang He
{"title":"Utility of immunocytochemistry in diagnosing abdominopelvic washings from patients undergoing radical surgery for endometrial cancer.","authors":"Zhihua Lan, Jing Zhang, Fang Yang, Xin Ma, Rongfang He","doi":"10.25259/Cytojournal_10_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the efficacy of immunocytochemistry in diagnosing abdominopelvic washings (APWs) and evaluate the superiority of cytology combined with immunocytochemistry over cytology alone.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data on APW cytology and available cell blocks from patients who underwent radical surgery for endometrial cancer between January 2021 and December 2022 were reviewed. Cytology was re-evaluated according to a five-tier system. Immunocytochemistry analysis for targets such as Sry box transcription factor 1(SOX17), Paired box gene 2 (Pax-2) protein, Phosphatase and tensin (PTEN), and β-catenin was performed on each case with non-negative cytology. Mismatch repair (MMR) protein and P53 immunocytochemistry analyses were performed using cell blocks from cases with abnormal MMR or P53 expression in their primary lesion. The accuracies of cytology combined with immunocytochemistry and cytology alone were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 126 patients were included in this study, 18 of whom demonstrated non-negative cytology of APW. Cell blocks were successfully prepared for 16 cases. SOX17 positivity was observed in 16 cases, including 1 of serous carcinoma, 1 of clear cell carcinoma, and 14 of endometrioid carcinoma (EC). Loss of Pax-2 and PTEN expression was observed in the APWs of the 14 patients with EC. MMR deficiency was noted in two patients with EC, and P53 mutation was noted in another two patients with EC. Compared with 10 metastatic carcinomas (10/18, 55.56%) diagnosed by cytology alone, 15 malignant APWs (15/18, 83.33%) were confirmed through combination cytology and immunocytochemistry. APWs were more likely to be observed in cases with more than half myometrial invasion than those with no or less than half myometrial invasion (<i>P</i> = 0.0067). The probability of malignant APW occurrence was slightly elevated in cases of EC exhibiting microcystic, elongated, and fragmented(MELF) infiltrative growth (<i>P</i> = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SOX17 is a useful Müllerian marker for distinguishing endometrial epithelium in APW. Loss of Pax-2 and PTEN expression offers evidence of metastatic endometrial carcinoma. Furthermore, positive APWs retained molecular features similar to primary lesions. The use of multiple immunocytochemical markers can effectively enhance the diagnostic efficiency of APWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49082,"journal":{"name":"Cytojournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11234350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytojournal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_10_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of immunocytochemistry in diagnosing abdominopelvic washings (APWs) and evaluate the superiority of cytology combined with immunocytochemistry over cytology alone.

Material and methods: Data on APW cytology and available cell blocks from patients who underwent radical surgery for endometrial cancer between January 2021 and December 2022 were reviewed. Cytology was re-evaluated according to a five-tier system. Immunocytochemistry analysis for targets such as Sry box transcription factor 1(SOX17), Paired box gene 2 (Pax-2) protein, Phosphatase and tensin (PTEN), and β-catenin was performed on each case with non-negative cytology. Mismatch repair (MMR) protein and P53 immunocytochemistry analyses were performed using cell blocks from cases with abnormal MMR or P53 expression in their primary lesion. The accuracies of cytology combined with immunocytochemistry and cytology alone were calculated.

Results: Overall, 126 patients were included in this study, 18 of whom demonstrated non-negative cytology of APW. Cell blocks were successfully prepared for 16 cases. SOX17 positivity was observed in 16 cases, including 1 of serous carcinoma, 1 of clear cell carcinoma, and 14 of endometrioid carcinoma (EC). Loss of Pax-2 and PTEN expression was observed in the APWs of the 14 patients with EC. MMR deficiency was noted in two patients with EC, and P53 mutation was noted in another two patients with EC. Compared with 10 metastatic carcinomas (10/18, 55.56%) diagnosed by cytology alone, 15 malignant APWs (15/18, 83.33%) were confirmed through combination cytology and immunocytochemistry. APWs were more likely to be observed in cases with more than half myometrial invasion than those with no or less than half myometrial invasion (P = 0.0067). The probability of malignant APW occurrence was slightly elevated in cases of EC exhibiting microcystic, elongated, and fragmented(MELF) infiltrative growth (P = 0.039).

Conclusion: SOX17 is a useful Müllerian marker for distinguishing endometrial epithelium in APW. Loss of Pax-2 and PTEN expression offers evidence of metastatic endometrial carcinoma. Furthermore, positive APWs retained molecular features similar to primary lesions. The use of multiple immunocytochemical markers can effectively enhance the diagnostic efficiency of APWs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫细胞化学在诊断子宫内膜癌根治术患者腹盆腔冲洗液中的应用。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨免疫细胞化学在诊断腹盆腔冲洗液(APWs)方面的功效,并评估细胞学与免疫细胞化学相结合的方法优于单纯细胞学的方法:对2021年1月至2022年12月期间接受子宫内膜癌根治术的患者的腹盆腔冲洗液细胞学数据和可用细胞块进行回顾。根据五级系统对细胞学进行了重新评估。对每例细胞学非阴性病例进行免疫细胞化学分析,以检测Sry盒转录因子1(SOX17)、配对盒基因2(Pax-2)蛋白、磷酸酶和天丝蛋白(PTEN)以及β-catenin等靶标。错配修复(MMR)蛋白和 P53 免疫细胞化学分析是使用原发病灶中 MMR 或 P53 表达异常的病例的细胞块进行的。计算了细胞学结合免疫细胞化学和单独细胞学的准确率:本研究共纳入 126 例患者,其中 18 例患者的 APW 细胞学检查结果为非阴性。有 16 例成功制备了细胞块。16例观察到SOX17阳性,包括1例浆液性癌、1例透明细胞癌和14例子宫内膜样癌(EC)。在14例EC患者的APW中观察到Pax-2和PTEN表达缺失。2例EC患者出现MMR缺失,另外2例EC患者出现P53突变。与仅通过细胞学确诊的10例转移癌(10/18,55.56%)相比,15例恶性APW(15/18,83.33%)是通过细胞学和免疫细胞化学联合确诊的。与无子宫肌层浸润或子宫肌层浸润不到一半的病例相比,子宫肌层浸润超过一半的病例更容易观察到APW(P = 0.0067)。在呈现微囊状、拉长和碎裂(MELF)浸润性生长的EC病例中,恶性APW发生的概率略有升高(P = 0.039):结论:SOX17是区分APW中子宫内膜上皮的一个有用的Müllerian标记物。Pax-2和PTEN表达的缺失提供了转移性子宫内膜癌的证据。此外,阳性 APW 保留了与原发病灶相似的分子特征。使用多种免疫细胞化学标记物可有效提高APW的诊断效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cytojournal
Cytojournal PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.10%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CytoJournal is an open-access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Diagnostic Cytopathology including Molecular aspects. The journal is owned by the Cytopathology Foundation and published by the Scientific Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing the cytological features and diagnostic significance of cerebrospinal fluid in bacterial meningitis Analyzing histopathological aspects and cell populations in orbital inflammatory involvement in systemic diseases: A case series from the Rheumatologist’s perspective Mitochondrial protein isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase 2 in tumor cells as a potential therapeutic target for cervical cancer. Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the pathological natures of thyroid nodules: A retrospective study. Utility of immunocytochemistry in diagnosing abdominopelvic washings from patients undergoing radical surgery for endometrial cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1