Direct comparison of bone marrow biopsy and PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow infiltration in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis.
{"title":"Direct comparison of bone marrow biopsy and PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow infiltration in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Jie Wang, Qing Zeng","doi":"10.23736/S1824-4785.24.03529-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnostic utility of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) compared to bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) remained to be confirmed. This study aimed to compare BMB and PET/CT for bone marrow infiltration (BMI) in patients with NHL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for papers published up to October 2021. The outcomes were the true positive and negative and false positive and negative rates for BMB and PET/CT. The summarized sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies with a total of 2396 patients were included. Significant differences are observed between BMB and PET/CT for sensitivity (relative ratio: 0.749; 95% CI: 0.586-0.956; P=0.020) and NLR (relative ratio: 1.839; 95% CI: 1.106-3.058; P=0.019), but not for specificity (P=0.819), PLR (P=0.802), and DOR (P=0.150). The summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for BMB is 0.692 (SE: 0.170) and 0.977 (SE: 0.021) for PET/CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PET/CT presents a better sensitivity and NLR for the detection of BMI in patients with NHL, whereas no differences are found regarding specificity, PLR, and DOR compared with BMB.</p>","PeriodicalId":49135,"journal":{"name":"the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1824-4785.24.03529-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The diagnostic utility of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) compared to bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) remained to be confirmed. This study aimed to compare BMB and PET/CT for bone marrow infiltration (BMI) in patients with NHL.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for papers published up to October 2021. The outcomes were the true positive and negative and false positive and negative rates for BMB and PET/CT. The summarized sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated.
Results: Thirteen studies with a total of 2396 patients were included. Significant differences are observed between BMB and PET/CT for sensitivity (relative ratio: 0.749; 95% CI: 0.586-0.956; P=0.020) and NLR (relative ratio: 1.839; 95% CI: 1.106-3.058; P=0.019), but not for specificity (P=0.819), PLR (P=0.802), and DOR (P=0.150). The summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for BMB is 0.692 (SE: 0.170) and 0.977 (SE: 0.021) for PET/CT.
Conclusions: PET/CT presents a better sensitivity and NLR for the detection of BMI in patients with NHL, whereas no differences are found regarding specificity, PLR, and DOR compared with BMB.
期刊介绍：
The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging publishes scientific papers on clinical and experimental topics of nuclear medicine. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles and special articles. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
