Dementia severity at incident diagnosis in a population representative sample of older Americans

Shengjia Xu, Niloofar Fouladi-Nashta, Yi Chen, Julie Zissimopoulos
{"title":"Dementia severity at incident diagnosis in a population representative sample of older Americans","authors":"Shengjia Xu,&nbsp;Niloofar Fouladi-Nashta,&nbsp;Yi Chen,&nbsp;Julie Zissimopoulos","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>We provide the first analysis of distribution of dementia severity at incident diagnosis for a population representative sample of older Americans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS), the Health Retirement Study (HRS), and traditional Medicare claims, we estimated the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale for ADAMS respondents and applied parameter estimates to predict dementia severity for HRS respondents with claims-based incident dementia diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy percent of older adults received a dementia diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia (early stages). Fewer individuals were diagnosed at early stages in years 2000 to 2008 (65%) compared to years 2009 to 2016 (76%). About 72% of non-Hispanic white persons were diagnosed at early stages, compared to 63% non-Hispanic black and 59% Hispanic persons. More males than females were diagnosed at early stages (75% vs 67%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>These data linkages allow population surveillance of early and equitable dementia detection in the older US population to assess clinical and policy levers to improve detection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>For the US population 70 and older, 30% were diagnosed with dementia at a moderate or severe stage.</li>\n \n <li>Fewer were diagnosed at early stages in years 2000 to 2008 compared to 2009 to 2016 (65% vs 76%).</li>\n \n <li>A total of 72% of white persons were diagnosed at early stages, compared to 63% black and 59% Hispanic persons.</li>\n \n <li>More males than females were diagnosed at early stages (75% vs 67%).</li>\n \n <li>High wealth and education level were associated with diagnosis at early stages disease.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.12491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We provide the first analysis of distribution of dementia severity at incident diagnosis for a population representative sample of older Americans.

METHODS

Using data from the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS), the Health Retirement Study (HRS), and traditional Medicare claims, we estimated the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale for ADAMS respondents and applied parameter estimates to predict dementia severity for HRS respondents with claims-based incident dementia diagnosis.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of older adults received a dementia diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia (early stages). Fewer individuals were diagnosed at early stages in years 2000 to 2008 (65%) compared to years 2009 to 2016 (76%). About 72% of non-Hispanic white persons were diagnosed at early stages, compared to 63% non-Hispanic black and 59% Hispanic persons. More males than females were diagnosed at early stages (75% vs 67%).

DISCUSSION

These data linkages allow population surveillance of early and equitable dementia detection in the older US population to assess clinical and policy levers to improve detection.

Highlights

  • For the US population 70 and older, 30% were diagnosed with dementia at a moderate or severe stage.
  • Fewer were diagnosed at early stages in years 2000 to 2008 compared to 2009 to 2016 (65% vs 76%).
  • A total of 72% of white persons were diagnosed at early stages, compared to 63% black and 59% Hispanic persons.
  • More males than females were diagnosed at early stages (75% vs 67%).
  • High wealth and education level were associated with diagnosis at early stages disease.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有人口代表性的美国老年人样本中事件诊断时痴呆症的严重程度。
简介:我们首次对具有人口代表性的美国老年人样本进行了分析:我们首次分析了具有人口代表性的美国老年人样本在事件诊断时痴呆症严重程度的分布情况:利用老龄化、人口统计和记忆研究(ADAMS)、健康退休研究(HRS)以及传统医疗保险报销单的数据,我们对ADAMS受访者的临床痴呆评定量表进行了估算,并应用参数估算结果对HRS受访者的痴呆严重程度进行了预测,这些受访者的痴呆诊断是基于报销单的:70%的老年人被诊断为轻度认知障碍或轻度痴呆(早期)。与 2009 年至 2016 年(76%)相比,2000 年至 2008 年被诊断为早期阶段的人数较少(65%)。约 72% 的非西班牙裔白人被诊断为早期阶段,而非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔人的这一比例分别为 63% 和 59%。早期诊断的男性多于女性(75% 对 67%):讨论:通过这些数据链接,可对美国老年人口中早期和公平痴呆症检测情况进行人口监测,以评估临床和政策杠杆,提高检测率:2000年至2008年与2009年至2016年相比,早期诊断出痴呆症的人数较少(分别为65%和76%)。早期诊断出痴呆症的白人占72%,而黑人和西班牙裔分别占63%和59%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
Anticholinergic drugs and dementia risk: Using stem cell–based studies to complement pharmacoepidemiology Data-driven discovery of associations between prescribed drugs and dementia risk: A systematic review Perspective: Minimally clinically important “symptomatic” benefit associated with disease modification resulting from anti-amyloid immunotherapy Dynamic neurocognitive adaptation in aging: Development and validation of a new scale Unraveling the impact of blood RANKL and OPG levels on Alzheimer's disease: Independent of bone mineral density and inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1