Evaluation of the proximal femur using the digital photographs: Does change in proximal femur position due to anteversion affect the measurement of the size of the femoral head diameter?

Olasode Israel Akinmokun, Utibeabasi Ime Edem, Olanrewaju Matthew Adeoye
{"title":"Evaluation of the proximal femur using the digital photographs: Does change in proximal femur position due to anteversion affect the measurement of the size of the femoral head diameter?","authors":"Olasode Israel Akinmokun, Utibeabasi Ime Edem, Olanrewaju Matthew Adeoye","doi":"10.4103/jwas.jwas_145_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A plain pelvic radiograph is usually conducted with the lower limbs in internal rotation. This is to correct the anteversion of the femur. However, in the fracture neck of the femur, internal rotation of the fractured limb is avoided, because it would be painful. We examined the effect of correction of anteversion or otherwise on the diameter of the head of the femur using imaging.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine if there was a significant difference between the femoral head diameter at two different positions, at the normal anatomical position (without correcting the anteversion) and at the corrected anteversion position. It also aimed to document the correlation and the statistical significance between the differences in the size of the diameter at these two different positions with the anteversion angles of the femoral bone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two sets of digital photographs of the proximal part of 55 non-sexed, non-paired femoral bones were taken. Images obtained were at two positions: normal anatomical (with anteversion uncorrected) and anteversion corrected positions. The diameters of the head of the femur were documented at these two different positions. The anteversion angles and actual femoral head (AFH) diameters were also measured and documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The femoral head diameters at anatomical positions were persistently larger than those measured after the anteversion was corrected, except in three femoral bones (5%) where no differences were observed. The difference in the two measurements was statistically significant to the anteversion angle of the femoral bone. (<i>P</i> = 0.0005). The means of the two sets of measurements were statistically different from each other. Pairwise correlation showed that both were strongly associated with the AFH diameter but the measurements from images with corrected anteversion had a higher value (0.8166) than the measurements from normal anatomical position (0.7526).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The correction of femoral anteversion produced femoral head size measurements that were closer to AFH diameters compared to those without the correction of the femoral anteversion. Femoral anteversion should always be corrected as per protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":73993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_145_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A plain pelvic radiograph is usually conducted with the lower limbs in internal rotation. This is to correct the anteversion of the femur. However, in the fracture neck of the femur, internal rotation of the fractured limb is avoided, because it would be painful. We examined the effect of correction of anteversion or otherwise on the diameter of the head of the femur using imaging.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine if there was a significant difference between the femoral head diameter at two different positions, at the normal anatomical position (without correcting the anteversion) and at the corrected anteversion position. It also aimed to document the correlation and the statistical significance between the differences in the size of the diameter at these two different positions with the anteversion angles of the femoral bone.

Materials and methods: Two sets of digital photographs of the proximal part of 55 non-sexed, non-paired femoral bones were taken. Images obtained were at two positions: normal anatomical (with anteversion uncorrected) and anteversion corrected positions. The diameters of the head of the femur were documented at these two different positions. The anteversion angles and actual femoral head (AFH) diameters were also measured and documented.

Results: The femoral head diameters at anatomical positions were persistently larger than those measured after the anteversion was corrected, except in three femoral bones (5%) where no differences were observed. The difference in the two measurements was statistically significant to the anteversion angle of the femoral bone. (P = 0.0005). The means of the two sets of measurements were statistically different from each other. Pairwise correlation showed that both were strongly associated with the AFH diameter but the measurements from images with corrected anteversion had a higher value (0.8166) than the measurements from normal anatomical position (0.7526).

Conclusion: The correction of femoral anteversion produced femoral head size measurements that were closer to AFH diameters compared to those without the correction of the femoral anteversion. Femoral anteversion should always be corrected as per protocol.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用数码照片评估股骨近端:股骨前端位置的变化是否会影响股骨头直径的测量?
背景:骨盆平片通常是在下肢内旋的情况下拍摄的。这是为了纠正股骨内翻。然而,在股骨颈骨折的情况下,骨折肢体应避免内旋,因为内旋会造成疼痛。我们通过影像学检查了矫正股骨内翻与否对股骨头直径的影响:本研究旨在确定股骨头直径在两个不同位置(正常解剖位置(未纠正内翻)和纠正内翻位置)是否存在显著差异。研究还旨在记录这两个不同位置的直径大小差异与股骨头内翻角度之间的相关性和统计学意义:对 55 块无性别、无配对的股骨近端部分拍摄了两组数码照片。获得的图像位于两个位置:正常解剖位置(未校正股骨前倾角)和股骨前倾角校正位置。在这两个不同位置记录股骨头的直径。此外,还测量并记录了股骨头内翻角度和实际股骨头直径(AFH):结果:在解剖位置测量的股骨头直径一直大于纠正内翻后测量的股骨头直径,只有三块股骨头(5%)没有发现差异。两种测量结果的差异与股骨头的内翻角度有显著的统计学意义。(P = 0.0005).两组测量结果的平均值在统计学上存在差异。配对相关性显示,两者都与 AFH 直径密切相关,但从校正后的内翻图像中进行的测量值(0.8166)高于从正常解剖位置进行的测量值(0.7526):结论:与未修正股骨内翻的测量结果相比,修正股骨内翻所得出的股骨头大小测量值更接近AFH直径。股骨内翻应始终按照方案进行矫正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Weighing it Down": Technique to Reduce the Weight of an Obturator. A Prospective Study on Tibial Shaft Fractures Treated with Suprapatellar Approach. An Unusual Presentation of Intestinal Obstruction: Uterine Perforation and Bowel Herniation Following Manual Vacuum Aspiration. Assessment of the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthopaedic Surgery Training Among Orthopaedic Residents in Southern Nigeria. Computed Tomographic Scan for Head Injury Patients: Any Justification for Adapting Routine Cranio-Cervical Examination Irrespective of Clinical Severity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1