Intrapartum fetal monitoring practices in Norway: A population-based study

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101006
Kristin Jerve Aanstad , Are Hugo Pripp , Rebecka Dalbye , Aase Devold Pay , Anne Cathrine Staff , Anne Kaasen , Ellen Blix
{"title":"Intrapartum fetal monitoring practices in Norway: A population-based study","authors":"Kristin Jerve Aanstad ,&nbsp;Are Hugo Pripp ,&nbsp;Rebecka Dalbye ,&nbsp;Aase Devold Pay ,&nbsp;Anne Cathrine Staff ,&nbsp;Anne Kaasen ,&nbsp;Ellen Blix","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe intrapartum fetal monitoring methods used in all births in Norway in 2019–2020, assess adherence to national guidelines, investigate variation by women’s risk status, and explore associations influencing monitoring practices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A nationwide population-based study. We collected data about all pregnancies with a gestational age ≥ 22 weeks during 2019–2020 from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. We used descriptive analyses, stratified for risk status, to examine fetal monitoring methods used in all deliveries. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with monitoring with cardiotocography (CTG) in low-risk, straightforward births.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 14 285 (14%) deliveries were monitored with only intermittent auscultation (IA), 46<!--> <!-->214 (46%) with only CTG, and 33<!--> <!-->417 (34%) with IA and CTG combined. Four percent (2 067/50 533) of women with risk factors were monitored with IA only. Half (10<!--> <!-->589/21 282) of the low-risk women with straightforward births were monitored with CTG. Maternal and fetal characteristics, size of the birth unit and regional practices influenced use of CTG monitoring in this group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most births are monitored with CTG only, or combined with IA. Half the women with low-risk pregnancies and straightforward births were monitored with CTG although national guidelines recommending IA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101006"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000612/pdfft?md5=1d6e4bab27e5a32168952a5dc7978939&pid=1-s2.0-S1877575624000612-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To describe intrapartum fetal monitoring methods used in all births in Norway in 2019–2020, assess adherence to national guidelines, investigate variation by women’s risk status, and explore associations influencing monitoring practices.

Methods

A nationwide population-based study. We collected data about all pregnancies with a gestational age ≥ 22 weeks during 2019–2020 from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. We used descriptive analyses, stratified for risk status, to examine fetal monitoring methods used in all deliveries. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with monitoring with cardiotocography (CTG) in low-risk, straightforward births.

Results

In total, 14 285 (14%) deliveries were monitored with only intermittent auscultation (IA), 46 214 (46%) with only CTG, and 33 417 (34%) with IA and CTG combined. Four percent (2 067/50 533) of women with risk factors were monitored with IA only. Half (10 589/21 282) of the low-risk women with straightforward births were monitored with CTG. Maternal and fetal characteristics, size of the birth unit and regional practices influenced use of CTG monitoring in this group.

Conclusions

Most births are monitored with CTG only, or combined with IA. Half the women with low-risk pregnancies and straightforward births were monitored with CTG although national guidelines recommending IA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威的产前胎儿监护实践:一项基于人口的研究。
挪威描述2019-2020年挪威所有分娩中使用的产前胎儿监护方法,评估国家指南的遵守情况,调查产妇风险状况的差异,并探讨影响监护方法的相关因素:方法:这是一项基于人口的全国性研究。我们从挪威出生医学登记处收集了2019-2020年间胎龄≥22周的所有孕妇的数据。我们采用描述性分析,根据风险状况进行分层,研究了所有分娩中使用的胎儿监护方法。我们使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型来确定在低风险顺产中使用心脏排卵造影(CTG)监测的相关因素:共有 14 285 例(14%)分娩仅使用间歇性听诊(IA)监测,46214 例(46%)仅使用 CTG 监测,33417 例(34%)使用 IA 和 CTG 联合监测。4%(2 067/50 533)有风险因素的产妇只接受了 IA 监测。半数(10589/21 282)顺产的低危产妇接受了 CTG 监测。产妇和胎儿的特征、产房的规模和地区惯例影响了 CTG 监测在这一群体中的使用:大多数产妇仅使用 CTG 或结合 IA 进行监测。尽管国家指南建议使用 IA,但半数低危妊娠和顺产产妇使用 CTG 监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
Facilitators and barriers for digital screening and a supportive intervention within antenatal care among danish pregnant women facing intimate partner violence: A qualitative study nested in the STOP study I had to tell to survive“- a cross-sectional study on exposure to intimate partner violence in pregnant women and the importance of screening Assessing awareness of danger signs of pregnancy and its associated factors among pregnant women in Libya: A cross-sectional study Storytelling in midwifery: ‘Not just for entertainment’ A qualitative exploration of the client-provider relationship and its role in discussing sexual health and HIV among African American women in the US South
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1