Comparison of 8th and 7th editions of TNM staging in terms of mortality, persistent disease, and response to treatment in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Golnaz Gholami, Atena Aghaee, Susan Shafiei, Bashir Rasoulian, Emran Askari, Samira Zare Namdar, Seyed Rasoul Zakavi
{"title":"Comparison of 8th and 7th editions of TNM staging in terms of mortality, persistent disease, and response to treatment in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.","authors":"Golnaz Gholami, Atena Aghaee, Susan Shafiei, Bashir Rasoulian, Emran Askari, Samira Zare Namdar, Seyed Rasoul Zakavi","doi":"10.1055/a-2344-6638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the eighth and seventh editions of TNM staging (TNM-8 and TNM-7) on disease-related mortality, persistent disease, and response to treatment in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We studied 400 patients (79% female) with DTC with a mean age of 40.93±14.11 years. TNM staging was recorded according to the 7th and 8th editions and patients were followed for at least 1 year and response to therapy was recorded according to ATA response categorization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow up time was 42.5±15.24 months. Overall, 108 patients (27%) were down-staged using the TNM-8, mainly due to the changes in the age cut-off (14.5%), N (9.25%), and T categorization (3.25%). All patients in stage III and 82.8% in stage IV were down-staged. The mean Tg levels were significantly higher in stages III and IV in TNM-8 compared to TNM-7. Four disease-related death were recorded during follow up, all in stage IV according to TNM-7, while one was in stage II according to TNM-8. One year after treatment, persistent disease was detected in 12% and 77% of patients in stage III according to the 7th and 8th editions, respectively (P= 0.04). Similarly, biochemical incomplete response one year after treatment was seen in 7.3% and 87% in stage III disease using 7th and 8th editions (P = 0.006) that fell to 2.4% and 22% in the last visit respectively (P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persistent disease and incomplete response to therapy were more common in stages III and IV in TNM-8 compared to TNM-7. The eighth edition was a better predictor of persistent disease in stages III and IV disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2344-6638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the eighth and seventh editions of TNM staging (TNM-8 and TNM-7) on disease-related mortality, persistent disease, and response to treatment in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

Methods and materials: We studied 400 patients (79% female) with DTC with a mean age of 40.93±14.11 years. TNM staging was recorded according to the 7th and 8th editions and patients were followed for at least 1 year and response to therapy was recorded according to ATA response categorization.

Results: The mean follow up time was 42.5±15.24 months. Overall, 108 patients (27%) were down-staged using the TNM-8, mainly due to the changes in the age cut-off (14.5%), N (9.25%), and T categorization (3.25%). All patients in stage III and 82.8% in stage IV were down-staged. The mean Tg levels were significantly higher in stages III and IV in TNM-8 compared to TNM-7. Four disease-related death were recorded during follow up, all in stage IV according to TNM-7, while one was in stage II according to TNM-8. One year after treatment, persistent disease was detected in 12% and 77% of patients in stage III according to the 7th and 8th editions, respectively (P= 0.04). Similarly, biochemical incomplete response one year after treatment was seen in 7.3% and 87% in stage III disease using 7th and 8th editions (P = 0.006) that fell to 2.4% and 22% in the last visit respectively (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: Persistent disease and incomplete response to therapy were more common in stages III and IV in TNM-8 compared to TNM-7. The eighth edition was a better predictor of persistent disease in stages III and IV disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第8版和第7版TNM分期在分化型甲状腺癌患者死亡率、顽固性疾病和治疗反应方面的比较。
目的比较第八版和第七版TNM分期(TNM-8和TNM-7)对分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者疾病相关死亡率、持续性疾病和治疗反应的影响:我们对平均年龄为 40.93±14.11 岁的 400 名 DTC 患者(79% 为女性)进行了研究。根据第 7 版和第 8 版记录 TNM 分期,对患者进行至少 1 年的随访,并根据 ATA 反应分类记录治疗反应:平均随访时间为(42.5±15.24)个月。总体而言,108 名患者(27%)使用 TNM-8 进行了降期,主要是由于年龄分界线(14.5%)、N(9.25%)和 T 分类(3.25%)的变化。所有Ⅲ期和82.8%的Ⅳ期患者都进行了降期。与TNM-7相比,TNM-8中III期和IV期患者的平均Tg水平明显更高。随访期间共记录到四例与疾病相关的死亡病例,根据TNM-7标准均为IV期,而根据TNM-8标准则为II期。治疗一年后,根据第 7 版和第 8 版,分别有 12% 和 77% 的 III 期患者发现疾病持续存在(P= 0.04)。同样,根据第 7 版和第 8 版,治疗一年后生化反应不完全的 III 期患者分别占 7.3% 和 87%(P=0.006),最后一次就诊时分别降至 2.4% 和 22%(P=0.04):结论:与TNM-7版相比,TNM-8版中的III期和IV期患者更容易出现疾病持续存在和治疗反应不完全的情况。第八版TNM更能预测III期和IV期的持续性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Thoracic SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Tumor on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Different molecular imaging methods for localization and diagnosis of a mesenchymal tumor causing osteomalacia. Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT with 18F-FDG-PET/CT limited to skull base to upper abdomen for primary staging of lung cancer - a retrospective explorative analysis. Superimposing kidneys in [99mTc]MAG-3 and [99mTc]DMSA-scintigraphy in a tricky case of an extensive, displacing growing retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Peculiar Pattern of Response Following [225Ac]Ac-PSMA Therapy: A Case Report with 'PSA Pseudoregression' Response Pattern.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1