Serum leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) levels in patients with Takayasu's and Giant cell arteritis: A cross-sectional study

Rahime Aksoy , Tahsin Murat Turgay , Recep Yilmaz , Serdar Sezer , Müçteba Enes Yayla , Emine Uslu Yurteri
{"title":"Serum leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) levels in patients with Takayasu's and Giant cell arteritis: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Rahime Aksoy ,&nbsp;Tahsin Murat Turgay ,&nbsp;Recep Yilmaz ,&nbsp;Serdar Sezer ,&nbsp;Müçteba Enes Yayla ,&nbsp;Emine Uslu Yurteri","doi":"10.1016/j.reumae.2024.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>In this study, we aimed to evaluate LIF levels and its possible relationship with disease activity in patients with Takayasu's (TAK) and Giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>23 Takayasu's arteritis, 9 Giant cell arteritis patients and 25 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Serum LIF levels were measured ELISA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of Giant cell arteritis patients was statistically significantly higher than the other groups (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). The rate of women was found to be higher in Takayasu's arteritis (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.021). When healthy control, patients with GCA and Takayasu arteritis were compared, there was a difference in LIF values (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.018). In subgroup analyzes, LIF values were found to be higher in GCA patients compared to healthy controls (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between LIF and CRP (Rho<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.038, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.778), ESR (Rho<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.114, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.399) and ITAS (Rho<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.357, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.094). While CRP was statistically significantly higher in patients with disease activity (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003), there was no statistically significant difference between patients in terms of ESR and LIF values. While there was a statistically significant relationship between CRP (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.19 [1.03–1.37], <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.018) and disease activity in univariate analyses, no statistically significant variable was found in multivariable analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LIF values were significantly higher in patients with Giant cell arteritis compared to healthy controls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94193,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173574324000820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

In this study, we aimed to evaluate LIF levels and its possible relationship with disease activity in patients with Takayasu's (TAK) and Giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients.

Materials and methods

23 Takayasu's arteritis, 9 Giant cell arteritis patients and 25 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Serum LIF levels were measured ELISA.

Results

The mean age of Giant cell arteritis patients was statistically significantly higher than the other groups (p < 0.001). The rate of women was found to be higher in Takayasu's arteritis (p = 0.021). When healthy control, patients with GCA and Takayasu arteritis were compared, there was a difference in LIF values (p = 0.018). In subgroup analyzes, LIF values were found to be higher in GCA patients compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between LIF and CRP (Rho = −0.038, p = 0.778), ESR (Rho = 0.114, p = 0.399) and ITAS (Rho = −0.357, p = 0.094). While CRP was statistically significantly higher in patients with disease activity (p = 0.003), there was no statistically significant difference between patients in terms of ESR and LIF values. While there was a statistically significant relationship between CRP (OR = 1.19 [1.03–1.37], p = 0.018) and disease activity in univariate analyses, no statistically significant variable was found in multivariable analyses.

Conclusions

LIF values were significantly higher in patients with Giant cell arteritis compared to healthy controls.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高安症和巨细胞动脉炎患者的血清白血病抑制因子 (LIF) 水平:横断面研究
导言和目的在这项研究中,我们旨在评估高安氏(TAK)和巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者的 LIF 水平及其与疾病活动的可能关系。结果巨细胞动脉炎患者的平均年龄在统计学上明显高于其他组别(p <0.001)。高安氏动脉炎患者中女性比例更高(p = 0.021)。健康对照组、GCA 患者和高安动脉炎患者的 LIF 值存在差异(p = 0.018)。在亚组分析中发现,与健康对照组相比,GCA 患者的 LIF 值更高(p <0.05)。LIF 与 CRP(Rho = -0.038,p = 0.778)、ESR(Rho = 0.114,p = 0.399)和 ITAS(Rho = -0.357,p = 0.094)之间没有统计学意义上的相关性。在统计学上,疾病活动期患者的 CRP 明显更高(p = 0.003),但在统计学上,不同患者的 ESR 和 LIF 值没有明显差异。在单变量分析中,CRP(OR = 1.19 [1.03-1.37],p = 0.018)与疾病活动性之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系,但在多变量分析中未发现统计学意义上的显著变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fibromyalgia with elevated rheumatoid factor is associated with poor therapeutic response but not with progression to rheumatoid arthritis. Prospective cohort study. Inclusion Body Myositis: A Late Diagnosis Case Report. Prevalence of occipital enthesophyte in non-inflammatory and inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of gravitational therapy in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis. Clinical Practice Mexican Guidelines for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: 2024 Update.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1