Approach to interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis—A survey to pulmonologists and rheumatologists in Colombia

Javier Leonardo Galindo , Olga Milena García , Diana Rocío Gil , Luis Javier Cajas , Emily Rincón-Álvarez , Manuela Rubio
{"title":"Approach to interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis—A survey to pulmonologists and rheumatologists in Colombia","authors":"Javier Leonardo Galindo ,&nbsp;Olga Milena García ,&nbsp;Diana Rocío Gil ,&nbsp;Luis Javier Cajas ,&nbsp;Emily Rincón-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Manuela Rubio","doi":"10.1016/j.reumae.2023.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Interstitial lung disease is a leading cause of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding screening, rescreening, diagnosis, and follow-up practices in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) in Colombia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A structured survey focused on clinical practices in patients with SSc-ILD was conducted. Members of the Asociación Colombiana de Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax (Asoneumocito) and the Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología (Asoreuma) were invited to participate from March 2023 to May 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We surveyed 51 pulmonologists and 44 rheumatologists. Overall, 51.6% reported having access to multidisciplinary team discussion in ILD. Among the 95 participants, 78.9% would routinely perform a high-resolution computed tomography scan of the chest once a diagnosis of systemic sclerosis was established. This practice is more frequent among rheumatologists (84.1%) than among pulmonologists (74.5%). Approximately half of the participants would rescreen patients annually with computed tomography scan (56.8%) if baseline images were negative.</p><p>Spirometry (81.1%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (80.0%), and 6-min walk test (55.8%) were the most frequently performed tests upon diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. During follow-up, participants would consider repeating pulmonary function tests mostly every 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Screening of SSc-ILD is high among pulmonologists and rheumatologists. Decision-making on diagnosis and follow-up is similar between specialties, but there are variations in their frequency and indications. Further research is needed to evaluate how to adapt recommendations for assessing SSc-ILD in different settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94193,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173574324000819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Interstitial lung disease is a leading cause of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding screening, rescreening, diagnosis, and follow-up practices in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD) in Colombia.

Methods

A structured survey focused on clinical practices in patients with SSc-ILD was conducted. Members of the Asociación Colombiana de Neumología y Cirugía de Tórax (Asoneumocito) and the Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología (Asoreuma) were invited to participate from March 2023 to May 2023.

Results

We surveyed 51 pulmonologists and 44 rheumatologists. Overall, 51.6% reported having access to multidisciplinary team discussion in ILD. Among the 95 participants, 78.9% would routinely perform a high-resolution computed tomography scan of the chest once a diagnosis of systemic sclerosis was established. This practice is more frequent among rheumatologists (84.1%) than among pulmonologists (74.5%). Approximately half of the participants would rescreen patients annually with computed tomography scan (56.8%) if baseline images were negative.

Spirometry (81.1%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (80.0%), and 6-min walk test (55.8%) were the most frequently performed tests upon diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. During follow-up, participants would consider repeating pulmonary function tests mostly every 6 months.

Conclusions

Screening of SSc-ILD is high among pulmonologists and rheumatologists. Decision-making on diagnosis and follow-up is similar between specialties, but there are variations in their frequency and indications. Further research is needed to evaluate how to adapt recommendations for assessing SSc-ILD in different settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗与系统性硬化症相关的间质性肺病的方法--对哥伦比亚肺病专家和风湿病专家的调查
导言间质性肺病是导致系统性硬化症患者死亡的主要原因。目前,哥伦比亚尚未就系统性硬化症相关间质性肺病(SSc-ILD)的筛查、再筛查、诊断和随访方法达成共识。结果我们调查了51名肺科医生和44名风湿免疫科医生。总体而言,51.6%的人表示有机会参加 ILD 多学科团队讨论。在 95 名参与者中,78.9% 的人在确诊为系统性硬化症后会常规进行胸部高分辨率计算机断层扫描。这种做法在风湿免疫科医生(84.1%)中比在肺病医生(74.5%)中更为常见。肺活量测定(81.1%)、一氧化碳肺弥散容量(80.0%)和 6 分钟步行测试(55.8%)是诊断出系统性硬化症后最常进行的检查。结论肺科医生和风湿科医生对 SSc-ILD 的筛查率很高。结论肺科和风湿免疫科医生对 SSc-ILD 的筛查率很高,各专科在诊断和随访方面的决策相似,但在频率和适应症方面存在差异。需要进一步开展研究,评估如何在不同情况下调整评估 SSc-ILD 的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fibromyalgia with elevated rheumatoid factor is associated with poor therapeutic response but not with progression to rheumatoid arthritis. Prospective cohort study. Inclusion Body Myositis: A Late Diagnosis Case Report. Prevalence of occipital enthesophyte in non-inflammatory and inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of gravitational therapy in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis. Clinical Practice Mexican Guidelines for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: 2024 Update.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1