Predictive quantitative multidetector computed tomography models for characterization of renal cell carcinoma subtypes and differentiation from renal oncocytoma: nomogram algorithmic approach analysis

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1186/s43055-024-01308-w
Haytham Shebel, Heba M. Abou El Atta, Tarek El-Diasty, Doaa Elsayed Sharaf
{"title":"Predictive quantitative multidetector computed tomography models for characterization of renal cell carcinoma subtypes and differentiation from renal oncocytoma: nomogram algorithmic approach analysis","authors":"Haytham Shebel, Heba M. Abou El Atta, Tarek El-Diasty, Doaa Elsayed Sharaf","doi":"10.1186/s43055-024-01308-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our objective is to develop an algorithmic approach using predictive models to discriminate between common solid renal masses, including renal cell carcinoma [RCC] subtypes and renal oncocytoma [RO], using multiphase computed tomography [CT]. We retrospectively analyzed a group of solid renal masses between January 2011 and January 2023 regarding the CT attenuation values using a multiphase multidetector CT and clinical parameters. Inclusion criteria included patients who had four phases of CT with a partial or radical nephrectomy. Exclusion criteria were patients with biphasic or one-phase CT, poor imaging quality, patients under surveillance, radiofrequency ablation, or indeterminate pathology findings as oncocytic tumor variants. We divided our cohort into training and internal validation sets. Our results revealed that a total of 467 cases, 351 patients assigned for the training cohort and 116 cases assigned for validation cohort. There is a significant difference between hypervascular clear RCC [CRCC and RO] and hypovascular chromophobe and papillary [ChRCC and PRCC] masses in both training and validation sets, AUC = 0.95, 0.98, respectively. The predictive model for differentiation between CRCC and RO showed AUC = 0.83, 0.85 in both training and validation sets, respectively. At the same time, the discrimination of ChRCC from PRCC showed AUC = 0.94 in the training set and 0.93 in the validation cohort. Using the largest sample to our knowledge, we developed a three-phase analytical approach to initiate a practical method to discriminate between different solid renal masses that can be used in daily clinical practice. ","PeriodicalId":11540,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-024-01308-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our objective is to develop an algorithmic approach using predictive models to discriminate between common solid renal masses, including renal cell carcinoma [RCC] subtypes and renal oncocytoma [RO], using multiphase computed tomography [CT]. We retrospectively analyzed a group of solid renal masses between January 2011 and January 2023 regarding the CT attenuation values using a multiphase multidetector CT and clinical parameters. Inclusion criteria included patients who had four phases of CT with a partial or radical nephrectomy. Exclusion criteria were patients with biphasic or one-phase CT, poor imaging quality, patients under surveillance, radiofrequency ablation, or indeterminate pathology findings as oncocytic tumor variants. We divided our cohort into training and internal validation sets. Our results revealed that a total of 467 cases, 351 patients assigned for the training cohort and 116 cases assigned for validation cohort. There is a significant difference between hypervascular clear RCC [CRCC and RO] and hypovascular chromophobe and papillary [ChRCC and PRCC] masses in both training and validation sets, AUC = 0.95, 0.98, respectively. The predictive model for differentiation between CRCC and RO showed AUC = 0.83, 0.85 in both training and validation sets, respectively. At the same time, the discrimination of ChRCC from PRCC showed AUC = 0.94 in the training set and 0.93 in the validation cohort. Using the largest sample to our knowledge, we developed a three-phase analytical approach to initiate a practical method to discriminate between different solid renal masses that can be used in daily clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于描述肾细胞癌亚型和与肾肿瘤细胞瘤鉴别的预测性定量多载体计算机断层扫描模型:提名图算法方法分析
我们的目标是开发一种算法方法,利用预测模型通过多相计算机断层扫描(CT)来区分常见的实性肾肿块,包括肾细胞癌(RCC)亚型和肾肿瘤(RO)。我们回顾性分析了2011年1月至2023年1月期间一组实性肾肿块的多相多载体CT衰减值和临床参数。纳入标准包括接受过肾部分或根治性切除术的四期 CT 患者。排除标准包括双相或单相 CT 患者、成像质量差的患者、接受监控的患者、射频消融患者或病理结果不确定为肿瘤细胞变异的患者。我们将队列分为训练集和内部验证集。结果显示,共有 467 个病例,其中 351 例患者被分配到训练组,116 例被分配到验证组。在训练集和验证集中,高血管透明 RCC [CRCC 和 RO] 肿块与高血管嗜铬细胞和乳头状肿块 [ChRCC 和 PRCC] 肿块之间存在明显差异,AUC 分别为 0.95 和 0.98。区分 CRCC 和 RO 的预测模型在训练集和验证集的 AUC 分别为 0.83 和 0.85。同时,区分 ChRCC 和 PRCC 的训练集 AUC = 0.94,验证组 AUC = 0.93。我们利用迄今为止最大的样本,开发了一种三阶段分析方法,以启动一种实用的方法来鉴别不同的肾实性肿块,该方法可用于日常临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fetal hemochromatosis: rare case of hepatic and extrahepatic siderosis involving thyroid on fetal MRI Ultrasound-guided combined intra-articular corticosteroids injection and suprascapular nerve block for pain control in patients with frozen shoulder Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in management of pulmonary embolism Role of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes Explainability, transparency and black box challenges of AI in radiology: impact on patient care in cardiovascular radiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1