Understanding the GDPR from a requirements engineering perspective—a systematic mapping study on regulatory data protection requirements

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Requirements Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s00766-024-00423-4
Claudia Negri-Ribalta, Marius Lombard-Platet, Camille Salinesi
{"title":"Understanding the GDPR from a requirements engineering perspective—a systematic mapping study on regulatory data protection requirements","authors":"Claudia Negri-Ribalta, Marius Lombard-Platet, Camille Salinesi","doi":"10.1007/s00766-024-00423-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data protection compliance is critical from a requirements engineering (RE) perspective, both from a software development lifecycle (SDLC) perspective and regulatory compliance. Not including these requirements from the early phases of the SDLC can prove costly and challenging afterward. The general data protection regulation (GDPR) from the European Union (EU) sets a list of requirements that organizations working within its scope should satisfy. However, these requirements are complex to work with, as legal prose tends to be vague and imprecise, and not all requirements have received the same attention from researchers. This study aims to identify the research published in RE for helping compliance with regulatory data protection requirements. We gathered and analyzed 90 articles from 2016 to 2022 through a systematic mapping study. We analyzed key trends in the sample, such as year of publication, publication venue, type of research, interdisciplinarity in the author’s background, GDPR focus of compliance element, and type of proposal. Our main findings show ongoing interest, mostly published in conferences, in achieving overall compliance with the GDPR and consent as the most popular topics. Other topics, such as cookies or children’s data, did not receive significant attention. Research over the whole RE process has been done. 20 (22%) of the papers have authors affiliated with non-computer science; however, most research seems not interdisciplinary. We finally discuss gaps in the literature, possible future areas of research, and the importance of interdisciplinary research for regulatory data protection requirements in RE.</p>","PeriodicalId":20912,"journal":{"name":"Requirements Engineering","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-024-00423-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data protection compliance is critical from a requirements engineering (RE) perspective, both from a software development lifecycle (SDLC) perspective and regulatory compliance. Not including these requirements from the early phases of the SDLC can prove costly and challenging afterward. The general data protection regulation (GDPR) from the European Union (EU) sets a list of requirements that organizations working within its scope should satisfy. However, these requirements are complex to work with, as legal prose tends to be vague and imprecise, and not all requirements have received the same attention from researchers. This study aims to identify the research published in RE for helping compliance with regulatory data protection requirements. We gathered and analyzed 90 articles from 2016 to 2022 through a systematic mapping study. We analyzed key trends in the sample, such as year of publication, publication venue, type of research, interdisciplinarity in the author’s background, GDPR focus of compliance element, and type of proposal. Our main findings show ongoing interest, mostly published in conferences, in achieving overall compliance with the GDPR and consent as the most popular topics. Other topics, such as cookies or children’s data, did not receive significant attention. Research over the whole RE process has been done. 20 (22%) of the papers have authors affiliated with non-computer science; however, most research seems not interdisciplinary. We finally discuss gaps in the literature, possible future areas of research, and the importance of interdisciplinary research for regulatory data protection requirements in RE.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从需求工程角度理解 GDPR--关于数据保护监管要求的系统映射研究
从需求工程(RE)的角度来看,无论是从软件开发生命周期(SDLC)的角度还是从监管合规性的角度来看,数据保护合规性都至关重要。如果在 SDLC 的早期阶段不纳入这些要求,就会造成高昂的成本,并在之后面临挑战。欧盟(EU)的一般数据保护法规(GDPR)列出了在其范围内工作的组织应满足的一系列要求。然而,由于法律散文往往含糊不清、不够精确,而且并非所有要求都得到了研究人员的同等关注,因此这些要求在工作中非常复杂。本研究旨在确定 RE 中发表的有助于遵守数据保护监管要求的研究。我们通过系统的绘图研究,收集并分析了 2016 年至 2022 年的 90 篇文章。我们分析了样本中的主要趋势,如发表年份、发表地点、研究类型、作者背景中的跨学科性、合规要素的 GDPR 重点以及提案类型。我们的主要研究结果表明,人们对实现全面遵守 GDPR 和 "同意 "这一最受欢迎的主题一直很感兴趣,这些主题大多是在会议上发表的。其他主题,如 Cookie 或儿童数据,并未受到广泛关注。对整个 RE 过程进行了研究。20篇(22%)论文的作者与计算机科学无关;不过,大多数研究似乎都不是跨学科的。最后,我们讨论了文献中的空白、未来可能的研究领域以及跨学科研究对可再生能源数据保护监管要求的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Requirements Engineering
Requirements Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal provides a focus for the dissemination of new results about the elicitation, representation and validation of requirements of software intensive information systems or applications. Theoretical and applied submissions are welcome, but all papers must explicitly address: -the practical consequences of the ideas for the design of complex systems -how the ideas should be evaluated by the reflective practitioner The journal is motivated by a multi-disciplinary view that considers requirements not only in terms of software components specification but also in terms of activities for their elicitation, representation and agreement, carried out within an organisational and social context. To this end, contributions are sought from fields such as software engineering, information systems, occupational sociology, cognitive and organisational psychology, human-computer interaction, computer-supported cooperative work, linguistics and philosophy for work addressing specifically requirements engineering issues.
期刊最新文献
New product development based on non-functional requirements in renewable energy industries using hesitant fuzzy QFD-DFX approach Recommending and release planning of user-driven functionality deletion for mobile apps Benchmarking requirement template systems: comparing appropriateness, usability, and expressiveness A natural language-based method to specify privacy requirements: an evaluation with practitioners Navigating personalized medication: unveiling user needs to forge a cutting-edge platform for proactive prevention and monitoring of adverse drug reactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1