Stress from Cadaver Dissection Linked to Learning Conditions: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa

Jude Amechi Nnaka, Victor Udochukwu Ezeike, Kristjan Thompson, Izuchukwu Azuka Okafor
{"title":"Stress from Cadaver Dissection Linked to Learning Conditions: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Jude Amechi Nnaka, Victor Udochukwu Ezeike, Kristjan Thompson, Izuchukwu Azuka Okafor","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nThis study examined the relationship between students′ perceptions of cadaver dissection (CD) and some learning conditions during CD. Methods\nThis is a cross–sectional study involving 2968 medical students and graduates exposed to CD at nine countries systematically and proportionally selected from Sub–Saharan African countries based on their ranking on the four World Bank indices of development and education: population, literacy, human capital index (HCI), and human development index (HDI). A self–administered questionnaire was used to collect relevant data on learning conditions during CD experience of the participants, using online channels, including email, Whatsapp, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Results\nAbout half (48.76%) of the participants perceived CD as stressful, while 51.24% thought otherwise. However, 57% of participants from institutions where a CD session lasts three hours described their experience as stressful, whereas 69.67% of participants whose institution spent one hour in a single CD session agreed that CD is not stressful. Similarly, 60.63% of participants from institutions with a student-donor ratio between 5 to 10 students per cadaver described their experience as ′not stressful′. In comparison, 57.51% of participants from institutions with a student-donor ratio of 10–20 students per donor and 53.80% of participants from institutions with over 20 students per donor described their experience as stressful. Conclusions\nStudents from institutions with CD instructors, shorter CD sessions, and a smaller student-donor ratio are more likely to perceive CD as stress–free. Providing more support for students during CD and reducing time for CD may be an antidote to CD-related stress.","PeriodicalId":501387,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study examined the relationship between students′ perceptions of cadaver dissection (CD) and some learning conditions during CD. Methods This is a cross–sectional study involving 2968 medical students and graduates exposed to CD at nine countries systematically and proportionally selected from Sub–Saharan African countries based on their ranking on the four World Bank indices of development and education: population, literacy, human capital index (HCI), and human development index (HDI). A self–administered questionnaire was used to collect relevant data on learning conditions during CD experience of the participants, using online channels, including email, Whatsapp, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Results About half (48.76%) of the participants perceived CD as stressful, while 51.24% thought otherwise. However, 57% of participants from institutions where a CD session lasts three hours described their experience as stressful, whereas 69.67% of participants whose institution spent one hour in a single CD session agreed that CD is not stressful. Similarly, 60.63% of participants from institutions with a student-donor ratio between 5 to 10 students per cadaver described their experience as ′not stressful′. In comparison, 57.51% of participants from institutions with a student-donor ratio of 10–20 students per donor and 53.80% of participants from institutions with over 20 students per donor described their experience as stressful. Conclusions Students from institutions with CD instructors, shorter CD sessions, and a smaller student-donor ratio are more likely to perceive CD as stress–free. Providing more support for students during CD and reducing time for CD may be an antidote to CD-related stress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尸体解剖带来的压力与学习条件有关:来自撒哈拉以南非洲的证据
目的:本研究探讨了学生对尸体解剖(CD)的看法与尸体解剖过程中一些学习条件之间的关系。方法这是一项横断面研究,根据人口、识字率、人力资本指数(HCI)和人类发展指数(HDI)这四项世界银行发展和教育指数的排名,从撒哈拉以南非洲国家中按比例系统地选取了九个国家的 2968 名医科学生和毕业生参与研究。通过电子邮件、Whatsapp、Facebook、Instagram 和 Twitter 等在线渠道,采用自填式问卷调查法收集参与者在 CD 体验期间学习条件的相关数据。结果约一半(48.76%)的参与者认为 CD 有压力,而 51.24% 的参与者持相反意见。然而,57%的来自机构的参与者认为他们的经历是有压力的,而69.67%的来自机构的参与者认为他们的经历是没有压力的。同样,60.63%来自学生与捐献者比例为 5 至 10 人/尸体的院校的参与者认为他们的经历 "没有压力"。相比之下,57.51%来自学生与捐献者比例为 10-20 名学生/每具遗体的院校的参与者和 53.80%来自学生与捐献者比例超过 20 名学生/每具遗体的院校的参与者认为他们的经历是有压力的。结论有 CD 指导教师、CD 课时较短、学生与捐赠者比例较小的院校的学生更有可能认为 CD 没有压力。在 CD 期间为学生提供更多支持并缩短 CD 时间可能是缓解 CD 相关压力的良方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of wiki- and blog-based Virtual Learning Environments as tools for improving collaborative learning in the Bachelor of Nursing degree. Comparative Analysis of Stress Responses in Medical Students Using Virtual Reality Versus Traditional 3D-Printed Mannequins for Pericardiocentesis Training The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Medical Education and Practice: A Systematic Literature Review Precision Education Tools for Pediatrics Trainees: A Mixed-Methods Multi-Site Usability Assessment Silence in physician clinical practice: a scoping review protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1