Simplified modified tension chord model: An alternative crack width calculation model to Eurocode 2 and fib model codes

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Structural Concrete Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1002/suco.202400329
Otto Terjesen, Terje Kanstad, Reignard Tan
{"title":"Simplified modified tension chord model: An alternative crack width calculation model to Eurocode 2 and fib model codes","authors":"Otto Terjesen, Terje Kanstad, Reignard Tan","doi":"10.1002/suco.202400329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a new design code formulation for calculating crack widths for regular and more special reinforced concrete (RC) members. The more comprehensive Modified Tension Chord Model (MTCM) has been simplified (SMTCM) to facilitate an alternative method for calculating crack widths to Eurocode 2 and <jats:italic>fib</jats:italic> Model Codes. The model is based on mechanical principles without empirical modifications and is benchmarked against a previously published experimental crack width database. The SMTCM predicts crack widths quite as accurately as the MTCM and provides a broader range of applicability, such as for large covers and RC ties having arbitrary rebar configurations and thus a better crack width model than the current design codes for RC ties. In addition, there are no openings for ambiguous interpretations of the calculations, which can increase the risk of obtaining two different crack widths from two different designers. To further justify the SMTCM code formulation and concept, several RC ties with experimental crack width profiles were used and discussed. The results show a considerable difference between the crack width profile at the surface and at the reinforcement location, depending on the concrete cover and rebar size. These observations are interesting regarding durability design and requirements and show that the approach using a maximum design crack width at a specific surface as a decisive parameter should be further investigated, especially for large concrete covers.","PeriodicalId":21988,"journal":{"name":"Structural Concrete","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes a new design code formulation for calculating crack widths for regular and more special reinforced concrete (RC) members. The more comprehensive Modified Tension Chord Model (MTCM) has been simplified (SMTCM) to facilitate an alternative method for calculating crack widths to Eurocode 2 and fib Model Codes. The model is based on mechanical principles without empirical modifications and is benchmarked against a previously published experimental crack width database. The SMTCM predicts crack widths quite as accurately as the MTCM and provides a broader range of applicability, such as for large covers and RC ties having arbitrary rebar configurations and thus a better crack width model than the current design codes for RC ties. In addition, there are no openings for ambiguous interpretations of the calculations, which can increase the risk of obtaining two different crack widths from two different designers. To further justify the SMTCM code formulation and concept, several RC ties with experimental crack width profiles were used and discussed. The results show a considerable difference between the crack width profile at the surface and at the reinforcement location, depending on the concrete cover and rebar size. These observations are interesting regarding durability design and requirements and show that the approach using a maximum design crack width at a specific surface as a decisive parameter should be further investigated, especially for large concrete covers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简化的改良拉弦模型:欧洲规范 2 和纤维模型规范的另一种裂缝宽度计算模型
本文提出了一种新的设计规范公式,用于计算普通和更特殊的钢筋混凝土 (RC) 构件的裂缝宽度。更为全面的修正张弦模型(MTCM)已被简化(SMTCM),以便为计算欧洲规范 2 和纤维模型规范的裂缝宽度提供一种替代方法。该模型以机械原理为基础,未作经验性修改,并以先前公布的实验裂缝宽度数据库为基准。SMTCM 预测裂缝宽度的准确度与 MTCM 相当,而且适用范围更广,例如适用于大型盖板和具有任意钢筋配置的 RC 拉杆,因此是比当前 RC 拉杆设计规范更好的裂缝宽度模型。此外,不会出现对计算结果解释不清的情况,这可能会增加从两个不同设计者处获得两种不同裂缝宽度的风险。为了进一步证明 SMTCM 代码的制定和概念,我们使用并讨论了几条具有实验裂缝宽度剖面的 RC 拉杆。结果表明,根据混凝土覆盖层和钢筋尺寸的不同,表面和钢筋位置的裂缝宽度剖面存在很大差异。这些观察结果对耐久性设计和要求很有意义,并表明应进一步研究将特定表面的最大设计裂缝宽度作为决定性参数的方法,特别是对于大面积混凝土覆盖层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Concrete
Structural Concrete CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
15.60%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Structural Concrete, the official journal of the fib, provides conceptual and procedural guidance in the field of concrete construction, and features peer-reviewed papers, keynote research and industry news covering all aspects of the design, construction, performance in service and demolition of concrete structures. Main topics: design, construction, performance in service, conservation (assessment, maintenance, strengthening) and demolition of concrete structures research about the behaviour of concrete structures development of design methods fib Model Code sustainability of concrete structures.
期刊最新文献
Development of a new analytical model for circular concrete ring segments with dry joints under combined effects Fiber orientation and orientation factors in steel fiber‐reinforced concrete beams with hybrid fibers: A critical review Load‐path analysis of transverse tensile stresses in multiple‐pile caps Mechanical behavior of prestressed UHPC wind turbine tower columns under combined axial compression and bending Experimental investigation on mechanical property and hydration process of sintered sludge cement paste at different water‐binder ratios and curing ages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1