A conceptual and methodological framework for clustering and correlation analyses of the approaches and study skills inventory for students

IF 3.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s10734-024-01253-7
Sotiris Kotsiantis, Martha Georgiou, Dimitris Kalles, Skarlatos G. Dedos
{"title":"A conceptual and methodological framework for clustering and correlation analyses of the approaches and study skills inventory for students","authors":"Sotiris Kotsiantis, Martha Georgiou, Dimitris Kalles, Skarlatos G. Dedos","doi":"10.1007/s10734-024-01253-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) is a questionnaire that was developed in the ’80s and ’90s with the aim of identifying the ways students study and learn in higher education institutions. It broadly classifies students as approaching their study in a deep, a strategic and/or a surface/apathetic way. A large (N=2029) dataset of the inventory was analysed in this study by using clustering algorithms and correlation analyses of students’ responses. By combining both analyses we show that, in addition to the 3 already identified and well-documented approaches, there exists a 4th approach to studying that emerges from alternative groupings of students’ responses to the items of the inventory and is supported by findings from the k-means clustering algorithm. We term this 4th approach “Dispositional Mindfulness” and find that it is an approach that is associated with gender and year of study and characterises responders to the inventory who pay attention to their present state as students, adapting to their status as higher education students rather than constantly adopting a specific approach to studying. We propose that the Dispositional Mindfulness approach is a primal entity that can be identified, in addition to the other 3 approaches, through the methodological framework that we describe herein and we note that augmenting conventional correlations with k-means clustering can deliver equally interesting findings in the analysis of educational datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":48383,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01253-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) is a questionnaire that was developed in the ’80s and ’90s with the aim of identifying the ways students study and learn in higher education institutions. It broadly classifies students as approaching their study in a deep, a strategic and/or a surface/apathetic way. A large (N=2029) dataset of the inventory was analysed in this study by using clustering algorithms and correlation analyses of students’ responses. By combining both analyses we show that, in addition to the 3 already identified and well-documented approaches, there exists a 4th approach to studying that emerges from alternative groupings of students’ responses to the items of the inventory and is supported by findings from the k-means clustering algorithm. We term this 4th approach “Dispositional Mindfulness” and find that it is an approach that is associated with gender and year of study and characterises responders to the inventory who pay attention to their present state as students, adapting to their status as higher education students rather than constantly adopting a specific approach to studying. We propose that the Dispositional Mindfulness approach is a primal entity that can be identified, in addition to the other 3 approaches, through the methodological framework that we describe herein and we note that augmenting conventional correlations with k-means clustering can deliver equally interesting findings in the analysis of educational datasets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对学生学习方法和学习技能清单进行聚类和相关分析的概念和方法框架
学生学习方法和学习技能调查表(ASSIST)是在上世纪八九十年代编制的一份调查问卷,旨在确定高等院校学生的学习方法。它将学生的学习方法大致分为深层学习方法、战略学习方法和/或表层学习方法。本研究通过使用聚类算法和学生回答的相关性分析,对清单中的一个大型数据集(N=2029)进行了分析。通过将这两种分析相结合,我们发现,除了已经确定并得到充分证明的 3 种学习方法外,还存在第 4 种学习方法,这是从学生对清单项目的回答的其他分组中产生的,并得到了 k-means 聚类算法研究结果的支持。我们将这第四种学习方法称为 "处事正念",并发现这种方法与性别和就读年级有关,是对清单做出回答者的特征,他们关注自己作为学生的现状,适应自己作为高等教育学生的身份,而不是不断采用特定的学习方法。我们建议,除了其他三种方法之外,还可以通过我们在本文中描述的方法框架来识别 "倾向性正念 "方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education
Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Higher Education is recognised as the leading international journal of Higher Education studies, publishing twelve separate numbers each year. Since its establishment in 1972, Higher Education has followed educational developments throughout the world in universities, polytechnics, colleges, and vocational and education institutions. It has actively endeavoured to report on developments in both public and private Higher Education sectors. Contributions have come from leading scholars from different countries while articles have tackled the problems of teachers as well as students, and of planners as well as administrators. While each Higher Education system has its own distinctive features, common problems and issues are shared internationally by researchers, teachers and institutional leaders. Higher Education offers opportunities for exchange of research results, experience and insights, and provides a forum for ongoing discussion between experts. Higher Education publishes authoritative overview articles, comparative studies and analyses of particular problems or issues. All contributions are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
“Writing for English-medium publication is a journey to nowhere — no route and no tools”: Russian academics’ perceptions of the existing publication support The enigma of collegiality: collegiality frames and institutional logics in US higher education Navigating public goods: Chilean public universities and their transformative role in Latin America Exploring perceptions of public good(s), government, and global contributions in Japanese higher education: a phenomenographic approach The importance of international and national publications for promotion and the impact of recruitment policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1