{"title":"A DPC Database Study on the Safety of Atezolizumab/Carboplatin/Etoposide in Extensive-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer in Japanese Patients","authors":"Motohiro Tamiya, Shunichiro Iwasawa, Yusuke Sasaki, Kosei Tajima, Yasutaka Chiba","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-02905-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide (ACE) therapy is a standard of care for extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, its safety data are scarce, limiting generalization to the Japanese population.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the safety of ACE versus carboplatin and etoposide (CE) therapies in Japanese patients using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database by comparing the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Retrospective data on clinical background and AEs were extracted from the DPC database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) up to 6 months were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 330,774 patients were identified using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes, of whom 277 were included in the ACE cohort and 478 in the CE cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and thyroid dysfunction was significantly higher in the ACE cohort compared with the CE cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–5.43) for skin disorder and 6.92 (95% CI 2.00–23.89) for thyroid dysfunction. The adjusted RMST differences were − 8.2 days (95% CI − 16.0 to − 0.4 days) for skin disorder and − 8.8 days (95% CI − 15.7 to − 1.9 days) for thyroid dysfunction.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study provides evidence regarding the safety of ACE combination therapy in Japanese clinical practice using the DPC database, with results comparable to those reported in pivotal clinical trials.</p><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID UMIN000041508.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02905-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide (ACE) therapy is a standard of care for extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, its safety data are scarce, limiting generalization to the Japanese population.
Methods
This study aimed to compare the safety of ACE versus carboplatin and etoposide (CE) therapies in Japanese patients using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database by comparing the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Retrospective data on clinical background and AEs were extracted from the DPC database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) up to 6 months were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method.
Results
A total of 330,774 patients were identified using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes, of whom 277 were included in the ACE cohort and 478 in the CE cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and thyroid dysfunction was significantly higher in the ACE cohort compared with the CE cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–5.43) for skin disorder and 6.92 (95% CI 2.00–23.89) for thyroid dysfunction. The adjusted RMST differences were − 8.2 days (95% CI − 16.0 to − 0.4 days) for skin disorder and − 8.8 days (95% CI − 15.7 to − 1.9 days) for thyroid dysfunction.
Conclusions
This study provides evidence regarding the safety of ACE combination therapy in Japanese clinical practice using the DPC database, with results comparable to those reported in pivotal clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.