Sexual Orientation-Specific Policies Are Associated With Prenatal Care Use in the First Trimester Among Sexual Minority Women: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Annals of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1093/abm/kaae037
Bethany G Everett, Zoë Bergman, Brittany M Charlton, Veronica Barcelona
{"title":"Sexual Orientation-Specific Policies Are Associated With Prenatal Care Use in the First Trimester Among Sexual Minority Women: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Bethany G Everett, Zoë Bergman, Brittany M Charlton, Veronica Barcelona","doi":"10.1093/abm/kaae037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has shown sexual minority women (SMW) are more likely to report multiple maternal and infant health outcomes compared to heterosexual women and that these outcomes are moderated by the policy environment. Little is known, however, about prenatal care use disparities or the social determinants of prenatal care use for SMW.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the relationship between sexual orientation-specific policies that confer legal protections (e.g., hate crime protections, housing discrimination, same-sex marriage) and prenatal care use among women using a prospective, population-based data set.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health and logistic regression, we link measures of state policies to the use of prenatal care in the first trimester among women who had live births. The use of prospective data allows us to adjust for covariates associated with preconception care use prior to pregnancy (n = 586 singleton births to SMW; n = 4,539 singleton births to heterosexual women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sexual orientation-specific policies that conferred protections were associated with increased use of prenatal care among pregnancies reported by SMW (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.16, 2.96). In fact, in states with zero protections, we found no differences in prenatal care use by sexual minority status; however, in states with two or more protective policies, SMW were more likely to access prenatal care in the first trimester than heterosexual women. There was no relationship between sexual orientation-specific policy environments and prenatal care use among pregnancies reported by heterosexual women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent research has documented that SMW are more likely to have adverse perinatal and obstetrical outcomes than their heterosexual peers. These findings suggest that Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual-specific policy protections may facilitate the use of prenatal care among SMW, a potentially important pathway to improve reproductive health among this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7939,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaae037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research has shown sexual minority women (SMW) are more likely to report multiple maternal and infant health outcomes compared to heterosexual women and that these outcomes are moderated by the policy environment. Little is known, however, about prenatal care use disparities or the social determinants of prenatal care use for SMW.

Purpose: To examine the relationship between sexual orientation-specific policies that confer legal protections (e.g., hate crime protections, housing discrimination, same-sex marriage) and prenatal care use among women using a prospective, population-based data set.

Methods: Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health and logistic regression, we link measures of state policies to the use of prenatal care in the first trimester among women who had live births. The use of prospective data allows us to adjust for covariates associated with preconception care use prior to pregnancy (n = 586 singleton births to SMW; n = 4,539 singleton births to heterosexual women).

Results: Sexual orientation-specific policies that conferred protections were associated with increased use of prenatal care among pregnancies reported by SMW (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.16, 2.96). In fact, in states with zero protections, we found no differences in prenatal care use by sexual minority status; however, in states with two or more protective policies, SMW were more likely to access prenatal care in the first trimester than heterosexual women. There was no relationship between sexual orientation-specific policy environments and prenatal care use among pregnancies reported by heterosexual women.

Conclusions: Recent research has documented that SMW are more likely to have adverse perinatal and obstetrical outcomes than their heterosexual peers. These findings suggest that Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual-specific policy protections may facilitate the use of prenatal care among SMW, a potentially important pathway to improve reproductive health among this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性取向特定政策与性少数群体妇女在怀孕头三个月使用产前护理有关:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
背景:先前的研究表明,与异性恋妇女相比,性少数群体妇女(SMW)更有可能报告多种孕产妇和婴儿健康结果,而且这些结果会受到政策环境的影响。目的:使用基于人口的前瞻性数据集,研究给予法律保护的特定性取向政策(如仇恨犯罪保护、住房歧视、同性婚姻)与妇女产前保健使用之间的关系:方法:我们利用 "全国青少年到成人健康纵向研究"(National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health)和逻辑回归(Logistic Regression)方法,将各州的政策措施与活产妇女在孕期前三个月使用产前护理的情况联系起来。通过使用前瞻性数据,我们可以调整与怀孕前使用孕前保健相关的协变量(n = 586 名单胎生育的 SMW;n = 4,539 名单胎生育的异性恋妇女):结果:在 SMW 报告的妊娠中,给予保护的特定性取向政策与使用产前护理的增加相关(OR = 1.86,95% CI 1.16,2.96)。事实上,在保护措施为零的州,我们发现产前护理的使用情况在性少数群体身份方面没有差异;然而,在有两项或更多保护政策的州,与异性恋妇女相比,性少数群体妇女更有可能在怀孕头三个月获得产前护理。在异性恋妇女报告的妊娠中,特定性取向的政策环境与产前护理的使用之间没有关系:最近的研究表明,与异性恋妇女相比,女同性恋/男同性恋更有可能出现不利的围产期和产科结果。这些研究结果表明,针对女同性恋/男同性恋/双性恋的政策保护可能会促进 SMW 使用产前护理,这是改善这一人群生殖健康的潜在重要途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Annals of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Annals of Behavioral Medicine aims to foster the exchange of knowledge derived from the disciplines involved in the field of behavioral medicine, and the integration of biological, psychosocial, and behavioral factors and principles as they relate to such areas as health promotion, disease prevention, risk factor modification, disease progression, adjustment and adaptation to physical disorders, and rehabilitation. To achieve these goals, much of the journal is devoted to the publication of original empirical articles including reports of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, or other basic and clinical investigations. Integrative reviews of the evidence for the application of behavioral interventions in health care will also be provided. .
期刊最新文献
Women's Relationships With Healthcare and Providers: The Role of Weight Stigma in Healthcare and Weight Bias Internalization. Associations Between the Superwoman Schema, Stress, and Cardiovascular Health Among African-American Women. The Relationship Between Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Narrative Review. Increases in Psychological Stress Are Associated With Higher Fasting Glucose in US Chinese Immigrants. Correction: POSTER SESSION C: EXPLORING THE MODERATING ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA USAGE ON MOTIVATION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1