Supporting victim-survivors during investigations of health practitioner misconduct: early learnings from a trauma-informed service.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002765
Jacinta Evans, Katherine Piech, Eva Saar, Sarah Anderson
{"title":"Supporting victim-survivors during investigations of health practitioner misconduct: early learnings from a trauma-informed service.","authors":"Jacinta Evans, Katherine Piech, Eva Saar, Sarah Anderson","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2021, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency established a support service to provide additional assistance to victim-survivors involved in complaints related to sexual boundary violations. This study evaluates the first stages of service delivery to understand participants' experiences with the service, gauge the service's reception, and improve support provided in future.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Programme data was analysed descriptively to understand uptake and participant engagement since inception. Semistructured interviews with a purposive convenience sample of participants who had recently completed service engagement were conducted over 6 months and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings were triangulated to judge the effectiveness of the support provided by the service and highlight learning and development opportunities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 275 participants were referred to the programme and 175 (64%) of those referred had engaged with the service. At the time of analysis, less than a quarter (21%) had refused support or disengaged following referral. Participants reported appreciation of and satisfaction with the support they received from the service and strongly reiterated the need for support in this context. Flexibility and quality communication as part of the service model was associated with participants feeling supported through three main themes: safety and connection, guidance and process navigation and representation and advocacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Good uptake of the service and positive feedback from participants suggests that the programme has been a valuable and well-received initiative. Exploration of engagement trends as well as a more nuanced analysis of the benefits of support provided would augment these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11243277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In 2021, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency established a support service to provide additional assistance to victim-survivors involved in complaints related to sexual boundary violations. This study evaluates the first stages of service delivery to understand participants' experiences with the service, gauge the service's reception, and improve support provided in future.

Design: Programme data was analysed descriptively to understand uptake and participant engagement since inception. Semistructured interviews with a purposive convenience sample of participants who had recently completed service engagement were conducted over 6 months and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings were triangulated to judge the effectiveness of the support provided by the service and highlight learning and development opportunities.

Results: During the study period, 275 participants were referred to the programme and 175 (64%) of those referred had engaged with the service. At the time of analysis, less than a quarter (21%) had refused support or disengaged following referral. Participants reported appreciation of and satisfaction with the support they received from the service and strongly reiterated the need for support in this context. Flexibility and quality communication as part of the service model was associated with participants feeling supported through three main themes: safety and connection, guidance and process navigation and representation and advocacy.

Conclusion: Good uptake of the service and positive feedback from participants suggests that the programme has been a valuable and well-received initiative. Exploration of engagement trends as well as a more nuanced analysis of the benefits of support provided would augment these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在调查医疗从业人员不当行为期间为受害者-幸存者提供支持:从创伤知情服务中汲取的早期经验。
目标:2021 年,澳大利亚卫生从业人员监管局设立了一项支持服务,为涉及性边界侵犯投诉的受害者-幸存者提供额外援助。本研究对服务提供的第一阶段进行了评估,以了解参与者的服务体验,衡量服务的受欢迎程度,并改进未来提供的支持:设计:对项目数据进行描述性分析,以了解自项目启动以来的使用情况和参与者的参与情况。对最近完成服务参与的参与者进行了为期 6 个月的半结构式访谈,并使用反思性主题分析法对访谈结果进行了分析。对调查结果进行了三角测量,以判断服务所提供支持的有效性,并强调学习和发展机会:在研究期间,有 275 名参与者被转介到该计划,其中 175 人(64%)参与了服务。在进行分析时,不到四分之一(21%)的参与者在转介后拒绝接受支持或脱离了服务。参与者对服务所提供的支持表示赞赏和满意,并强烈重申在这种情况下需要支持。作为服务模式的一部分,灵活性和高质量的沟通与参与者通过以下三大主题感受到的支持有关:安全和联系、指导和流程导航以及代表和倡导:结论:服务的良好参与度和参与者的积极反馈表明,该计划是一项有价值且广受欢迎的举措。对参与趋势的探索,以及对所提供支持的益处进行更细致的分析,都将进一步丰富这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Achieving and sustaining reduction in hospital-acquired complications in an Australian local health service. Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum. Increasing the uptake of advance care directives through staff education and one-on-one support for people facing end-of-life. Community breast pain clinics can provide safe, quality care for women presenting with breast pain. Implementing a multisite shared haemodialysis care programme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1