Comparative Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.14740/cr1638
Jordan Llerena-Velastegui, Kristina Zumbana-Podaneva, Sebastian Velastegui-Zurita, Melany Mejia-Mora, Juan Perez-Tomassetti, Allison Cabrera-Cruz, Pablo Haro-Arteaga, Ana Clara Fonseca Souza de Jesus, Pedro Moraes Coelho, Cristian Sanahuja-Montiel
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Jordan Llerena-Velastegui, Kristina Zumbana-Podaneva, Sebastian Velastegui-Zurita, Melany Mejia-Mora, Juan Perez-Tomassetti, Allison Cabrera-Cruz, Pablo Haro-Arteaga, Ana Clara Fonseca Souza de Jesus, Pedro Moraes Coelho, Cristian Sanahuja-Montiel","doi":"10.14740/cr1638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major global health issue and a leading cause of death. This study compares the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the management of IHD, focusing on their impact on revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), and post-procedural stroke. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of PCI and CABG in treating IHD based on an exhaustive literature review of the past 5 years, emphasizing recent advancements and outcomes in IHD management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review analyzed 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The study specifically assessed the incidences of revascularization, stroke, and MI in patients treated with either PCI or CABG. The comparison between CABG and PCI exclusively focused on lesions with a SYNTAX score exceeding 32.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight CABG's significant efficacy over PCI in reducing revascularization and MI. The aggregated Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) value for revascularization was 1.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65 - 2.07), signifying CABG's advantage. Additionally, CABG demonstrated superior performance in diminishing MI occurrences (M-H = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.13 - 6.53). In contrast, PCI was more effective in reducing stroke (M-H = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study confirms CABG's superiority in reducing revascularization and MI in IHD patients, highlighting PCI's effectiveness in reducing stroke risk. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment strategies in IHD management and emphasize the need for ongoing research and evidence-based guidelines to aid in treatment selection for IHD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"153-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major global health issue and a leading cause of death. This study compares the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the management of IHD, focusing on their impact on revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), and post-procedural stroke. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of PCI and CABG in treating IHD based on an exhaustive literature review of the past 5 years, emphasizing recent advancements and outcomes in IHD management.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review analyzed 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The study specifically assessed the incidences of revascularization, stroke, and MI in patients treated with either PCI or CABG. The comparison between CABG and PCI exclusively focused on lesions with a SYNTAX score exceeding 32.

Results: Our findings highlight CABG's significant efficacy over PCI in reducing revascularization and MI. The aggregated Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) value for revascularization was 1.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65 - 2.07), signifying CABG's advantage. Additionally, CABG demonstrated superior performance in diminishing MI occurrences (M-H = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.13 - 6.53). In contrast, PCI was more effective in reducing stroke (M-H = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.10).

Conclusion: The study confirms CABG's superiority in reducing revascularization and MI in IHD patients, highlighting PCI's effectiveness in reducing stroke risk. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment strategies in IHD management and emphasize the need for ongoing research and evidence-based guidelines to aid in treatment selection for IHD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植治疗缺血性心脏病的疗效比较:近期随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景:缺血性心脏病(IHD)是一个重大的全球性健康问题,也是导致死亡的主要原因。本研究比较了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)在治疗缺血性心脏病中的有效性,重点关注它们对血管再通、心肌梗死(MI)和术后中风的影响。本研究旨在通过对过去5年的详尽文献进行回顾,评估和比较PCI和CABG治疗IHD的效果,强调IHD治疗的最新进展和结果:综合文献综述分析了从 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 等数据库中检索到的 32 项随机对照试验 (RCT)。研究特别评估了接受 PCI 或 CABG 治疗的患者的血管再通、中风和心肌梗死发生率。CABG 和 PCI 的比较只针对 SYNTAX 评分超过 32 分的病变:结果:我们的研究结果表明,在减少血管再通和心肌梗死方面,CABG 比 PCI 有显著疗效。血管再形成的 Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) 总值为 1.85(95% 置信区间 (CI):1.65 - 2.07),显示了 CABG 的优势。此外,CABG 在减少心肌梗死发生率方面也表现出色(M-H = 2.71,95% 置信区间:1.13 - 6.53)。相比之下,PCI 在减少中风方面更为有效(M-H = 0.80,95% CI:0.60 - 1.10):该研究证实了 CABG 在减少 IHD 患者血管再通和心肌梗死方面的优越性,并强调了 PCI 在降低卒中风险方面的有效性。这些研究结果突出了个性化治疗策略在心肌缺血和心脏病治疗中的重要性,并强调了持续研究和循证指南在帮助心肌缺血和心脏病患者选择治疗方法方面的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Advances in the Understanding and Treatment of Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy. Detection of Left Atrial Remodeling by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in Symptomatic Patients Known to Had Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Diverse Concepts in Definitions of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Theory and Practice. Effect of Post-Loop Diuretic Urinary Sodium Level on Length of Stay and Rehospitalization in Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure Patients. Evaluating the Prognostic Value of the Modified H2FPEF Score in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1