Effect of Aspirin Use on the Adverse Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.14740/cr1645
Poornima Vinod, Vinod Krishnappa, William Rathell, Saira Amir, Subrina Sundil, Godwin Dogbey, Hiten Patel, William Herzog
{"title":"Effect of Aspirin Use on the Adverse Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19.","authors":"Poornima Vinod, Vinod Krishnappa, William Rathell, Saira Amir, Subrina Sundil, Godwin Dogbey, Hiten Patel, William Herzog","doi":"10.14740/cr1645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers multiple components of the immune system and causes inflammation of endothelial walls across vascular beds, resulting in respiratory failure, arterial and venous thrombosis, myocardial injury, and multi-organ failure leading to death. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, aspirin was suggested for the treatment of symptomatic individuals, given its analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and antiviral effects. This study aimed to evaluate the association of aspirin use with various clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study involving patients aged ≥ 18 years and hospitalized for COVID-19 from March 2020 to October 2020. Primary outcomes were acute cardiovascular events (ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), type 1 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), acute congestive heart failure (CHF), and acute stroke) and death. Secondary outcomes were respiratory failure, need for mechanical ventilation, and acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 376 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 128 were taking aspirin. Significant proportions of native Americans were hospitalized for COVID-19 in both aspirin (22.7%) and non-aspirin (24.6%) groups. Between aspirin and non-aspirin groups, no significant differences were found with regard to mechanical ventilator support (21.1% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.16), acute cardiovascular events (7.8% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.32), acute DVT/PE (3.9% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.9), readmission rate (13.3% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.91) and mortality (23.4% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.5); however, the median duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter (7 vs. 9 days, P = 0.04) and median length of hospitalization was significantly longer (5.5 vs. 4 days, P = 0.01) in aspirin group compared to non-aspirin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were found in acute cardiovascular events, acute DVT/PE, mechanical ventilator support, and mortality rate between hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were taking aspirin compared to those not taking aspirin. However, larger studies are required to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"179-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers multiple components of the immune system and causes inflammation of endothelial walls across vascular beds, resulting in respiratory failure, arterial and venous thrombosis, myocardial injury, and multi-organ failure leading to death. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, aspirin was suggested for the treatment of symptomatic individuals, given its analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and antiviral effects. This study aimed to evaluate the association of aspirin use with various clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Methods: This was a retrospective study involving patients aged ≥ 18 years and hospitalized for COVID-19 from March 2020 to October 2020. Primary outcomes were acute cardiovascular events (ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), type 1 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), acute congestive heart failure (CHF), and acute stroke) and death. Secondary outcomes were respiratory failure, need for mechanical ventilation, and acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE).

Results: Of 376 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 128 were taking aspirin. Significant proportions of native Americans were hospitalized for COVID-19 in both aspirin (22.7%) and non-aspirin (24.6%) groups. Between aspirin and non-aspirin groups, no significant differences were found with regard to mechanical ventilator support (21.1% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.16), acute cardiovascular events (7.8% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.32), acute DVT/PE (3.9% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.9), readmission rate (13.3% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.91) and mortality (23.4% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.5); however, the median duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter (7 vs. 9 days, P = 0.04) and median length of hospitalization was significantly longer (5.5 vs. 4 days, P = 0.01) in aspirin group compared to non-aspirin group.

Conclusion: No significant differences were found in acute cardiovascular events, acute DVT/PE, mechanical ventilator support, and mortality rate between hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were taking aspirin compared to those not taking aspirin. However, larger studies are required to confirm our findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用阿司匹林对 COVID-19 住院患者不良后果的影响
背景:2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)会引发免疫系统的多种成分,并导致血管床内皮壁发炎,导致呼吸衰竭、动静脉血栓形成、心肌损伤和多器官衰竭,最终导致死亡。在 COVID-19 大流行的早期,由于阿司匹林具有镇痛、解热、消炎、抗血栓和抗病毒的作用,因此被建议用于治疗有症状的患者。本研究旨在评估因 COVID-19 而住院的患者使用阿司匹林与各种临床结果之间的关系:这是一项回顾性研究,涉及 2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 10 月期间因 COVID-19 住院且年龄≥ 18 岁的患者。主要结果为急性心血管事件(ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、1型非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)、急性充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和急性卒中)和死亡。次要结果为呼吸衰竭、机械通气需求和急性深静脉血栓(DVT)/肺栓塞(PE):在376名因COVID-19住院的患者中,有128人服用阿司匹林。在阿司匹林组(22.7%)和非阿司匹林组(24.6%)中,因 COVID-19 住院的美国本地人比例都很高。阿司匹林组和非阿司匹林组在机械呼吸机支持(21.1% vs. 15.3%,P = 0.16)、急性心血管事件(7.8% vs. 5.2%,P = 0.32)、急性深静脉血栓/PE(3.9% vs. 5.2%,P = 0.9)、再入院率(13.3% vs. 12.9%,P = 0.91)和死亡率(23.4% vs. 20.2%,P = 0.5);然而,与非阿司匹林组相比,阿司匹林组机械通气的中位持续时间显著缩短(7 vs. 9天,P = 0.04),中位住院时间显著延长(5.5 vs. 4天,P = 0.01):结论:与未服用阿司匹林的患者相比,服用阿司匹林的 COVID-19 住院患者在急性心血管事件、急性深静脉血栓/动脉粥样硬化、机械呼吸机支持和死亡率方面无明显差异。不过,还需要更大规模的研究来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Advances in the Understanding and Treatment of Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy. Detection of Left Atrial Remodeling by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in Symptomatic Patients Known to Had Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Diverse Concepts in Definitions of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Theory and Practice. Effect of Post-Loop Diuretic Urinary Sodium Level on Length of Stay and Rehospitalization in Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure Patients. Evaluating the Prognostic Value of the Modified H2FPEF Score in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1